Las Vegas Sun

October 1, 2014

Currently: 74° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Caesars Entertainment will take arena proposal to the people

Sun archives

Caesars Entertainment is giving up on trying to win legislators’ support for a resort-corridor sales tax to finance its proposed arena on the Strip, and instead will hope for voters’ approval in 2012.

It’s a sign of the anti-tax times in Nevada, when any lawmaker who supports a tax increase can expect political fire.

Backed by construction industry and union allies, Democrats have pushed several proposals this session that would create jobs, from school construction to transportation projects. But Democratic lawmakers, Caesars and the construction trades have no appetite for tackling the 18,000-seat arena in 2011, given that it has pitted two of the state’s most influential casino companies against each other. Instead, Caesars, as well as the AFL-CIO, which sits on the advocacy group’s board, will look to the November 2012 ballot for public support.

“We know the reality of the political times we’re living in,” said Marybel Batjer, a vice president of Caesars Entertainment, speaking on behalf of the nonprofit group advocating for the ballot measure. “Taxes are a very difficult thing for a legislator, in many, many states right now to vote for. We’re going right to a vote of the people. We’re on the ballot in 2012.”

Under the Nevada Constitution, lawmakers have 40 days to act on an initiative petition. Caesars Entertainment said it will take the measure to voters instead of trying to find two-thirds of lawmakers to pass the tax increase.

Caesars, formerly Harrah’s Entertainment, collected 200,000 signatures last year to qualify the proposed sales tax increase for an arena. Under the law, the Legislature has three options:

• Pass the proposal in the first 40 days of the Legislature. That’s a deadline of March 18.

• Reject it or don’t pass it, and the measure would go on the ballot in the next general election.

• Pass a competing question for voters to consider alongside the original initiative petition.

There are several Las Vegas arena proposals, including one envisioned at UNLV and another downtown. Advocates say such a facility is needed to remain competitive as a tourist destination.

No arena has been built in the past decade without taxpayers subsidizing it.

But taxes, which require approval by a two-thirds majority of lawmakers, are never easy to pass, and even more so this year after November’s election sent a batch of conservative lawmakers to Carson City.

MGM Resorts International, the state’s largest private employer, has actively opposed the petition.

Gov. Brian Sandoval said before the session began that he would oppose the petition because it involves a tax increase.

It faces skeptical lawmakers from both parties.

“My questions and concerns are at a time when we’re looking at cutting the budget nearly $3 billion, particularly for education, how is it that we are going to fund a proposal to build an arena? Are those the priorities we need in Nevada?” Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford said on “To the Point” with Sun reporter Anjeanette Damon.

Still, Democratic lawmakers have been pushing for more money for infrastructure projects to stimulate the suffering construction industry, and some argue an arena would fit the bill. Additionally, Caesars has tried to frame this as a “tax on tourists,” because the 0.9 percent sales tax increase, generating $30 million a year, would be collected on the Strip.

Lawmakers in 2009 passed an initiative petition that raised the room tax in Clark and Washoe counties, reasoning it would largely be out-of-towners paying the bill.

But that initiative, sponsored by the Nevada State Education Association, had two things going for it that Caesars’ arena does not:

For the first two years, the money went to the state’s general fund, which offset taxes or cuts the Legislature would otherwise have had to make that session.

And, Clark and Washoe voters approved an advisory ballot question approving the matter. Lawmakers always appreciate political cover.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 6 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Here's one guy who will vote against it if it involves one red cent of public funds. Caesars Entertainment is a multi-billion $ company. If an arena is financially viable, why do they beg for taxpayer $s? No subsidizes for anyone!

  2. At least they are creating jobs for signature gatherers.

  3. For the first time I am with Jerry on this one. If they want the arena, then they can pay for it.

    They may get signatures but they will not get it passed when it comes time to vote. Taxpayers have no business paying for an arena in this town.

  4. The MGM Executives do not live in the Real World. They don't know and don't care about what is happening to the rest of the State or the Country.

  5. With you folks it's a entertainment arena. With us California folks it's a high speed rail system. Both are white elephants and will not return the investment to the voters. If they were such great moneymakers why isn't private industry jumping at the oppertunity to toss their money in the pot? Why can't our leaders understand that when there isn't any money left in the bank, you can't continue spending? If this comes to a vote, kick it to the curb..

  6. No Public Money for Private Profit Arenas. The Owners of these arenas want the public to take the risk while they take the profit (if there ever is any).

    On trains I've yet to be convinced they are not a good thing. How many more highway lanes will it take in 30 years between LA and LV. At 50% of the projected ridership how long is the payback period. At what price per gallon of gas is Rail a no brainer? Remember Jet Fuel will rise accordingly. Could a Power Transmission Line to LA be built with a Mag-Lev system to offset some of the building cost. Lots of questions and only political posturing over the answers.