Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleDirty detail: Solar panels need water
How much is the question, as developers downplay frequency of cleanings
Friday, Sept. 18, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- Solar isn't powering local budgets (9-4-2009)
- Not in my backyard, say foes of planned solar plants (8-24-2009)
- The cost of building a solar powered economy (8-16-2009)
- Negotiations under way for more solar energy in Eldorado Valley (8-16-2009)
- Public meeting held on proposed Primm solar plant (8-13-2009)
- BLM seeks comment on proposed solar plants near Primm (8-10-2009)
Sun Coverage
Beyond the Sun
- This Las Vegas Sun story about the water needs of solar power plants caught the attention of Mother Jones blogger Osha Gray Davidson, a nationally recognized environmental journalist. Davidson praised the story for making "a compelling case for considering all the environmental impacts of generating energy, no matter what the source." Mother Jones is a nonprofit news Web site and bimonthly magazine specializing in investigative, political, and social justice reporting. Read the blog entry.
Southern Nevada may pose more of a dirty little problem for some solar plant developers than they realize or are letting on.
Solar photovoltaic developers say not to worry about how much water their plants will use because they need only enough water to run the office bathrooms and wash the arrays of panels a couple of times a year.
But people who live near proposed plants or maintain solar panels in the desert guffaw at that last bit and are willing to bet the panels will need to be hosed down more frequently.
Dust on solar panels can decrease their efficiency by about 3 percent, solar photovoltaic experts said. The larger the solar array, the more electricity lost.
“On a home that doesn’t mean much of anything, but on a huge solar power plant that could mean real money,” said Nevada solar panel installer Chris Brooks, director of renewable energy for Bombard Electric.
Most photovoltaic arrays are cleaned with tap water sprayed with a hose or from a water truck. So solar array managers have to add in the cost of labor, truck rental and gasoline. In a water-starved desert, the additional consideration is how much of the region’s most critical natural resource will wind up evaporating or dripping into the desert.
Solar photovoltaic developers say their plants don’t use much water, but “much” is relative. True, they use a fraction of what a water-cooled solar thermal power plant consumes annually — about a 16,689 gallons per megawatt for photovoltaics compared with 2.61 million gallons per megawatt for wet-cooled solar thermal — but a large photovoltaic array can still easily use more water in a year than an entire residential block.
The array planned for Primm, for example, is expected to annually require at least as much water as 10.5 average Las Vegas households. NexLight North and NexLight South, which have been combined in the first industrial-scale solar photovoltaic array planned the Bureau of Land Management land in Nevada, would need to truck in about 6.8 million gallons of water a year, developers reported in planning documents. That’s enough, they say, to clean the thousands of acres of solar panels about twice a year.
Although that is the industry standard for washing large arrays of solar panels, few large solar arrays in the Mojave get away with so few cleanings.
UNLV’s photovoltaic arrays are washed about monthly. NV Energy washes the panels at the Clark Generating Station about four times a year. Other NV Energy owned solar panels are washed three times a year.
When NexLight disclosed plans for biannual cleanings at BLM scoping meetings, locals scoffed. If the dust on the cars in the parking lot was any indication, the developers would be cleaning those panels a lot more than twice a year. The dust in the Ivanpah Valley can be brutal under normal circumstances, residents said. But the area is also a popular spot for large multiday off-road races that can stir up even more dust.
The NexLight plants are planned smack dab in the middle of a popular off-road raceway, which the company proposes rerouting around the solar plant.
Just washing the panels more often is not the easy solution it sounds like. If the increase in electrical output won’t generate more money than it costs to wash the panels, they can just stay dirty.
“Efficiency does drop off with time,” said Bob Boehm, director of UNLV’s Center for Energy Research. “But you really have to balance the loss in efficiency from the dust with the cost of the water and labor.”
So solar array managers try to keep the panels cleanest when the solar panels are operating at maximum efficiency in the long days of spring and summer. Unfortunately, that’s when demand for water is the highest, putting even more strain on a scarce resource.
When they can, operators of solar arrays let Mother Nature do the work for them. Though Southern Nevada gets only about 4 inches of rain in a good year, the weather is relatively predictable. That gives solar array managers time to get the panels ready for cloudy weather and, they hope, a free cleaning.
That preparation is a must. Cold water on a very hot solar panel usually means shattered glass, so managers have to power down arrays well before either a cleaning or rainfall. If the storm produces rain that falls in a torrent, they’ve hit the jackpot.
“A really good rainstorm means you don’t need to worry about washing your panels for a while,” Boehm said. “But if you get this typical Las Vegas rainstorm with tons of wind and dust and forty-five drops of rain, that’s the worst kind of thing. It just plasters the dirt to the panel.”
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- UNLV makes key plays down stretch to hold off San Diego State 65-63
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Now you're getting it!
When they re-route the OHV routes, would there not be additional dust kicked up from vehivles?
Oh yeah, and there are all those desert tortoise that will be moved and end up not surviving.
Nextlight does not have a chance of being approved.
How much water is used by conventional generation of electricity versus solar PV?
I think they can be creative and come up with a recovery system for the water as it drips down from the panels.
Let's see...hmmm...we will soon have our daily quota of "perfectionism fallacy" comments.
ok.. I see your point.
your numbers say that solar thermoelectric uses 156 times as much water as photo voltaic.
consider that fossil fuel thermoelectric uses a median 6 times the water as solar thermoelectic, and nuclear uses on median 16.5 times as much water as solar thermoelectic.
Therefore fossil fuel thermoelectric plants use a median 936 gallons for every 1 gallon photo voltaic uses. Nuclear uses a median 2574 gallons for every 1 gallon photo voltaic uses.
A coal plant uses as much water in a day as a photo voltaic plant uses in 3 years.
Water use is obviously a non-issue being pushed by people who are in opposition for other reasons.
Solar energy is being proposed as an "alternative" energy to burning coal for producing steam to power turbines that produce electricity. According to a 2005 DOE study, every 1000 megawatt hours of electricity produced by burning coal uses 500 tons of coal and 24 million gallons of water. Coal burning uses more water than farming irrigation in the US. Nevada's three coal burning plants can produce 6000 megawatts of electric each hour. 24 million x 6 every hour is a lot more water than a solar panel needs to be washed. CSP, concentrated solar power, that uses troughs or towers to heat water into steam will not use more water than the horrific process that contributes twice as much pollution everyday as all vehicles combined worldwide. The water argument doesn't fly, just like the argument that off-roading should be a factor in a study considering enviromental factors for building a solar plant. Let's put our people back to work! UNLV and Mass. Institute both say every 1000 megawatts of solar installed will create 6 to 9,000 jobs during contruction and 200 to 300 permanent jobs after completion. There are over 96,000 megawatts of right of way applications on file at BLM waiting to be approved. That's continuous work for generations. Right now there are 2,000 megawatts of solar projects announced and expected to start within 14 months. That's 12,000 to 18,000 jobs for 18 - 36 months, just in Nevada. Every Nevadan should get behind the push to fast-track these projects.
Comment removed by moderator. Contained an advertisement.