Las Vegas Sun

August 2, 2014

Currently: 96° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

OTHER VOICES:

A new start for the president

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

Barack Hussein Obama can begin his second term liberated by the confidence that he is already a landmark figure in American history. His task is not to manufacture a legacy but to leave his successors a nation that is more tranquil because it finally resolved arguments that roiled it for decades.

Whatever happens in the next four years, Obama will forever be our first African-American president and our first biracial president. He has won two successive popular-vote majorities. Andrew Jackson and Franklin Roosevelt, both of them icons, are the only other Democrats who managed this.

Obama fought for and signed a sweeping health care law, an accomplishment matched only by Lyndon Johnson’s Medicare. He led the country out of the worst economic calamity since the Great Depression. Restoring growth will count for more on the historical scales than petty arguments over what his stimulus program achieved. He ended one unpopular war and is preparing to close another.

What he has not done is heal our national political distemper. Indeed, his very identity — yes, as a black man, but also as someone who is urban, highly educated and culturally progressive — sometimes served to aggravate the divides in our body politic: between the North and the South, the rural and the metropolitan, the young and the old, the liberal and the conservative, the traditional and the modernist. And racism always lurked, barely below the surface, as another force pulling us apart.

The president cannot be blamed for how others reacted to him. But so many Americans, Obama included, hoped that his identity would allow him to have exactly the opposite effect: His victory in 2008 would be the occasion for putting aside our partisan rancor, our ideological rigidity, our bitter racial history. Obama wanted to be the agent of a United States of America in which the word “united” would become an accurate description of our polity.

It is a sign of just how divided we are that there is discord even on the question of how hard Obama worked to put discord aside. Many of his supporters believe he wasted far too much time trying to conciliate a Republican Party and a conservative movement that were irreconcilable. Critics to his right claim he never understood them and never reached out to them.

His program can be fairly described as moderate and market-oriented, yet conservatives insist it was and remains radical and statist.

Obama eventually decided he could govern only if he could first win a larger argument over the proper scope and central purposes of government. His re-election should have settled the matter. But will it?

Politicized redistricting and the concentration of Democratic votes in the nation’s metropolises left the House of Representatives in Republican hands. Senate rules give his opponents further blocking power. His foes are even contemplating whether bringing the government to a halt and threatening the country’s credit are legitimate means for winning a battle over budgets.

Paradoxically, the fact that Obama has shed any illusions about his unique gifts as a national healer will increase his capacity to help us leave behind many of the debates that have torn our political world asunder. Tempered by the struggles of his first term, he now seems more at ease declaring exactly what he is for and what he is seeking to achieve.

In doing so, he has already won some of the tax increases that long-term fiscal solvency requires. He has laid out proposals to curb gun violence that reflect what he wants, not what he calculates might pass. In the process, he has pushed Republicans who have genuine doubts about their party’s sharp turn rightward to begin to pull it back, to vote for measures rejected by a majority of their colleagues, and to ponder whether there are better approaches to being conservative.

The president is now free to address the needs of the poor as well as those of the middle class. He can answer the aspirations of working people battered by economic change without fearing that promoting fairness could crater the financial system by disaffecting investors. He can set about proving that a decent level of economic security and social justice can actually foster entrepreneurial dynamism, risk-taking and inventiveness. And he can demonstrate that judiciousness in using American power abroad is a precondition for preserving and enhancing it.

An Obama less burdened by what he was supposed to be has a far better chance of being the president he hoped to be.

E.J. Dionne is a columnist for the Washington Post.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 8 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Mr. Dionne is wrong. President Obama's vision for the country is a government that provides its people everything for nothing, whether they are eligible in need or not. Just ask and the government will provide. This is not a vision, it is a nightmare. It undermines the greatness of our country and our standing in the world. Do you want an insight into President Obama's thinking? Recall the open mic with Russia's Medevdev.

    CarmineD

  2. Carmine:

    Stop the negative talk already. Get over that Obama won the election and move on. Bigotry and bitterness (and constantly crabbing about Obama and his presidency) makes a person ugly inside and out. And makes you sound like a crotchety old man shaking his cane at anything he doesn't agree with or like.

    BTW - WTH are you bigots going to do when a Hispanic AMerican wins the Presidency?

  3. A new start? How about taking our Constitution and current laws seriously?

  4. Munch, you're out of line again. Carmine and the rest of us are not bigots by simply having fair-minded AMERICAN values based on the Constitution, our laws, our traditions.

  5. Det_Munch et al:

    I nailed it right on the head. All the pundits, republican and democrat, are saying President Obama's inaugural address is exactly as I said in my post above: In our face, big government in our daily lives.

    CarmineD

  6. "BTW -... what are you bigots going to do when a Hispanic AMerican wins the Presidency?" @ Det_Munch

    Depends what political party he/she is with! ;-)

    CarmineD

  7. "Sorry you had heartburn..." @ Jeff

    Words don't give me heartburn, food does. Fortunately I was not invited to lunch. At 3000 calories, each meal is enough to feed a homeless person in DC for a week. Truth be told, there was nothing on the menu that was desirable to me save the dessert.

    CarmineD

  8. "Carmine said :

    A lot of stuff the folks on the wrong side of history say." @ Jeff

    You are making stuff up by putting words in my mouth.

    CarmineD