Las Vegas Sun

November 22, 2014

Currently: 67° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

OTHER VOICES:

We’re safer than we think

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the most frequently heard forecast was: “This changes everything.”

Americans would live in constant fear of the next attack, many pundits predicted. The desire for safety would spawn a security state that would trample constitutional freedoms. The economy would take a long-term hit. American life would never be the same.

Most of those dire predictions didn’t come true, of course. The U.S. economy rebounded quickly. Civil liberties came under stress, but fears of a surveillance state weren’t realized. Fear hasn’t ruled our lives, either. Since 2007, more Americans have ranked unemployment as a bigger worry than terrorism. One reason was that it turned out terrorism, despite our fears, wasn’t really on the rise.

Terrorism wasn’t unknown in the U.S. before 2001; far from it. Anarchists and labor agitators wreaked havoc in many cities in the early 20th century. Antiwar radicals planted bombs in the U.S. Capitol in 1971. Between 1963 and 1981, one president was assassinated and two others nearly killed. From the 1960s through the 1990s, attacks were mounted by anti-Castro activists, Puerto Rican nationalists and a right-wing extremist named Timothy McVeigh, among others.

But since Sept. 11, 2001, both the number of terrorist attacks and the number of deaths from terrorism in the U.S. have declined. According to a report last year from the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, law enforcement agencies’ success rate in thwarting attempted attacks is up, as well.

From the raw numbers, a few other trends also are noteworthy. Terrorist acts by Muslim Americans, once feared as a growing problem, have declined since 2009. Instead, most of the terrorist incidents in the past decade have been nonfatal attacks by two homegrown groups with specialized concerns: the Animal Liberation Front (which targets farms and laboratories where it believes animals are being mistreated) and the Earth Liberation Front (which has set fire to construction sites it sees as encroaching on wilderness areas).

As horrible as Monday’s attack in Boston was, the kind of mass terrorism that 9/11 seemed to herald — a wave of bombings in public places — simply hasn’t happened. There have been interrupted plots — in Times Square, on airplanes — but there had been abortive plots before 9/11, too.

As political scientist John Mueller of Ohio State is fond of pointing out, Americans are more likely to die by drowning in a bathtub than from a terrorist attack, even after Boston.

So the question isn’t: Why are we in such danger? Instead, it’s: Why are we so safe?

The growing counterterrorism units of the military and intelligence community will tell you that it’s because they have spent a decade keeping al-Qaida on the run in places such as Pakistan and Yemen, and that is surely part of the answer.

The Department of Homeland Security will tell you that it’s because the federal government has poured billions of dollars into domestic intelligence, preparedness and training, and that’s part of the answer, too.

But what we know about terrorist attacks that have been thwarted during the past decade often points to lower-tech, lower-cost measures: increased vigilance by aircraft crews and passengers (the 2001 shoe bomber, the 2009 underwear bomber), increased vigilance by ordinary civilians (the 2010 Times Square bomber) and increased attention by police forces in general.

“The most important work in protecting our country since 9/11 has been accomplished with the (police) capacity that was in place when the event happened, not with any of the new capability bought since 9/11,” Michael Sheehan, a former counterterrorism chief for the New York Police Department, wrote in a 2009 book. “The big wins had little to do with the new programs.”

And there’s another factor: We’ve been lucky. Most of the potential terrorists who have been caught, Mueller notes, have been “incompetent, ineffective, unintelligent, idiotic, ignorant, inadequate (and) unorganized.”

“Al-Qaida wasn’t as good as we thought they were,” Sheehan, now an assistant secretary of defense, said this year. “(And) we are better than we often give ourselves credit for.”

Have there been mistakes? Certainly. We’ve undoubtedly spent more than necessary on homeland security, but we’ll never know which part of the spending was wasted.

Yes, there have been detentions and arrests that were unwarranted. And yes, in the most shameful chapter of the past decade, the U.S. government engaged in torture that produced little or no useful intelligence, as documented in the report of a bipartisan panel this week.

But for all that, after a decade that began in bone-cold fear, we have remained reasonably safe. The fabric of American life has been preserved. The Constitution and its guarantees are still intact.

In the wake of Monday’s tragedy, there will undoubtedly be more inspections of backpacks at stadiums and finish lines, more metal detectors and sensors. The inconveniences and indignities of air travel will continue.

But we’re safer than we think we are. For all its excesses and inefficiencies, this may be one problem big government has mostly gotten right.

Doyle McManus is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Then tell us, who should we credit for this streak of good fortune against terrorism on U.S. soil? Former President Bush and his Administration? And his creation of a new Department called Homeland Security? That would be a good start! Wonder why the columnist didn't?

    Carmine D

  2. Al-Qaeda. On 9-11-01 they reinforced some of the primary requirements for personal safety:

    1. Be aware of where you are.
    2. Be aware of WHAT is going on around you.
    3. Be aware of WHO is around you.
    4. Avoid high-risk locations or be aware of the possible consequences and consider your defensive options.
    5. Avoid high-risk activities or be aware of the possible. . .

    W's idea of protecting US citizens was to lie us into a war.

  3. Living is dangerous. Doesn't take much for a stilted developmentally-challenged angry young man or two to do a lot of damage. Sleeper cells can infiltrate and hang around for years BEFORE getting their orders to reek the damage. Sure, we don't want our kids and neighbors to dwell on the dangers but let's get realistic and secure our borders including every international airport. The State Department or DOD needs to track EVERY non-citizen who enters the country and track when he/she leaves. We have made inroads against "organized" terror groups but we keep making stupid decisions to spend $trillions and kill/maim our young troops to "prove" a point. We must learn to let other cultures live and let die, literally, EXCEPT when it threatens our physical well being. We must STOP arming rebels, allies, "friends" without benefits like Egypt, Somalia.... Stop giving samples and blue prints of our planes, drones, technology to potential enemies. Clearly, our scientists can't keep advancing faster than "leaders" give it away.

  4. "W's idea of protecting US citizens was to lie us into a war."

    Robert:

    You of all should know [think Korea and Iran and nukes] that the Intelligence Community got it wrong. And Bush followed it. To his credit Bush took the blame when it was obvious the IC was responsible.

    I might add so did the Israeli and British IC get it wrong. And all believed it. Even the mainstream media by over 70 percent. So if Bush lied, then they all did. He was wrong, yes. But then, so was everybody else too.

    Carmine D