Las Vegas Sun

July 24, 2014

Currently: 109° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

OTHER VOICES:

Winning the Yucca battle - 25 years later

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

Twenty-five years ago, on Dec. 22, 1987, Nevada’s number was up — at least we thought so. The most bombed place on Earth was slated by Congress to take another big hit in the form of becoming the final resting place for the nation’s thousands of tons of high-level nuclear waste. The Screw Nevada Bill became law, directing the Department of Energy to only consider Yucca Mountain for a national repository.

In addition to being on the western edge of the Nevada Test Site (now the Nevada National Security Site), Yucca Mountain is also beneath the Nellis Air Force Base’s test and training range. Military aircraft are tested and war exercises are carried out, often with live bombs. During a public meeting, conducted by the Department of Energy, a Las Vegas schoolteacher told the agency, “You have decided that the one place in the country where bombs are tested underground and bombs are sometimes dropped from above is the safest place to bring the most dangerous waste there is?”

After nearly 1,000 nuclear weapons were detonated over a 40-year period at the Test Site and other locations in Nevada, full-scale nuclear weapons testing was ended in 1992. But as we were to learn later, decision-makers in Congress had believed that since Nevadans had experienced and supposedly accepted weapons testing, they surely would not object to the importation of radioactive waste from weapons manufacture and all of the irradiated fuel from the nation’s nuclear power plants. They were very wrong. The first misconception was that a little radiation would be added to a lot. Not true. The radiation that would be brought to Yucca Mountain was 40 times more than the residual radiation left at the Test Site from bomb testing.

During the first session of the Legislature after the passage of the Screw Nevada Bill, a law was passed making it illegal to store or dispose of high-level nuclear waste in the state. Gov. Bob Miller sealed the state’s policy opposing a Yucca Mountain repository when he signed AB222 on July 6, 1989. Grass-roots groups formed to provide residents with opportunities to voice their opinions and show strength in numbers. Citizen Alert was the first, followed shortly by the Nevada Nuclear Waste Task Force, which is continuing the fight until the project is declared dead.

Nevadans were often characterized as being simply “NIMBYs.” — not in my backyard. It’s true that residents and elected leaders did not want the state known as the home of the nation’s nuclear waste dump, but the state’s own experts found serious problems with the site’s ability to contain the waste and protect our valuable groundwater. So, in addition to threats to tourism and our economy, it was clear that the project was also a health and safety threat that was being forced on us.

There’s no doubt that any state is at a terrible disadvantage in a battle with the federal government. Nevada was undersized in both population and clout in Washington. In addition, one of the nation’s most powerful industries was pushing Yucca Mountain — the commercial nuclear industry. One of its representatives left a lasting impression when he said at a meeting: “I don’t care where you take this stuff. Just get it away from our reactors.”

The Department of Energy was reluctant to talk about how the waste would get here, so Nevada transportation expert Bob Halstead, now director of the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects, created map packages showing the routes that waste would travel through 43 states by rail and highway if it were to be shipped to Yucca Mountain. Copies of those map packages were requested by groups representing many regions of the country. In January 1995, simultaneous press conferences were held in over 100 cities in the U.S. providing the map of each state and showing the number of trucks and trains that would be bringing tons of waste through. The theme of this effort highlighted the fact that when it comes to transportation of high-level nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain, everyone is a Nevadan. Since that time, more than 1,000 groups have signed up as opponents of the project.

After all of this time, the project is not formally dead but certainly close to it. Sen. Harry Reid and Richard Bryan, a former governor and senator, have been at the forefront of the battle since the beginning. The Obama administration has declared the project unworkable, stopping all work in 2010, and a presidential commission has released recommendations calling for any nuclear waste repository or centralized storage site to have a voluntary host state and community. It’s taken a quarter of a century, and in that time, Nevada has shown that you can indeed beat the odds.

Judy Treichel is executive director of the Nevada Nuclear Waste Task Force.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 6 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "Fortunately New Mexico will take this $100 billion project. The project was proven safe by the NRC License review

    The scientist and engineers will flock the New Mexico to help build this project." @ Future

    Perhaps there is truth in the adage that when life hands you a lemon, make lemonade. But Nevada's politicos, like Harry Reid, forgot it.

    CarmineD

  2. Enjoyed the article.

    We have won fights to stop this dump your nuclear garbage in Nevada.

    But it ain't over with yet.

    We continue to fight.

    Because the greedy people who only want money out of this are stubborn, ornery and mean. And we must continually be in their face to tell them that we don't want your nuclear crap.

    That even includes our own politicians. They ALL, don't matter which side of the aisle they belong to, need to understand if they advocate Yucca Mountain Project to happen, they will be destroyed politically. The voters of Nevada will vote them out. Period.

    Call it not fair, call it what you want. Call it justice, call it just us. Don't care. We aren't taking nuclear garbage here at a place that is only 90 miles north northwest of Las Vegas, a city of just about two million people.

    That's madness.

    And people in Nevada may be called what you want, but we ain't crazy.

  3. Nevadans have voiced a resounding "NO" to the High Level Radioactive Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain.

    It appears those in Los Alamos, New Mexico, welcome this highly toxic and hazardous waste, and are willing to take the risks. Good luck and more power to them.

    Blessings and Peace,
    Star

  4. We, Nevadans and our elected officials, talk about [lip service] diversifying our economy. Not relying just on tourism and gaming to grow the economy. Then the very first time all the states in the union hand us the possibility and potential to do so, the answer is a resounding "NO." Well, guess what Nevadans? If it were such a good industry, every state would be clamoring for it. But nuclear waste storage is not and it has risks. Life has risks. But you know the other adage oft quoted. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

    CarmineD

  5. What about the trainloads of chlorine that regularly roll thru Las Vegas? One ruptured tank car could be a very bad day for us.

  6. Southeastern New Mexico community leaders made it to the cover of Forbes magazine declaring their willingness to accept this project. It is not Los Alamos that wants it, it is Carlsbad. Near Carlsbad there is already an operating repository, 14 years of a great safety and safe-transportation record. Run by the Department of Energy.
    The Governor of New Mexico sent a letter to Secretary Chu asking for some research to be done to allow the state to judge whether or not defense heat-emittign wastes can be added to the wastes now being disposed of. But she is not the only one, it is very strong rumor that six other states and jurisdictions have also sent such letters, 4 of them volunteering salt sites, one a clay/shale site, one a site in fractured tuff (followed immediately be a letter from the state saying NO!)
    It is not inconceivable that a repository program can restart somewhere else relatively soon. Nevada was perhaps trying to protect the 'fun' image of its primary imdustry from the stain of 'risk' that comes with nuclear waste. Keep having fun, Nevada, while it lasts. In the brave new world of the rich getting richer at the expense of everyone else, who will there be that can afford a trip to Vegas to gamble when no one has a pension anymore? That is the great vision of the lords and ladies of industry: cheap labor while they work and no obligations to them once they are gone. No unions! Good luck is coming to an inevitable end, Nevada. So sad.