Las Vegas Sun

January 30, 2015

Currently: 53° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Judge to rule if sheriff, county will remain defendants in Costco shooting lawsuit


Sam Morris / Las Vegas Sun

Metro crime scene investigators, officers and detectives mill about the entrance of the Costco store in Summerlin after the shooting July 10, 2010.

Wrongful Death Lawsuit

KSNV coverage of wrongful death lawsuit in fatal Metro shooting at Summerlin Costco, June 1, 2011.

A federal judge said he’ll issue a written order in “a few days” that will determine the course of a wrongful-death lawsuit filed by the family of Costco shooting victim Erik Scott against Metro Police and Clark County.

It’s a virtual certainty the lawsuit will proceed into the discovery phase before leading to trial. The issues in today’s hearing before U.S. District Judge Edward Reed Jr. at the George Federal Courthouse were whether the county and Sheriff Doug Gillespie should remain as defendants and whether the scope of claims for damages sought by Scott’s family should be narrowed.

After the hearing, Scott’s father, William Scott said: “I’m smart enough to know there’s no certainty in a courtroom. I’m hopeful it will proceed forward.”

Scott, a 38-year-old medical-device salesman, was shot and killed by police outside the Costco store in Summerlin on a busy Saturday in July after they reportedly responded to a 911 call of a man with a gun destroying merchandise inside the store. A coroner’s inquest, siding with police testimony that Scott posed an imminent threat as he left the store, found that the shooting was justified.

Scott’s parents, William and Linda Scott, and brother Kevin Scott sued in October, alleging that the shooting wasn’t justified. The family alleged that Officers William Mosher, Joshua Stark and Thomas Mendiola, who are also defendants in the lawsuit, “engaged in an unreasonable seizure, using excessive and lethal force” against Scott that deprived him of his liberty and life in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The family argues Scott wasn’t engaged in disorderly conduct and didn’t pose a threat to anyone.

The lawsuit also accused Gillespie and the county of failing to adequately train, supervise or discipline its police officers “concerning unreasonable seizures and the use of excessive force.”

Metro conceded in a November motion and at today’s hearing through Las Vegas attorney Joshua Benson that the family has legal standing to proceed with its lawsuit based on allegations of excessive force under federal law and wrongful death under state law.

But Metro argued Kevin Scott has no standing to sue because he isn’t his brother’s heir or the administrator of his estate. Metro urged dismissal of all claims against Gillespie, and dismissal of allegations tied to what it said was the family’s attempt to collect not only wrongful death damages but damages for “survival claims.”

Benson argued survival claims shouldn’t be reserved for someone who dies as the result of alleged wrongdoing. But family attorney Ross Goodman said the lawsuit is seeking only wrongful death damages and that accusations of negligent training and supervision of officers, as well as allegations of assault, battery and emotional distress inflicted on Scott, are necessary to help prove theories of Scott’s wrongful death.

The county, through Chief Deputy District Attorney Stephanie Barker, argued to be dismissed from the case because Metro is an independent legal entity that adopts its own policies, procedures and rules. Barker told the judge that under state law the county isn’t liable for Metro’s conduct.

Costco and one of its security officers, Shai Lierly, were originally named as defendants in the lawsuit but the family later dropped them from the case. Goodman of Las Vegas has said his clients still hold the right to sue Costco in state court within a two-year statute of limitations.

Goodman told Reed the family also voluntarily agreed to drop Kevin Scott as a plaintiff. But Goodman argued the county and Gillespie should remain as defendants.

Goodman said the county has a connection to Metro by sitting on a fiscal affairs committee that helps determine the police budget and by having one of its appointed department heads, the coroner, conduct inquests into police-involved shootings.

But Barker said state law clearly says the county has no say over Metro policy. She also questioned Goodman’s logic that the county is liable because it sits on the fiscal affairs committee. She reminded the judge Las Vegas also sits on that committee, and the shooting occurred within city limits, but the city wasn’t named as a defendant.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. I did see the Coroners Inquest, it was a circus designed for one purpose, justify the shooting no matter what! This was a travesty brought on by over zealous officers who were both inadequately trained and supervised itching at the trigger. One of the shooters is already facing felony charges for other questionable actions. Gillespie should be at the top of the list with Mosher right under him. RIP Mr. Scott

  2. "Sheriff Doug Gillespie is as corrupt as the Las Vegas Police Department."

    americanborn -- but he's voted into office. Again. About the only thing to be said about the voters is "mooooooo"

    "This was a travesty brought on by over zealous officers who were both inadequately trained and supervised itching at the trigger."

    MG -- a disturbing post, but one worthy of respect, if you were actually at the inquest.

    Perhaps this all damns the body politick as much as the perpetrators. The police act on the authority we give them -- badges and guns, with the discretion to kill us. Either they need to be reined in or cut from the herd to face the consequences of this and how many other killings. If they were actually doing the job we sent and trained them to do, then the main liability does fall on us.

    "...Mr. Speaker, my subject today is whether America is a police state. I'm sure the large majority of Americans would answer this in the negative. Most would associate military patrols, martial law and summary executions with a police state, something obviously not present in our everyday activities. However, those with knowledge of Ruby Ridge, Mount Carmel and other such incidents may have a different opinion." -- Rep. Ron Paul, from a June 27, 2002, speech on the floor of the House