Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
The Mike O’Callaghan-Pat Tillman Memorial Bridge has no suicide prevention measures in place, such as a built-in fence or netting stretching below. Officials say security measures are in place, such as patrols by Hoover Dam police, who are trained in recognizing and preventing potential suicides.
By Kyle B. Hansen (contact) 
Monday, Nov. 29, 2010 | 2 a.m.
Dedication of Hoover Dam Bypass Bridge
Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player
The Hoover Dam bypass bridge is officially completed. Federal and state dignitaries from Nevada and Arizona dedicated the 1,900-foot-long bridge Thursday, October 14, 2010.
Sun archives
- Hoover Dam bypass bridge opens to traffic (10-20-2010)
- Bridging America event draws thousands (10-16-2010)
- Hoover Dam bypass bridge gets warm welcome at dedication (10-14-2010)
- Bicyclists get early glimpse of Hoover Dam bypass bridge (10-9-10)
- 2,000 bicyclists expected for Las Vegas fundraiser (10-8-10)
- Hoover Dam bypass bridge dedication planned next week (10-7-2010)
- Construction on Hoover Dam bypass bridge quickly coming to a close (8-19-2010)
- Bicyclists set to be first to cross Hoover Dam bypass bridge (5-22-2010)
- Officials reach milestone on Hoover Dam bypass (5-20-2010)
- Bridge is part journey and part destination (8-14-2010)
- Hoover Dam bypass bridge inches toward completion (8-1-2009)
- Hoover Dam bypass bridge yields new approach for big rigs (6-15-2009)
- New bridge may require more emergency services (5-22-2009)
- Worker dies at Hoover Dam bypass bridge project (11-25-2008)
To look at it is to see only majesty and grace.
The Mike O’Callaghan-Pat Tillman Memorial Bridge, the second highest in the nation, is breathtaking.
But some experts fear it is also potentially life-taking.
Nevada consistently has one of the highest suicide rates in the nation. In 2007, the most recent year that data are available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Silver State had the fifth-highest rate, with 471 deaths.
The bridge, which opened Oct. 19, stretches above the Colorado River and offers a spectacular view of Hoover Dam. It was conceived for beauty. It wasn’t designed with suicide prevention uppermost in mind.
“There was a lot of deliberation on that,” said Dave Zanetell, the bridge’s project manager from the Federal Highway Administration. “If you put a cage here, then people can go around the cage, and you’ve had an impact on the visual and historic context, so it’s kind of a delicate balance to try and find the answer.”
Alan “Lanny” Berman doesn’t buy the idea that bridge builders have to make a choice between a nice view and preventing suicide. He’s the executive director of the American Association of Suicidology.
“I’ve heard that argument for 30 years, and it makes no sense, because you can still create an aesthetically pleasing bridge,” he said. “You could have a netting underneath, I’ve seen a couple designs of that that are quite attractive; you can create a fence that is not unattractive, that people can still see through.”
While most self-inflicted deaths are caused by firearms, the ease of getting to and leaping off the bypass bridge makes deaths there inevitable, Berman said, and the bridge builder is “saying that aesthetics are more important than human life.”
Bridge officials were hesitant to talk about the issue and declined to discuss details of security plans for the structure, except to say there is a security force trained to observe pedestrians’ behavior.
Still, for some the temptation may prove irresistible.
The bridge is the only major span in the region, and all one needs to do is consider San Francisco’s famed Golden Gate Bridge to recognize the legitimacy of the suicide concern.
“Our dilemma in the Bay Area is that we’re the only bridge with sidewalks that are open to the public and therefore we experience this horrific phenomenon,” said Mary Currie, a bridge historian and spokeswoman for the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District.
As many as 7,000 people visit the Golden Gate on any given day, Currie said. The first suicide came within a year of opening. After an estimated 1,300 deaths in 73 years, bridge officials have finally approved a plan to build a suicide barrier.
“People are fascinated by structures like the Golden Gate Bridge and I think the Hoover Dam bridge is equally interesting in many ways,” Currie said.
The planned suicide barrier will be a metal net hanging 20 feet below the sidewalk, designed to catch anyone who jumps and hopefully deter people from trying, without blocking the view of motorists and pedestrians.
“The idea was to come up with a solution that would not alter the visual and aesthetic qualities of the bridge to the extent that a large barrier on top of the railing would have,” Currie said. “The net was a good compromise to come up with a good deterrent without obstructing the views.”
The net is in the final design stage, but “our main snag there is we need another $45 million in funding to build it,” she said.
The Golden Gate Bridge District has said it will not pay for the net with toll revenue, so the money must come from the federal or state government or private donations.
In the meantime, Currie said, 70 percent of jump attempts are thwarted through patrols, cameras, suicide hotline phones and help from the public.
Like the Golden Gate over San Francisco Bay, the natural beauty of the Colorado River going through Black Canyon along with the man-made wonder of the Hoover Dam is likely to draw many people to the 1,900-foot-long bridge. It’s impossible to know how many visitors to expect, but if it’s any indication, officials have occasionally had to shut down the bridge’s parking lot because of overcrowding.
“People tend to go to certain places, and a new bridge that is way off the water or the ground below it is going to be an invitation, particularly if one can access that bridge on foot,” Berman said.
The project was a group effort under the direction of the Federal Highway Administration along with the Arizona and Nevada Transportation departments; the Bureau of Reclamation, which oversees the Hoover Dam; and the National Park Service, which runs the Lake Mead National Recreation Area.
All the agencies will remain involved in maintaining and securing the bridge, officials said, with the Nevada Highway Patrol and the Arizona Department of Public Safety patrolling the roadway, and rangers from the park service also patrolling the area.
The Hoover Dam also has its own police force, and because the parking lot and interpretive plazas that lead to the bridge’s sidewalk are in the dam’s security zone, those officers will be involved in watching the bridge’s pedestrians.
“Our police force is actually on site and would probably be first responders” to any incident, said Bureau of Reclamation spokeswoman Colleen Dwyer.
And because the dam itself is a known suicide destination — 35 have died, mostly suicides but some accidental, since 1962 — the dam’s police force is “extremely well trained” in recognizing and preventing potential suicides, Dwyer said.
Dwyer also said a lot of “security infrastructure” is in place to monitor the area, but said she could not elaborate for security reasons.
Berman said such efforts might not be enough.
“To be effective, you design the bridge in such a way that you put a barrier on it that makes it impossible to jump,” he said.
In the 1980s, a suicide barrier was put on the Duke Ellington Bridge, the most popular jumping place in Washington, D.C., Berman said.
In the next seven years there were no suicides on the bridge, and a similar bridge only 100 yards away — “equally as lethal if you jump from it” — did not have a major increase in suicides. The citywide suicide rate did not go up, he said.
“Somebody can be ingenious enough probably to get over anything, but there is a lot of data worldwide that if you thwart the ability to get off that bridge ... you simply are going to save lives,” Berman said.
>>a security force trained to observe pedestrians' behavior.<<?
Any input as to what is involved in this training?
I know that my first inclination when I saw that incredible bridge...to jump.
But I'm holding out for the day that the worldwide currencies collapse...shouldn't be long now. LOL
If someone is wanting to end it by jumping, they will,,, regardless of how many safeguards you employ. If it's not a bridge, it's a building, mountain, waterfall, etc....
Here we go. The next step will be to build barriers to prevent jumping. Another project for the nanny state promoted by the Sun.
I'm with jerhig. Does the state/government have to save us from everything? I think the answer is no. Someone who wants to jump off this bridge, and is thwarted, will find another to leap from. It shouldn't be our duty or expense to find ways to make them stop attempting suicide.
The bridge does not cause people to want to commit sucide.
If we are committed to prevention, perhaps we should hire some of the 15% of Nevadans who are unemployed to work as a human chain to prevent jumpers from going over the side...
For crying out loud! If a person is intent on committing suicide, they will find a way. We cannot and should not attempt to "suicide-proof" every potential avenue a despondent person might consider. The so-called "experts" should divert their attention to more worthy considerations than this trivial one.
My first, and most long lasting, impression upon seeing this bridge is how magnificent it is. And the fact that it took just about nine years to complete. A state of the art, twenty-first century engineering marvel.
Not a platform to commit suicide from.
Most people probably agree with me that if you build something high, this may be a lure for those who want to duke themselves out. If we carry that way of thinking too far, we'll end up building stuff that is only one story high from now on...in fear that people want to commit suicide.
I really, really feel sorry for those that want to take their own lives by jumping off this new bridge, but I think the effectiveness of knocking off just about 45 minutes to one hour off of my driving time to Phoenix basically overshadows the priorities of those who exhibit self-destructiveness.
This may sound heartless, but I could care less about nets, fences, trampoulines and/or diving boards available for pedestrians on this new bridge.
The simple matter of this is that we have exploded into the new age with a magnificent piece of architecture. No one can control the very small portion of society that wishes to take their lives.
Anyways, those people can be prevented from doing this, on the most part, by other methods. Before they get the urge after seeing this new bridge. Prevention happens a lot more than the actual act itself.
Sounds heartless, but sometimes you have to grab people and drag them kicking and screaming into use and enjoyment of America's newest technology to fix and upgrade our crumbling infra-structures.
Leave it to the Government to want to 'sanitize' another issue. It's reckless, irresponsible and dangerous to publicize this subject in the first place.
I think it would be very disturbing if I were to drive over the bridge and see someone hurling themselves over the side. That would affect me forever. I don't want to see splattered people anytime anywhere. I would hate to be the person that had to go and pick up their splattered remains.
Who needs to go all the way out to the bridge to commit suicide. Just pull a butter knife on metro.
I'm with you Mr. Fletcher. However, Mr. Hansen probably had a deadline to meet for this morning's paper and nothing else newsworthy happened lately in Nevada.
Actually, they did consider suicides from this bridge and built a barrier accordingly. Look closer.
As for cost, the government takes into consideration what a life costs versus the cost of a project. Last year a life was worth $6.7 million. I'm sure many will disagree with that and say some are worth less - oh wait you did when you say a few suicide don't matter in the scheme of things, didn't you?
So how many would it take to make a difference? How many would have to die by suicide to change your mind? Are you wiling to sacrifice anyone you know or love?
I have never heard that answered?
Because mental illness affects 1 in 4 Americans and when the illness turns to crisis, suicide can occur.
Just like a diabetic coma or a heart attack from coronary artery disease.
~So why spend ANY money on suicide prevention? Why learn CPR? Why spend any money on research for medication or vaccines? Survival of the fittest is what you espouse? Why make braille books? Why use sound at crosswalks? Means prevention is no different.
~A society is judged by how they care for those who cannot care for themselves. Other countries manage to do it and quite beautifully. Look at the Golden Ears bridge in british columbia.
A barrier does not need to detract from the beauty of a bridge and if the architects are any good, they could incorporate barriers into the design very nicely.
I thought everyone in Nevada owned a gun anyway.
"In the next seven years there were no suicides on the bridge, and a similar bridge only 100 yards away -- "equally as lethal if you jump from it" -- did not have a major increase in suicides. ***The citywide suicide rate did not go up, he said.***"
Isn't this a fallacy? It didn't go down either apparently, so people were killing themselves in other ways. They were probably shooting themselves or stepping in front if trains, which is quite popular around here and unpreventable.
That's it, time to ban all bridges in America.
Americans can not be trusted not to jump off of them.
We must be protected from our own actions now!
No more tall buildings either, one story houses and buildings only. Worse they will do then is break a bone or two.
What has our country become? ; (
I guess we will have plenty of jobs now tearing down anything over 8 feet tall in this country. That should make someone happy.
Why no 'suicide prevention' on the Hoover Dam? I've thought about that before every time I've looked over that sloping mass of concrete, but you'd have a hell of a lot of skin removed before you reached the bottom. That would HURT!
Why is it up to 'us' to prevent what someone 'if they really want to do it' will do anyway? All of the cable and fences, and wires on top of the Stratosphere! The Cosmoplitan better lock all of their balcony area then and make them 'off limits' since people MIGHT JUMP? I witnessed a suicide in Waikiki, Honolulu, Hawaii, where some distraught 19 year old male, jumped from the 40th floor of the hotel near me as I was crossing the street. He landed on top of a van and killed the driver inside(flattened the roof). What a tragedy. You not ONLY kill yourself, you take out an innocent motorist, or pedestrian-how more selfish can you get?! Since I was there I had this phobia of people landing on top of me, from above for awhile. Weird!
if people want to jump we should let them. Perhaps even give them a plank to stand on so that they have a good view before they go over the edge. This protecting people from themselves is a loosing battle.
i just hate the idea vegas get their drinking water from this source and to think corpses floating in this very river is plain disgusting, im all for suicide-proof
If I wanted to kill myself, nobody could stop me. Enough with the Nanny State already.
I think Mr. Berman needs to find a real job instead of worrying about others. I was on the bridge three weeks ago and the barrier is about 4 feet high. The barrier on Hoover dam is about 3 feet high (where there have been 35 suicides). Why not add something on the dam?
There are 1 or 2 suicides in the 4 to 5 deaths in the Grand Canyon every year- need a net there too!
Wait a minute- I bet more people die driving to/from these places than have ever died committing suicide We should just close all these sites to visitors because it's just not worth the risk.
Should we also put netting around every floor of every high rise in the country?
Then put a net under it? WTF is the problem here?
About ten years ago, I saw a man jump from the side of a freeway into the path of a truck and kill himself. How could that have been prevented? I believe the only effective action would have been personal counseling, therapy, etc. by/for the individual.
The government/authorities could not, can not and should not begin to presume that it/they need to lock us all up/down/out to protect a relative few. It/they could make it easier to identify and help those relative few.
Government/authorities are part of society and it is society's responsibility to care for and protect it's members, not unnecessarily control/restrict them.
Maybe some spikes on the top of the existing fence to discourage climbers, but we can't completely "safe" this bridge or any other. The stupid & suicidal will always find a way around any barriers that go up or they'll simply go somewhere else.
The Golden Gate bridge has maintained a steady track record in this category and the Government has tried many ways to prevent it, and I'm glad they did. The Golden Gate is a work of art, not a Colosseum.
SunJon, do you mean Mausoleum?
If you really want to do yourself in and don't want the notoriety..... just before you get the Dam.... there is an overlook of Lake Mead. Unsurvivable.
This is the problem....... too many options.....this article is drivel.
It is sad when someone feels it's necessary to end their own life. Having said that I'm not terribly concerned about the lack/removal/installation of a Safety Net at this beautiful bridge. Now should those wall street banksters attempt to get their hands on my payroll tax contributions or the deficit hawks attempt to take away my Medicare that's a different story. They attempt to take away that Safety Net and I am going to be sharpening my pitchfork.
Very good point about the barrier at the dam. It's what, about 3ft high? Anyone of any stature could hop right over it. Heck, a tall person could lose their balance and fall, it's so low.
So, I agree with the previous comment. Why the scare tactics here?
Also, the first thing I thought of when I saw this headline, was, "Why even print an article like this?" Nothing like planting ideas in people's heads. Jeez.
I think it's a shame that we're becoming such a nanny state that a stunning piece of architecture might be uglified, at huge taxpayer expense, to protect one or more idiots who want to jump. As someone else pointed out, the barriers at the Hoover Dam are incredibly low, but they seem to be fine. People are responsible for their own actions, and if someone wants to jump, that's their choice.
they better have people standing by on election day 2012 because a lot of the obama cultists are going to want to jump.
I'd take anything Mr. Berman has to say with a grain of salt. He doesn't appear to be in this for the greater good....he appears to be in this for the money.
According to his organization's Form 990 (follow the link in the article to the AAS web page and then click on "About AAS - Financial Information" which will get you their 2007 Form 990. Do a Form 990 search on their EIN if you want more recent) he was paid $195,366 in last year for promoting this agenda 40 hours a week.
That's over 14 percent of the organization's ENTIRE budget. Anytime I see a nonprofit organization with executive compensation that out of whack it makes me very, very suspicious. (their total executive compensation is about 25% of their budget and is over three times the payroll for the rest of their "employees")
I walked across the bridge overlooking the Glen Canyon Dam and was disappointed that the pedestrian way was completely enclosed by chain-link. Then later I visited Hoover Dam and was surprised to see that the low wall had no barrier. Two completely different approaches on Bureau of Reclamation structures.
My preference is to have a safe observation area without obstructions. If the structure proves to be an attractive nuisance that has a large number of suicides and accidental deaths, then take measures.
I've been in high exposed places many, many times. I think almost everytime I had the thought, "What would happen if I fell or jumped?" It must be part of the human defense/survival mechanism to consider the awful consequences of carelessness or willful self-destruction.
One thing I know from these experiences is that I'd have to be in serious, serious emotional pain in order to jump to my death. I think we need to consider that the suicidal person is in so much pain that oblivion looks good. As a previous poster said, "The bridge won't cause people to jump." The emotional pain is the cause, and if that pain reaches the tipping point, a person will find a way out.
Or pull a walking stick on Metro.
Can't protect people from themselves. Suicide has been around longer than any structure, bridge, tool or weapon. "If you build it they will jump"
I don't mean to be insensitive or cynical but Pleeease!
Last week the papers reported on three people who were able to kill themselves without involving the bridge in any way. One jumped off the 19th floor of The Palms. One jumped in front of a car on the Freeway. And one hung himself from a tree near GVHS. Are we gonna do something to prevent any of these? Well, I sure The Palms will do what it can to avoid future bad press. But putting up barricades around every tree and along every inch of highway isn't going to happen.
If they want to end it, let them go..I paid and support this for our area..do we have to be concerned about every idiot who wants to end it...No way...
Do not worry so much about suicides. Give them a platform so it does not interfere with traffic.
Let them jump. At least there's no cleanup and fish need to eat too!
Great place for Bungie Jumping - whose in?
Cops are under strict orders to shoot anyone who looks like they might jump.
Thanks Charles for the research. Every 'non-profit' should have to include this kind of info (or link to it) on every solicitation they make. Until then, each of us should find this info on any 'non-profit' that we contribute to.
vii1...Fyi any drinking water extracted for Las Vegas comes from the lake. Thats the big body of water on the other side of the dam. Nobody is jumping that far.
I hope the Republicans extend unemployment, it may be the difference between life and death
The great bridge can also serve as a launching platform for a truck mounted missle. But it sure does look good.
I was surprised comments were enabled on this story.
"I hope the Republicans extend unemployment, it may be the difference between life and death"
What a pathetic statement. To assume that someone could die because they didn't get their government handout truly casts the ingenuity of the human creature in the poorest light possible.
It's Vegas just charge for the privledge.
Who's to say you couldn't jump off the Hoover dam?
I live in the SF area and I think it is ridiculous to waste such a large amount of money on a suicide barrier when the state is bankrupt, the schools are in disrepair, the water system is precarious at best, and so on.
People who want to off themselves will do it. Let's stop trying to protect people from themselves. We have people throwing themselves in front of caltrain about once a month on average, and that is way more disruptive than someone jumping off a bridge.
You don't need to jump off the bridge to commit suicide. All you have to do is eat at The Circus Circus Buffet.
Great Work Kyle, we'll chauk the first one up to you. Ain't free speech great?
there is an invention designed by a skyway bridge jumper survivor that could save the lives of bridge jumper wannabes, but those in charge of the skyway choose to ignore it. this device would work on this awesome new bridge as well. read more about this invention here: jumperpool.com/prevent.htm