Lt. Gov. challenges AG’s ability to prosecute him
Monday, March 2, 2009 | 8:21 p.m.
Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki
Sun Archives
- Krolicki pleads not guilty to felonies (12-30-2008)
- Krolicki case highlights accounting ethics issue (12-29-2008)
- Dix questions for Conrad Hafen, Chief Deputy Attorney General (12-24-2008)
- Yellow notes could help fraud charges stick to Krolicki (12-22-2008)
- Lt. Gov. Krolick says he’s an indictment target (11-24-2008)
- Guv wants Loux to pay back $64,000 (11-14-2008)
Nevada's lieutenant governor moved Monday to disqualify the state attorney general from prosecuting him on felony charges alleging he mishandled a multibillion-dollar state college savings program when he was state treasurer.
A lawyer for Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki, in a motion filed in Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, said Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto should be disqualified "based on conflicts of interests, appearance of impropriety and a violation of due process."
Attorney Richard Wright said several current and former deputy attorneys general provided Krolicki with legal advice regarding the college savings program, and Krolicki relied on that advice in overseeing the program.
"If the attorney general's office were permitted to wear the hats of prosecutor, percipient witness and legal adviser, Mr. Krolicki's due process rights and the public trust in a fair justice system would be seriously impaired," Wright wrote.
A similar motion was filed on behalf of Krolicki's chief of staff, Kathryn Besser, who also served as his chief of staff in the treasurer's office. Krolicki served two terms in that office before being elected lieutenant governor in 2006.
Attorney Linda Stiglich, representing Besser, said the attorney general's decision to prosecute the case after providing counsel is "astounding and improper." Both Krolicki and Besser have pleaded innocent to the charges.
A spokeswoman for Cortez Masto didn't immediately return a call seeking comment on the motions, filed with the court clerk late in the day on Monday.
Wright said in his motion that the attorney general has been "eloquent" in stating the duty of prosecutors to avoid conflicts of interest, and that statement "commands the disqualification of the attorney general's office and dismissal of the indictment in this case."
Wright noted that deputy attorneys general who worked with Krolicki included Conrad Hafen, the prosecutor who presented the case to a grand jury, adding, "As a matter of due process, Mr. Krolicki was entitled to a conflict-free grand jury investigation."
Krolicki, indicted in December along with Besser, is charged with two counts of misappropriation and falsification of accounts by a public officer, and two counts of misappropriation by a treasurer.
Besser is charged being a principal to misappropriation and falsification of accounts and being a principal to misappropriation by a treasurer.
The charges arose from a 2007 audit of a more than $3 billion, state-run college savings program. Auditors found Krolicki skirted budget controls and spent more on an advertising campaign than allotted by the Legislature. No money is missing and he is not accused of embezzlement.
Krolicki, a Republican who has discussed a run against U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., next year, has said the charges are politically motivated, an accusation Reid and the Democratic attorney general have adamantly denied.
From 2001 to 2006, Krolicki's office ran the Nevada College Savings Program, a public-private initiative that helped parents and students save money for school. The indictment alleges Krolicki improperly accounted for money earned by the state through contracts with Upromise Inc., the company that created the college saving accounts. The company is not accused of wrongdoing.
Prosecutors say Krolicki transferred some of the earnings to unauthorized accounts, a move that kept legislators from properly overseeing the program.
They also allege that more than $6 million in state funds was used to pay for program expenses, including advertising, management and legal services. The Legislature allocated just $1.6 million for those expenditures, according to the 2007 audit.
Krolicki appeared in ads for the savings program, leading some critics to accuse him of running state-funded campaign commercials.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Scott Disick celebrates his 29th birthday at 1 OAK in the Mirage
- HOA scandal cuts wide swath across Las Vegas Valley
- Man suffers bullet wound when stopping burglary attempt
- Photos: Surrender’s 2nd anniversary with Skrillex, ‘Le Reve,’ Paris and Floyd
- Nearly 40,000 have voted early in Clark County





Gov. Jim Gibbons says the attorney general's office should be criminally prosecuting former nuclear projects director Bob Loux, rather than defending him before the state Ethics Commission.
Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto told the governor her office was obligated to defend Loux if his actions were in "good faith" when he raised his own salary above the amount set in the law.
Masto has two standards one for confessed crook Loux and one for Krolicki and Besser.
On 12-29-2008 the LV Sun had a "Hero" piece on DEMOCRAT Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto on how she intends to raise the ethical standard. She is a straight arrow..."
What is at play here is that DEMOCRAT Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto abused her exercise of selective prosecutorial discretion. What happened to gathering the facts before a decision.
Hopefully, one day we will have an AG that represents the whole state and not just Democrats.
Clearly, she uses different standards for conflict of interest for her office and obviously is using her office to promote an agenda that favors the Democratic Party.
Sad days........
The Lt. Gov. has an excellent point. This AG is dirty.
It's Legal Ethics 101 you cannot represent a client then later work for the other side against that same client. Attorneys get disbarred from doing that.