Las Vegas Sun

December 22, 2014

Currently: 69° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Harry Reid says abuse of filibuster must end

CARSON CITY — U.S. Sen. Harry Reid today renewed his threat to go after filibuster rules that have hindered President Barack Obama’s cabinet appointments, but don’t expect him to back eliminating the filibuster when it comes to legislation.

Despite having watched Republicans scuttle gun control legislation by invoking the 60-vote filibuster rule and routinely complaining of GOP “obstruction,” Reid said he has no intention of seeking its elimination entirely.

“I said when I left for recess that I was going to work with Republicans to try to get something done and I am going to do that,” Reid said for a taping of the public affairs television program “To the Point.”

“I do know this, you cannot have — whether the new president is Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton — you can’t have a president of the United States who can’t have their team,” Reid said.

Reid and Republicans have been fighting, most recently, over the confirmation of Richard Cordray as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Reid has moved that confirmation vote to July, after the immigration debate is expected to be finished and when a renewed battle over the filibuster is expected.

But Reid was clear about the limits of his filibuster fight.

“End the filibuster? No, I don’t think we should get rid of the filibuster,” he said. “It works both ways. I’m not here beating the drum to change the filibuster for everything. It has its place, but it shouldn’t be abused.”

Reid said the key to solving what he has labeled as Republican obstruction is for the party to rid itself of so-called Tea Party Republicans.

In the wide ranging, 30-minute interview, Reid also disputed a recent claim by Sen. Bob Menendez that the Senate does not have 60 votes to pass the Gang of 8’s immigration reform bill, which passed the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.

“I talked about this to a number of my senators today, and what he wanted to say is they haven’t done a whip count on this yet,” Reid said. “I think we have 60 votes. Remember, we start out at 55 Democrats. I think the most I’ll lose is two or three. Let’s say I wind up with 52 Democrats. I only need eight Republicans, and I already have four, so that should be pretty easy.”

Reid’s full interview will air at 9:30 p.m. Saturday on Channel 3.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. How about the Senator representing the citizens of Nevada instead of the illegal invaders?

  2. Filibuster? President Obama should not be continually doing Illegal Recess Appointments to his cabinet. 2 courts have already said President Power-Grab appointments have been illegal, Supreme Court is next.

  3. We have found that President Obama's Presidency is as abusive as Nixon's Presidency. Now Harry Reid want to use the Nuclear Option. An ironic factoid of history is, Richard Nixon conceived the Nuclear Option that Harry Reid want to use to allow Obama to continue the installation of criminals into decision making positions.

    Obama is Nixon