Las Vegas Sun

September 17, 2014

Currently: 84° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

LEGISLATURE 2013:

Nevada Democrats seek ‘help’ for Nic Cage

Image

Cathleen Allison / AP

Actor Nicholas Cage testified in support of a bill proposing tax incentives to filmmakers at the Legislative Building Carson City, Nev., on Tuesday, May 7, 2013. Proponents of the measure say it will bring jobs and revenue to the state. Cage’s agent Michael Nilon is at left.

Struggling schoolchildren. Downtrodden immigrants. Uninsured working poor.

Generally, these are the constituencies for which Democrats are known for taking a public stand.

But a multimillionaire movie star?

Enter the Nevada Democratic Party and the blast email it sent to supporters Thursday morning.

“Help us help Nicolas Cage!” the email and its accompanying website blared next to a photo of a grinning Cage cupping his chin in his palm.

“Is this a parody?” one Democrat said when a reporter showed him the website Thursday morning. “This isn’t real, is it?”

Informed that the pitch was indeed sponsored by the party, the incredulous Democrat sputtered: “The optics are nuclear.”

Of course, the pitch isn’t exactly to help Cage, the Hollywood actor who has starred in 73 feature films, won one Oscar and blew a $160 million fortune on 15 homes, a private island, and a 67-million-year-old dinosaur skull, according to celebritynetworth.com.

Yes, those optics aren’t exactly ideal.

Instead, the party was ostensibly working to garner support for a bill pending in the Legislature to give the movie industry $35 million in tax incentives to produce films in Nevada. The email asked supporters to sign a petition backing the measure. Cage visited Carson City this week to testify in support of the bill.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Aaron Ford, argues the measure is a key way to diversify Nevada’s economy, create jobs and attract significant investment in the Silver State.

“I would’ve pitched it way differently,” a slightly exasperated Ford said. “This is about jobs. This is about helping our economy.

“Maybe I would have said: ‘Help us help Nic help you.’”

But the timing of the party pitch isn’t exactly ideal.

Democrats in the Legislature are working furiously to craft some way to raise taxes for education and other state services. So far, the only idea on the table is an entertainment tax that, among other things, would levy an 8 percent tax on movie tickets.

Some questioned why the party didn’t launch a petition for Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick’s proposed Entertainment and Admissions Tax.

A party operative speaking on background said the point of the email blast was “list building” — an effort to recruit supporters by using a popular, well-liked face. It’s difficult to attract attention from potential voters when no election is going on, after all.

The operative acknowledged that the email should have been worded better — perhaps by including the word "jobs."

Zach Hudson, spokesman for the state party, defended the email, saying the bill highlights the effort by Democrats to “create jobs at home while Republicans want to create jobs in China.”

Not everyone castigated the approach.

“It’s brilliant,” Sen. Tick Segerblom said. “Nic Cage is a likable figure. We’re trying to bring the movie industry to Nevada. This is about jobs.”

As for Cage’s recent financial troubles, including the $12 million debt to the Internal Revenue Service he is paying on and his foreclosed Las Vegas mansion, Segerblom said many in Nevada’s troubled economy have experienced such hardship.

“He’s just trying to find a way to get by,” Segerblom said with a touch of irony.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. No, no, no! A 1,000 times NO! Enough already with subsidizing private enterprise under any guise. That isn't capitalism - it's cronyism and it plays favorites with tax payers dollars. It creates chaos such as the housing bubble, the "green" fiasco and businessmen working harder to gain access to creepy-crawler politicians than concentrating on starting and growing their businesses in a legitimate manner. As for Cage, he could have invested his own money instead of blowing it. He's the poster boy of how not to handle finances and how to go broke. He may be famous but he's no one we should look to when it comes to incentivizing business. The better way would be to reduce taxes and red tape for all, not just a favored few.

  2. "It's brilliant," refer madness Sen. Tick Segerblom said...

  3. Coincidentally last week I met a man who told me he had moved here from LA because there wasn't enough work in the film industry as too many of the film makers are filming overseas. He reasoned that the motivation to film there was the exorbitant taxes in CA. I have read several articles about the increase in filming in Canada and some Southern/Southeastern states where the tax burden was much lower.

    I think it's a good idea to do what we can to bring film makers here as long as we don't end up losing money. Even if it were a break even proposition it would be worth while for the jobs created and to establish a foothold in the industry.

    I wouldn't automatically refuse the idea like some suggest, I would however work for a formula which allows all parties to prosper. If in order to get work we have to give the store away then I say no, but I think it's worth a try before closing the door.

  4. It's a great idea and I've seen it work in other states. Just don't cut Hollywood a break and then try to tax me more to see the end result.