Las Vegas Sun

August 29, 2014

Currently: 103° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

POLITICS:

Harry Reid’s challenge: Red-state Democrats may break with White House

Harry Reid

Harry Reid

For Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and his top lieutenants, the challenges of balancing the 2014 Senate map and President Barack Obama’s second-term agenda could cause as many headaches as anything Republicans throw at them.

Overall, 20 Democratic-held Senate seats are up for grabs next year, versus 13 for Republicans. Democratic incumbents face re-election in solidly red states such as Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, Montana and South Dakota, all of which Obama lost by double-digit margins in November.

A little more than a year after Obama is sworn in to another term, there will be high-profile Senate races in swing states such as Colorado, North Carolina and New Hampshire. One red-state Democrat — Sen. Jay Rockefeller, W.Va. — has announced his retirement, putting in play a seat that has been in Democratic hands for nearly three decades.

Although Obama is riding high in public-opinion polls — and the GOP is struggling with historically low approval ratings — senior Democratic senators and aides say the president must face a stark political reality even as he begins his second term as commander in chief. Newly re-elected and emboldened red-state Democrats, as well as senators up for re-election in 2014, want and need to show independence from the White House. For these Democrats, a visit or endorsement by Obama is not going to help them win, although they will be happy to have his money or checks from his donor network.

From guns to immigration to budget fights — especially possible cuts to Medicare and Medicaid — these upcoming battles will expose the fault lines within the Democratic Party. Obama will have to juggle the political needs of red-state Democrats even as he tries to outmaneuver a House GOP leadership pulled to the right by its hard-liners.

Reid singles out those who are up for re-election and does whatever he can to promote their agendas and protect them from politically charged votes, aides said.

“What you have in the Democratic Caucus — probably more so now than the Republican (Conference) — you have a sizable amount of moderates,” Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, up for re-election in 2014, told Politico. “We are kind of practical: ‘Let’s get things done. We’re willing to try some new stuff.’ But we’re not going to do the same ol’, same ol’. I think that’s a struggle with the administration at times.”

“We may have some other agenda ourselves,” said Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., who also faces voters in two years. “We may as a Senate decide that we want to do something about jobs. The Senate may decide it wants to do something about small business and a tax package. We may want to do something on tax reform itself. Our agenda depends on our 55 senators — (and) what we decide we want to put on the floor.”

A senior Democratic aide said the White House must recognize the “blunt political reality” that 20 Democratic senators will face re-election in a cycle in which control of the Senate is at stake.

“And if they want to actually get stuff done, they’re going to have to make an effort to work with us and personally reach out to the Mark Pryors and the Mary Landrieus and listen to those folks and make them feel heard,” the aide said. “It can’t feel like an oppositional relationship.”

The aide added: “Gun control will be a test of that. That’s going to require a lot of hand-holding.”

Although the 2014 Senate map may favor Republicans, the GOP would have to essentially run the table in six of seven red states where Democrats hold seats to win a majority. Opposing Obama on some issues may even help some Democratic incumbents, all of whom are leading or very competitive in early polls.

“To the extent that they break with the president, it could be — I don’t want to say it is — a big advantage for them in deep-red states,” a Democratic strategist said.

Several Democrats who are up for re-election and from red states told Politico they are skeptical of elements of — if not all — of Obama’s gun control agenda.

Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., who could face a tough re-election and has previously opposed reinstating the assault weapons ban, said there needs to be more emphasis on mental health issues and counseling families in crisis as well as enforcing current laws. She added it was important for Washington “not to overreact one way or another.”

Begich said, “To start saying we’re going to have more laws and more regulations, I think, would be problematic.”

Udall voiced similar sentiments, though he suggested more of an openness to tightening background checks.

“When you talk about gun rights and the situation in the West, there are very mixed feelings in terms of pushing a nationwide package — a one-size-fits-all package,” Udall said, questioning the effectiveness of an assault weapons ban.

“Everybody ought to be at the table,” said Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., who also is up for re-election in 2014. “And we ought to be talking about violent images and games. They’re readily available. We ought to be talking about mental health services and to what extent we can take a step forward and identify people who hurt themselves and others. And we need to be talking about the access to firearms that’s greater than any other developed country in the world, including some countries that are similar to us like Canada, who have much lower rates of mass killings (than) we do. So everything has got to be on the table.”

Reid must navigate these concerns within his caucus while facing pressure from liberals and gun control advocates pushing hard for every element of the president’s agenda. Senior Democratic aides expect Reid, a gun rights supporter despite recent distance from the National Rifle Association, to take the temperature of his caucus next week. Universal background checks, Senate aides say, is probably the element of the agenda most Democrats can get behind. Other than that, it’s not at all clear what Democrats will be willing to pass.

Reid said he wouldn’t stage gun votes that don’t stand a chance to pass the House. Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, has said his chamber will wait for the Senate to act before taking up the gun issue, but many House Republicans — concerned about NRA-backed primary challengers next year — would rather keep the status quo on federal gun laws.

On immigration, there’s more unanimity among Senate Democrats and Reid’s leadership team over supporting a comprehensive bill. Right now, the focus will turn to a small bipartisan group of senators trying to cut an immigration deal, and if they do, that would likely emerge as the main vehicle this year.

But the White House is expected to unveil its own sweeping immigration bill, which could be largely ignored if a bipartisan Senate deal starts to gain steam.

Added to the problems: There also are a number of senators from red and swing states who are nervous about advancing on such a polarizing issue. And there are several who hope the Senate will begin to focus on the No. 1 campaign issue in 2012: jobs.

“My No. 1 priority is jobs and the economy, and that is what I want the U.S. Senate to focus on,” said freshman Democratic Sen. Joe Donnelly of Indiana, a state Obama lost by 11 points last year. “Overall, the Senate needs to address the pressing needs of our still-recovering economy and cutting spending to get our fiscal house in order in a bipartisan way.”

Mark Udall said he welcomes tough votes on guns, immigration or revamping U.S. energy policy, but he said the economy still is the biggest issue.

“That’s what people (in Colorado) expect me to do. That’s what my reputation in part rests on,” Mark Udall said. “Anything we do that counters people’s emphasis on that, we will be punished for that, I believe. We should be criticized. Anything that we do that moves our economy forward and creates certainty (for the business community), I think we have got to be acknowledged for it, and the voters will have to decide if they’re going to reward us on Nov. 2, 2014.”

With tensions between Senate Democratic leaders and the White House still raw over the “fiscal cliff” battle, cutting spending, especially big changes to Medicare or Medicaid, will be difficult to navigate as they head into a confrontation with Republicans over raising the debt ceiling and extending government funding past the March 27 deadline.

House Republicans are planning to vote on raising the debt ceiling for three months and stop pay for members of Congress if the Senate doesn’t pass a budget, GOP officials said.

But a Reid spokesman said the Senate would consider only a clean debt ceiling bill but felt the GOP movement was encouraging.

No matter how the debt ceiling battle turns out, Obama is almost certain to face new pressure from 2014 Senate Democrats over cutting deeper into the budget.

“I’m going to underline something very strong here: The president must propose — or we should — a combination of spending cuts,” Begich said. “We cannot do this budget just on the revenue issue that we did at the end of last year.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. We'll see if Hairy is true to his pro-gun stance, or goes with the social engineer in the White House on this issue.

    We have never been able to trust Hairy in Nevada. We shall see if this will be a first.

  2. While the registering of guns and tighter background checks have high support, making it more difficult for honest, hard-working and law-abiding Americans to obtain guns for hunting, collecting or self-defense do not and those "Red" state Dumbocrats are fully aware of the danger in imposing hurdles on them. Whatever else one thinks or feels about guns, they are Constitutionally protected just as is freedom of religion, press and association and trying to nibble away at those freedoms will not sit well with intelligent and socially aware citizens. Senators and Congressmen who try, do so at their own political peril.

  3. Reid spends full-time on partisan politics and ZERO TIME on getting illegals out of Nevada.

  4. So let's get a Constitutional lawyer to explain it to AG Holder and company: you WANT local law enforcement to jump through hoops on Executive Orders (not laws) regarding gun possession but those same local law enforcement officers are not allowed to enforce the U.S. Constitution regarding illegal invasion? Where is Homeland Security?

  5. Nothing new with the red state Democrats.