Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013 | 6:14 p.m.
Facing pressure from state officials and customers, NV Energy will let ratepayers continue using old-style meters instead of switching to new digital ones.
The power company, which serves about 90 percent of Nevada’s population, said Wednesday it will offer an analog meter to customers who do not want a digital “smart meter,” which transmits power-usage data from a home or business directly to the utility.
Customers critical of smart meters have said they would rather keep their existing analog reader. But under NV Energy’s plan, those meters will be replaced with “refurbished” ones to ensure that all company readers meet industry standards for accuracy, the utility said.
NV Energy is advising customers not to call to schedule an installation, as the company must still file more paperwork with the state Public Utilities Commission. Once approved, the company said, it will contact people who have said they do not want a smart meter and set up an appointment for the new analog one.
The PUC has estimated that 4,500 consumers in Clark County and 3,000 in Northern Nevada do not want a smart meter.
NV Energy’s announcement came hours after the PUC voted 2-1 to give NV Energy more discretion in choosing an alternative meter, leaving open the possibility that customers could keep their current analog readers. In his dissent, Commissioner David Noble said the analog meters are inadequate and run slower with age.
The commission on Wednesday also OK’d lowering lowering the upfront costs for people who shun smart meters and instead want one that can only be read on site.
Southern Nevada customers who opt out will be charged $52.86 as a one-time fee and $8.82 per month during a four-year trial period. In late November, the PUC initially approved plans to charge those customers an estimated $98.75 upfront and $8.14 per month.
At the hearing Wednesday, Commission Chairman Alaina Burtenshaw said there was a “good indication” that dissatisfied customers wanted to keep their analog readers or make the company replace the smart meters with analogs.
“This is a win for the people,” Dan Jacobsen, technical staff manager for the state Bureau of Consumer Protection, said of the vote. “The commission gave them what they wanted.”
Las Vegas-based NV Energy plans to replace all 1.35 million of its analog meters with digital ones. Some 1.22 million smart meters had been installed statewide as of late November.
Nevadans have complained, with little proof, that smart meters can cause hair loss, insomnia, birth defects, DNA damage, brain-wave alteration and terrorist attacks.
An Energy Department report said many companies had not done enough to protect smart meters from hackers. Also, a branch of the World Health Organization in 2011 reportedly called radio-frequency radiation from cellphones, utility meters and other devices a “possible carcinogen.”
Sun reporter Cy Ryan contributed to this story.






First, there should be NO fee for the re-installation of equipment that customers had in the first place.
Second, can anyone truly say they trust NV Energy not to "refurbish" the meters in such a way that they result is higher readings than before?
We need a PUC that is fully accountable to the consumers and not simply an extension of NV Energy's policy committee.
@boftx,
The consumer never owns the meter, they merely allow the utility to maintain a meter on the property.
If Nevada Energy really wanted to fight this they would have prevailed.
Ultimately, I will wager that the number of people who go back to the old meters is very small. Eventually the fee's will be gradually increased that the 'victory' is a hollow one.
First, to boftx who commented above...I couldn't agree more. NV Energy never asked customers if they could install the smart meters, rather they informed the customers they would be installing the meters and that it was required when in truth it never was. With 7500 people wanting there old analog meters reinstalled at $52.86 a piece comes out to $396,450 which works out quite nicely for them. Add to it the monthly fee of $8.82 x 7500 people = $66,150 per month x 12 = $793,800 per year x 4 years = $3,175,200 that equates to extorting their customers. I didn't ask for the smart meter so reinstalling my old analog one should absolutely cost me zero!
Second, to "refurbish" the old meters before reinstallation...Really!
Third, the PUC is a joke. Just more corrupt politics to line the pockets of the corporations and their money hungry CEO's.
I didn't intend for this to be a rant but when something as blatant as this rears it's ugly head, people need to stand up against it and vocalize about it or we deserve what we ignore.