Las Vegas Sun

January 31, 2015

Currently: 52° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Services tax is dead; Democrats’ hopes for major tax reform dim

At the start of the legislative session in February, Democrats promised — at the very least — an early and public discussion on tax reform.

Beyond just a discussion, early bipartisan support seemed to be forming around a sales tax on services — potentially applying it in a revenue-neutral way by lowering the overall rate of the tax.

But with just 41 days left, Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick, D-North Las Vegas, said any effort to pass a services tax is dead and sounded less than optimistic about the chances of any kind of broad-based business tax making it to a vote.

Kirkpatrick blamed a flurry of press reports on the services tax for its demise.

“You killed it,” Kirkpatrick told a Sun reporter last week. “You got all the Democrats against me on it before I even had a chance to explore it, so I didn’t even explore it.”

The idea of expanding Nevada’s sales tax to services such as legal advice, accounting and hair dressers was originally introduced in Nevada by a Democrat last session. But in the past two years, Republicans around the country have launched an effort to move away from income taxes and toward consumption taxes such as a services tax.

Crafting a services tax also is potentially difficult because various constituencies would demand an exemption.

In an effort to potentially set the debate up for the next legislative session, the Senate is considering an interim study on creating a services tax.

Kirkpatrick said she next had hoped to have a discussion on Assembly Bill 279, a measure sponsored by Assemblywoman Peggy Pierce that would create a corporate income tax. Kirkpatrick described Pierce as “the most liberal person in this building.”

That discussion also never occurred.

“You know everything is still on the table,” Kirkpatrick said. “We still have 40 days, but you know it depends on misinformation getting out there, and people become upset and concerned, and then we don’t have the ability to have that dialogue.

“We never got to the conversation (on the services tax) because it spiraled out of control. We were going to look at AB(279), and we never got there because people across the spectrum were in fear of what it could mean.”

That doesn’t necessarily mean Kirkpatrick has dropped the idea of tax reform altogether.

Kirkpatrick remains determined to stick to her original goal of “cleaning up” the tax code by reconsidering every tax exemption or abatement on the books.

She also wants a complete overhaul of the live entertainment tax, which is rife with confusing definitions and exemptions. Her live entertainment tax measure is expected to be introduced in the coming days.

“It’s actually cleaning up the statute,” Kirkpatrick said. “There’s not a lot of options for taxes on the base when we can’t get past the conversation (stage).”

Kirkpatrick had no estimate for how much revenue her proposed changes would net the state, even as Democrats seek some way to fund an additional $300 million in education spending.

“For myself, it’s not about the revenue,” Kirkpatrick said. “It’s about a long, steady course of a tax structure that works. I’ve never looked at it as dollars. It’s policy.”

But Kirkpatrick did acknowledge the state has immediate needs.

“We probably have a billion dollars worth of things we’d like to fund,” Kirkpatrick said. “Look at our (information technology) system. Look at the infrastructure on our highways. Look at education. Look at some things within economic development. Class size reduction is a top priority.

“So we have made some huge goals on policy decisions that matter. The funding doesn’t necessarily have to be this session as much as it can be going down the road.”

Not all Democrats have given up hope that additional tax revenue can be created this session.

“I still think taxes are not off the table this session,” said Sen. Debbie Smith, D-Sparks. “We’ve committed to properly funding education this session.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. A service tax was a lousy idea in the first place because it is another regressive tax and the highest paid services (medical and legal) would probably be exempted. If you did not exempt them medical costs would increase at a time they are already skyrocketing. The cost of legal services that are usually used only when middle class families are desperate would also rise.

    In addition to go through all this just to be "revenue neutral" at at time when so many state responsibilities go unfunded was plain stupid.

  2. Here's your answer, author. No new taxes. Less government and lower taxes.

  3. Thank you, Speaker Kirkpatrick, who, "...remains determined to stick to her original goal of "cleaning up" the tax code by reconsidering every tax exemption or abatement on the books." THAT should be a major priority, given the avoidance of Nevada Lawmakers doing so for decades.

    Maybe a tax on all beverages other than water and milk, will create a revenue that will be sustainable. We might also look at adding a tax for each can, bottle, wrapper, or container of a consumable product. These type of taxes include everyone, so it would be fair. It might even create some awareness about health and the environment.

    Adequately funding our local, state, and country's infrastructure is at a crisis level, and the People look to Lawmakers to respond in a timely manner in resolving all the issues surrounding the impedence of funding the infrastructure that affects us all. Thank you for your dedicated, hard work attending to the care, safety, and welfare of the People. We are only as strong as our weakest link.

    Blessings and Peace,