Las Vegas Sun

January 29, 2015

Currently: 57° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Plan designed to ease morning lines at Regional Justice Center

Attorneys paying annual fee, jurors would use express entrance under proposal


Sam Morris

A crowd lines up for the elevators while others exit at the Regional Justice Center.

Map of Clark County Regional Justice Center‎

Clark County Regional Justice Center‎

200 Lewis Ave, Las Vegas

Monday morning at the Regional Justice Center is the usual bustle of chaos as hundreds of people — citizens reporting for jury duty, attorneys, witnesses, plaintiffs and defendants — shuffle in a long line waiting to go through metal scanners upon entering the building.

By 2 p.m., though, much of the courthouse is quiet. Seven marshals operate two scanners for a handful of people; a line of 10 people waits to pay parking tickets and other fines; of 20 rooms reserved for District Court hearings, just eight are in operation, with one court marshal assigned to each courtroom.

The morning wait in line is not pleasant, especially for people pressed to make it to court at a certain time. A few blocks away in the Clark County Government Center, a question arises: Is the problem serious enough to force the hiring of more marshals?

Marshals — they no longer are called bailiffs — work in courtrooms as security. They also operate the front-entrance magnetometers (metal detectors) and perform numerous other services. Each of the courthouse’s 32 judges is assigned a judicial marshal; an additional 18 are administrative marshals. The court also employs 10 part-time marshals.

According to county documents, however, the court is finding it difficult to hire qualified part-timers. At the same time, the court reasons in backup documents, it doesn’t have the necessary number of marshals to fill in when people call in sick or are on leave and have other absences.

So court administrators will ask county commissioners today to consider a multipronged approach that will, among other things, eliminate 10 part-time marshals to allow the hiring of three full-timers, and shift five vacant but funded positions from other Clark County departments to the court to become five more marshal positions.

With the increased staffing, the court would open the long-closed south entrance to the courthouse. That entrance would be only used by attorneys, who would pay $150 annually for the speedier entry, and jurors.

The proposal is mostly cost-neutral — Clark County would spend a relatively small amount to make the changes. The Sun reached a marshals supervisor who had not heard about the proposals; Chief Judge Jennifer Togliatti could not immediately be reached for comment.

Although most of the proposal also appears to sit well with county commissioners, one major detail isn’t going over so well.

Since 2007, Clark County government has lost about 24 percent of its workforce because of budget cuts, layoffs, buyouts and attrition. With that in mind, there isn’t an appetite right now, Commissioner Tom Collins said, to decrease the county workforce by five more positions.

“Are we going to give up vacant spots from public works or parks? Hell no,” Collins said.

He then launched a familiar argument for the Legislature to figure out ways to add more funding to the 8th Judicial Court so that “local government and the courts don’t have to get into this kind of dustup anymore.”

Instead of taking those positions from the county, Collins said, the courts should be able to figure out how to shift their own staffing to fill the five marshal positions needed to operate the southern entrance.

“They can figure out another way within their budget, within their resources, to add those five positions,” Collins said.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. So more people will get through the scanners more quickly resulting in bigger lines at the elevators - nice. How about staggering court times and then marshals/bailiffs could also be staggered for court security.

  2. "The Sun reached a marshals supervisor who had not heard about the proposals; Chief Judge Jennifer Togliatti could not immediately be reached for comment."

    Schoenmann -- you got just a small taste of what the rest of us experience there. They don't answer because they don't have to, the result of putting people in positions of public trust without meaningful accountability. Last time I was there one of the marshalls, a bald bully named Ziggy, forced me out of a courtroom without cause. I immediately found a supervisor and submitted a formal complaint. Four months later I'm still waiting for the follow-up that supervisor promised in writing.

    "So more people will get through the scanners more quickly resulting in bigger lines at the elevators - nice."

    flyinglow -- your attitude seems to be what's the problem here, that each of us is indiscriminately searched and certain personal items are seized, to enter a public building dedicated to supporting, protecting and defending our Constitutions. That includes the promise against those unreasonable searches and seizures.

    Until the Justice Center dispenses actual justice instead of "just us," and stops treating We the people like cattle, nothing will change.

    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable seizures and searches shall not be violated..." -- Nevada Constitution, Article 1 "Declaration of Rights," Sec. 18

  3. Let's get rid of Tom Collins and consolidate his district into the others. The money saved by not paying him and his staff (not to mention the money saved on the public union contracts and pay raises he votes for) would more than cover the cost of extra marshals.

  4. Maybe they should stop the inane policy of having everyone take their shoes off. That alone adds to the wait.

  5. "Maybe they should stop the inane policy of having everyone take their shoes off. That alone adds to the wait."

    Brianlv -- don't forget belts and everything in one's pockets.

    You're all still missing the threshold point -- how exactly is that screening a Constitutionally reasonable search within the meaning of our Article 1, Section 18? Or is everyone else posting here going to continue thinking like a herd instead of citizens!?

    "If the exercise of constitutional rights will thwart the effectiveness of a system of law enforcement, then there is something very wrong with that system." -- Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 490 (1964)