Las Vegas Sun

November 28, 2014

Currently: 62° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Breaking News: Bobby Hauck to resign as UNLV head football coach on Monday

ELECTION 2012:

Senate candidates seek to buck attack ads, stake out middle ground

Senate District 5, which covers a large portion of Henderson including Green Valley, has the greatest number of nonpartisan voters of any district on the ballot this year.

So both Democrat Joyce Woodhouse, a former state senator, and Republican Steve Kirk, a former Henderson city councilman, say the attacks from outside political groups that paint them as extremist are misleading.

“I’m not an ideologue,” said Kirk, who works for a document management company. “I’m a pragmatist.”

The prime example for Kirk: He supports expanding the state’s Medicaid program, a provision of the Affordable Care Act that Gov. Brian Sandoval said he’s still considering. Even many Democrats have approached that question cautiously, even though it would mean providing health insurance to some of the state’s poorest citizens.

For Woodhouse, criticism that she will be in lockstep with the teachers union is wrong, she said.

Woodhouse, a former teacher and administrator with the Clark County School District, pointed to her work during a special session to allow for student performance to be used to evaluate teachers — a policy the teachers union has in past years opposed.

Click to enlarge photo

Joyce Woodhouse

But the change allowed Nevada to compete for a federal Race to the Top grant. It was a process, she said, that was bipartisan and involved teachers, administrators and school board members.

SD5 is one of the five key state Senate races on the ballot this year that will determine which party controls the state’s upper house. Democrats currently hold an 11-10 lead, and to take control, Republicans must win four out of the five contested races.

Republicans have outraised Democrats in campaign contributions, but many of the seats favor Democrats in voter registration. In SD5, Democrats hold a 5 percentage point lead over Republicans, 40 percent to 35 percent.

Woodhouse was first elected to the state Senate in 2006 but lost re-election in 2010 to Sen. Michael Roberson, R-Las Vegas. Redistricting drew her into the new district, and when incumbent Sen. Shirley Breeden resigned, Woodhouse decided to take another run to serve in Carson City.

Woodhouse said one of her top priorities if re-elected would be to change the state’s tax structure.

“The most realistic goal for next session, No. 1, is to build a broad-based tax structure,” she said.

She said talking to businesses in her district showed her that the tax on payroll — called the modified business tax — is hurting job creation.

The Nevada State Education Association, which is supporting Woodhouse, is collecting signatures and fighting legal challenges to introduce a margins tax. She would not commit to voting for it next session. Instead, she said it should be part of the broader discussion about the state’s tax structure.

Kirk said he supports extending the sunsetting taxes, as Sandoval has proposed, but wouldn’t commit to going beyond that to raise additional revenue.

He said the state needs to review its tax structure. One proposal, he suggested, is broadening the state’s sales tax to include services, such as lawyers, accountants and hair dressers. Currently, the state sales tax is only on physical goods.

“We should review our tax structure to find something more stable,” he said.

Woodhouse, like Kirk, supports expanding Medicaid. She said those people without insurance are more likely to end up in hospital emergency rooms, where taxpayers often foot the bill.

Click to enlarge photo

File photo of Henderson Councilman Steve Kirk

Kirk framed the Medicaid expansion in moral terms.

“These are the poorest of the poor, the most vulnerable in our society who don’t have much of a voice,” he said. “Caring for people is a humanistic ideal.”

Kirk said he doesn’t support the teachers union’s proposed margins tax. While he would support more money for education if possible, it can’t be the only answer, he said.

“My opponent doesn’t offer any new solutions. Just more money, more money, more money,” he said. “That might be part of the solution. But it’s not the only solution.”

Kirk said he favors a school choice program that would include a simple way to grade schools so parents can evaluate where to send their children.

He also said he supports changing collective bargaining rules to add more accountability and eliminate “binding arbitration,” in which final disputes between employee unions and the School District are resolved by a third party.

Kirk criticized the arbitrators, who often are from out of state, for being disconnected from the broader impact of their decisions.

But Woodhouse said that the collective bargaining process has worked for years.

“The system we have can work; it will work,” she said. “I believe in the process of collective bargaining for labor peace.”

She added she would be willing to consider changes.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. I am so disgusted with our "choice" of Senate candidates this year that I didn't vote for either one when I "early voted" yesterday.

    I realize that one of them is going to be elected and my lack of vote is not going to change anything. However, good conscience won't allow me to voice my vote for either one.

  2. Steve Kirk said, "While he would support more money for education if possible," which means he doesn't support funding education but he doesn't want punished for it or any other illogical Tea Party views.
    So, he's another Senator Roberson clone.

  3. I have no use for the Tea/Republican Party.

    When I vote, THERE WILL BE a down ballot effect.

    Straight Democratic Party ticket all the way down from President Obama for another four years down to Dogcatcher General of Nevada.

    I don't care if a Nevada Tea/Republican on the ballot is a mixture of all the attributes of Mother Theresa, Father Damien, Sergeant York, and Neil Armstrong combined, I'm still not voting for him/her.

    They can all go to hell as far as I'm concerned.

    Don't sound fair, but they must pay for the constant debacle they threw this country in for the past three and half years. Not to mention the horrible Bush the Lesser years of utter incompetence and fiscal madness.