Las Vegas Sun

March 1, 2015

Currently: 61° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Another cost overrun for controversial highway irks officials


The Reno Gazette-Journal, Marilyn Newton / AP

This May 8, 2009, photo shows the Galena Creek Bridge, a 1,700-foot cathedral arch span in Pleasant Valley, south of Reno.

Galena Bridge

The Galena Creek Bridge, a 1,700 foot cathedral arch span in Pleasant Valley, south of Reno, Nev. is shown under construction in July 2011. Launch slideshow »

The state Transportation Board was caught flat-footed when it learned that $20 million could be added to the already inflated cost of the new freeway between Reno and Carson City.

"There is no excuse why this board never heard of it," said Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki, a board member.

"There were a series of poor judgments and poor decisions that were not known to the board," he told the state transportation executives.

The original cost estimate of the 8 1/2-mile freeway section in Washoe Valley was under $400 million and was scheduled to be completed in 2009. It encountered numerous problems and wasn't opened until this year at an estimated $575 million cost.

Newly installed Transportation Director Rudy Malfabon told the board Monday that the department had intended to inform the board in June but "It got lost in the shuffle."

Gov. Brian Sandoval said, "I feel we were blindsided." Board member Tom Fransway said, "This is definitely a big surprise."

Malfabon and department counsel Dennis Gallagher said there was a dispute over the price of the land taken for the project and the case went to binding arbitration.

The land owners wanted $28 million for the land and water rights. Malfabon and Gallagher said the department did not put a price on the water rights. Under questioning by the governor, they said the department never made a counteroffer.

After a five-day hearing, District Judge Brent Adams decided the land was worth about $9 million and the water rights $5 million. The department now has the water rights and will have to decide what to do with them.

There is interest on the judgment dating back to 2007, and Sandoval said the fees will be in the "seven figures," putting the total cost to the state at $15 million to $20 million.

Attorney General Catherine Cortez-Masto suggested the board be briefed in the future on pending litigation "so we would not be blindsided."

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This project was handed off... from Jim Gibbons' failed vision to Brian Sandoval's failed oversight. GOP "leadership" at its finest.

    "Did you tell him?"
    "No! Didn't you?"
    "I told you to tell him!"
    "I forgot! It got lost in the shuffle!"

    Complete incompetence.

  2. Tear it down and do it right. Few people will use it--it's a high-rise road over a valley with inherent safety issues--in climate that gets serious ice and snow. Earthquake central and you want to be on a cliff? All because a few dozen landowners preferred to keep their land instead of remaking the road that drives thru their land already.