Las Vegas Sun

September 1, 2014

Currently: 94° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Guest column:

Romney’s ideas are wrong for Nevada

Elections are always about the future. So it’s disturbing to see a candidate like Mitt Romney come to Nevada and campaign on a promise to take us right back to the past.

Nevada’s nation-leading unemployment and foreclosure rates are not a product of the last three years; they’re a product of the last decade, when so many middle-class families’ economic security slipped away as jobs went overseas, wages stalled and costs soared. Wall Street’s big, bad gambles that collapsed the house of cards and the housing market weren’t the cause of our problems — they were a symptom.

In his State of the Union address last week, we heard the president lay out a thoughtful vision of a job-creating economy built on the values that made our country great and supported by specific plans that will help families keep their homes. This week in Nevada, Romney will offer a very different, very out-of-touch vision on the toughest challenges we face.

Let’s start with the biggest: jobs. Romney claims his career in the business world as his chief qualification for office. What he doesn’t tell you is that his business wasn’t creating jobs but creating wealth for himself and his fellow corporate raiders.

All over America, Romney’s firm closed factories, laid off workers and sent jobs overseas, yet somehow managed to walk away with millions. Romney says that’s just “free enterprise.” Maybe so, but are those the priorities of someone committed to fighting for us and helping us recover or someone who wants to go right back to the way things were when Wall Street rigged the rules in its favor and the middle class paid the price?

The contrast and choice for Nevadans is just as clear on housing. When President Barack Obama visited Nevada last year, he proposed new initiatives to help struggling homeowners in the hardest-hit states keep their homes.

The last time Romney came here, he told homeowners facing foreclosure that we should stand back and let the crisis “hit the bottom” so investors can come in and make a quick buck. We would rather have a president with empathy for the people who live in those houses, not for the speculators who want to flip them. To the American people, their homes are the places where they live, raise their families and build their futures. To Romney, Americans’ homes are nothing more than Monopoly pieces to trade and make a quick buck.

At a foreclosure roundtable in Florida last week, Romney’s only contribution to a discussion on the crisis was to say banks “are feeling the same thing” as homeowners on the verge of losing their homes. Only someone who believes that “corporations are people” could compare the heartbreak homeowners are feeling with the very banks that took away their homes.

Romney’s recklessness should be of particular concern to Nevada’s Latino community. Despite all the work President Obama has done to try to pass the Dream Act, Romney promises to veto this commonsense and widely supported legislation that would let young, law-abiding immigrants, who came here through no fault of their own, earn a path to citizenship by going to college or serving in the military. Romney then took it a step further and derided it as a “handout,” as if either of those two requirements are free and easy.

Whatever your economic philosophy, there’s one position all Nevadans should let Romney know won’t fly here. After decades of hard work, the president killed the Yucca Mountain project — forever.

But Romney went to South Carolina and got the endorsement of its Tea Party governor, who said the main reason she supports Romney is because he promises to bring the proposed high-level nuclear waste dump at Yucca Mountain back from the dead.

Nevadans have a history of choosing their leaders carefully, and we should. There is so much at stake. If we respond to this crisis by trying the same failed ideas that created it in the first place, we’ll never move forward. If we follow the president’s bold blueprint and create an economy built to last, we will come back stronger than ever.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, former Gov. Bob Miller and former Sen. Richard Bryan are all Nevada Democrats.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Mitt Romney, the Alf Landon of our times.

  2. Candidate Mitt Romney's track record is reason to be cautioned.

    Nevadans must have their needs addressed and resolved. Little has be accomplished due the the bi-partisan bickering and hate mongering that used precious time in Washington, D.C. in the House and Senate.

    When corporations were voted status as a person, that was the last straw, the People of the United States lost their voice and power in government. It was the final nail in the political coffin.

    This co-authored letter points out a few salient facts, but is ever so careful about assuming any responsibility for the political and economic mess we are in.

    Blessings and Peace,
    Star

  3. Is Harry trying to tell us that he would prefer Gingrich to be the nominee?

  4. When Mitt said on CNN that he was not Concerned About The Poor it was not exactly something we had not suspected all the time. He said he's focused on the Middle Class. I think he does worry that the Wealthy have nothing left to stael from them at the current rate that they are destroying them.
    I'm not a Mormon, but I guess from looking at Mitt, that Religion does not worry about the plight of the less fortunate.

  5. newnvres,

    I'm sure you know that taken in full context Romney's comment was about focusing on the (remaining) middle class.

    My question to you is this: did you get upset over Obama's comments about staying away from Las Vegas or did you focus on their full context?