Las Vegas Sun

October 25, 2014

Currently: 69° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

County backs Metro’s request to Legislature to increase sales tax, add police

Image

Leila Navidi

Clark County Sheriff Douglas Gillespie speaks during an editorial board meeting with Las Vegas Sun staff inside his office in Las Vegas on Thursday, Feb. 17, 2012.

Clark County commissioners voted Tuesday to support Metro Police’s request to the Legislature to raise the sales tax by a quarter-cent to hire new officers.

The issue: Metro Police asked for the County Commission’s support when it goes to the Legislature to request an already voter-approved quarter-cent sales tax increase to hire new officers.

The vote: Approved 5-2, with Commissioners Steve Sisolak and Chris Giunchigliani opposed.

What it means: Metro Police will have the backing of the County Commission when it goes to the Legislature in the 2013 session to ask for a quarter-cent sales tax increase.

Voters approved a half-cent sales tax increase in 2004 to hire and equip new police officers, but only a quarter-cent of that increase has been enacted so far; legislative approval is needed before the remaining tax is levied.

The Legislature declined to enact the additional quarter-cent sales tax in 2009 and Metro did not ask for the increase during the 2011 session.

Sheriff Doug Gillespie told commissioners on Tuesday that dwindling property tax revenue and funding cuts from the county and the city of Las Vegas – which supply the bulk of Metro’s funding – have led to the department eliminating more than 300 officer positions in the past several years. Gillespie said more revenue was needed to increase staffing levels, which trail behind the national average for metropolitan police departments.

The resolution the commissioners approved Tuesday also supports Metro’s effort to change the language of the initial sales-tax increase, which would allow the department to use the funds from the sales tax revenue to replace positions that have been cut during the recession. Currently, the sales tax funding can only be used to hire officers for newly created positions.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. We don't need more sales tax. We need less government. Less government costs less, get it? Get it.

  2. This situation is caused by a decline in property tax revenue. I don't see a happy alternative. If you don't want to pay sales tax, spend less.

  3. Metro is already overstaffed. I was stopped on a Wednesday morning at 9:00 am for a "child safety seat check point" on Owens near Pecos. I counted 13 uniformed officers standing around BSing.

    Then there is the cellphone sting operations.

    And whenever I see a driver getting ticketed, there is usually two Metro cars there.

  4. Noindex: The 13 uniformed officers may have been paid via a federal grant--still our money being spent. I'd sort of like Metro to be able to maintain current staffing levels. Perhaps a modest cut in overall compensation such as employees paying half their retirement contributions. Or, better yet, a cut in compensation for all City, County, SD employees would free up multi-millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, for essential programs and/or tax cuts. Maybe we could payoff some of those bond issues and retire the bonds forever and ever.