Las Vegas Sun

August 28, 2014

Currently: 96° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

republican national Convention:

Delegation’s RNC vote further erodes Nevada party’s reputation

Image

Karoun Demirjian

Nevada delegation chair Wayne Terhune announces the Nevada delegates’ vote for Ron Paul on the floor of the RNC Tuesday evening, as members of the delegation display Ron Paul emblems and paraphernalia they snuck into the convention hall, Aug. 28, 2012.

The Nevada delegation’s demonstration for Ron Paul during the Republican National Committee roll call vote Tuesday was their way of demanding recognition and respect from the GOP.

But to much of the rest of the Republican Party, it was simply the latest reason to shed their waning shreds of respect for Nevada.

“It’s very embarrassing,” rural county chairman Wes Rice told the Sun. “We just lied. We all promised to do what we were supposed to do and didn’t do it.”

Nevada wasn’t the only state whose delegates were itching to undo the new rules on representation the Republican National Convention’s rules committee adopted last week. And it wasn’t the only state whose delegates sought to ballot Ron Paul.

But it was the only state in which delegates broke their own rules, eschewing their obligation to vote 20-strong for Romney on the first ballot, instead throwing almost all the delegation’s weight to Paul.

“The spokesman last night really betrayed our state and our party,” said Bob List, former Nevada governor and current Republican national committeeman.

Nevada’s Republicans have had several turns in the national spotlight in the past year, but each time they have walked away with their image more tarnished.

Last October, Nevada’s GOP leaders supposedly struck a gentleman’s agreement with the Republican National Committee: In exchange for dropping back in the order of early caucuses, Nevada’s delegation would get prime treatment at the RNC.

But Nevada’s disorganized February caucuses — and the 36-hour recount that followed — were enough of a fiasco that the RNC began to reconsider that deal.

It was discarded entirely after the Nevada GOP’s state party convention.

Ron Paul supporters — who had been the driving force behind the February recount — flooded the convention, successfully electing 22 members of their slate to the 25-person delegate squad and making clear that though they were bound to vote for Mitt Romney on the RNC’s first ballot, they intended to find some way of promoting Paul.

Nevada’s established Republican leaders disowned the Paulites and the state’s GOP structure as a result, setting up a parallel “Team Nevada” operation to deal with national organizers and donors.

But the Paul supporters’ cries became louder as it became clearer that Paul would be excluded from the roster of speakers at the Republican Party’s Tampa festivities.

By political party time, the Nevada delegation had been pushed to the back of the auditorium, where their microphone was kept at a low level throughout the ceremony — save for during the roll call vote that has so upset the rest of the Nevada Republican Party.

Click to enlarge photo

Ron Paul delegate Cynthia Kennedy of Nevada speaks during a protest, Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012, in Tampa, Fla. Protestors gathered in Tampa to march in demonstration against the Republican National Convention.

“In the spirit of freedom that inspired the founding of our country, and in honor of the liberty that has made these states the greatest country on earth, we proudly cast 17 votes for Congressman Ron Paul,” Wayne Terhune said, flanked by members of the delegation bearing Paul stickers and signs.

Reactions from the Republicans around them were mixed — even among Paul supporters.

“I thought it was in poor taste,” said Beth Billings, a dedicated Paul delegate from Louisiana, which was seated directly in front of the Nevada delegation. “I thought it was something Dr. Paul would not approve of.”

“But there were plenty of Mitt Romney signs, and Ron Paul was also a nominee,” said her friend Marcy Allen, also a Paul delegate from Louisiana.

Members of Tennessee’s delegation, which was seated across the aisle, were also reservedly unimpressed with the display.

“It’s not anything that accomplishes anything,” Tennessee delegate Martha Brown said. “It’s kind of a useless exercise.”

Even some Nevada Paul supporters agreed with that impression.

“There was nothing really to gain by making this statement. ... We have gained nothing, but we certainly have lost a whole bunch of credibility,” said an obviously frustrated James Smack, vice-chairman of the Nevada Republican Party and former Ron Paul supporter. “Right now I’d just like to apologize to every Republican in the state of Nevada. What happened tonight was wrong.”

But other prominent Paul supporters shunned the idea that the demonstration had caused any real damage to the party — at least not any more than already existed.

“If people were upset about what happened last night, I apologize for that,” state Ron Paul campaign chairman Carl Bunce said. “But the Nevada GOP was an embarrassment to me when I got involved. They were as corrupt as this party is at the national level.

“I’ve always seen this as a long-term goal to reshape the party. I try to respect the process until it’s disrespected. And you can only do so much when they keep pushing you back.”

But as we’ve seen, what really matters is what the national party thinks. National RNC officials declined to comment to the Sun about their impressions of Nevada’s demonstration.

Nevadans who have spoken to them, however, say that Republican leaders are aware that the Nevadans who spoke on the RNC floor do not speak for Nevada as a whole.

“They feel badly for the good state of Nevada,” List said. “They understand it was a small contingent of a minority people representing a very tiny minority of Nevada.”

“I don’t think most people were paying attention to it at all,” Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki said. “I think in some ways what occurred yesterday will provide even new momentum and cohesiveness going forward.”

Whether that is true remains to be seen. Most Paul supporters who attended the RNC remain vehemently opposed to voting for Romney. Some are even considering helping campaign against him.

But if that is the consequence of this convention, Nevada’s non-Paul supporters seem comfortable with it.

“If the [Ron Paul people] want to go their own way, good riddance,” List said. “We’ll pick up a lot more independents and conservatives to take their place.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Ron Paul is your crazy uncle. Unfortunately, some people in Nevada don't recognize that and they were attending the convention.

  2. Nate Silver thinks that Nevada could still be a swing state. After the deplorable treatment that the Nevada Republican delegation received in Florida, I don't see how they come home and work the phones for the team that changed the rules in mid-game and generally treated them like dirt. Since the Paul supporters still have control of the state level Republican party, is it possible that they submit Ron Paul's name as the Republican nominee for the Nevada ballot? Shenanigans to come, I'll grab some popcorn, this should be fun.

  3. This convention was supposed to be about nominating a presidential contender, and celebrating the eventual election of Obama's replacement.

    HOWEVER, obviously the unthinking and intellectually disaffected Ron Paul advocates thought it important to stroke their pain by casting (make that, throwing away) 17 votes that could have been used to support the GOP Candidate for President - Mitt Romney.

    So, once again we see that the "grass-roots" of the Ron Paul campaign (but NOT RON PAUL, himself) chose to INSERT some fodder for the news media to bash about, and discredit the GOP efforts to unify the GOP.

    All this, inspite of agreement across-the-board, that showing a UNITED FRONT to the American voters - at this convention - would be very substantial and important from a public perspective.

    So, it makes NO SENSE, and SERVES NO PURPOSE, other than to STROKE THEIR EGOS, for the Ron Paul deletgates from NEVADA to have shown this DISDAIN for the GOP's (and 2,000 other delegates in attendance) nominee for president - by the actions (and vote) of Ron Pauls Nevada followers.

    HOW MANY TIMES does it have to be repeated that, the only way to beat Obama in November is for all factions of the GOP to join together - and STOP the BICKERING and DISSENT.

    The idiotic GOP primary process produced enough BS for the democrats to chew on, and spew back in the GOP's face. I would ask ONE QUESTION of the Nevada supports who voted 17 votes for Ron paul as opposed to Mitt Romney.

    THAT QUESTION IS: DO YOU WANT TO WIN IN NOVEMBER OR NOT!? And maybe another question is in order; Are you Republicans OR RHINO's? Even better, are you really dedicated AMERICANS who really believe in what Conservative Republicans believe? If not, what the Hell are you doing in Tampa?

    Ron Paul supporters should know that "A house divided cannot stand" (and will not win the election). Stop this dissention, NOW. Further, I suggest that you even CHANGE YOUR 17 VOTES in favor of Mitt Romney, if for no other reason that to show you are not a bunch of mindless wildcats from the desert, and understand WHAT IS AT STAKE in this election; NAMELY, YOUR COUNTRY (or do you reject that too?).

  4. Ron Paul's supporters in the Nevada delegation are like a small child who, after being repeatedly told not to touch a hot surface, devilishly touches it, then cries about being burned.

  5. Mr. Inkwell,

    The Red Team at anycost mentality is why the Republicans keep electing guys and gals who promote more big government.

    Obama needs to win so the Republicans can shake out the establishment. The two parties don't offer a choice anymore, they are two sides to the same coin...big government = policy prescriptions for the well connected.

  6. I mean come on...

    You guys just nominated a guy who invented ObamaCare and defends it

    He hired a guy who wants to increase spending by 30 percent and pretends to be a budget hawk because he isn't asking for a 45 percent increase like Obama.

    Give me a break

  7. With no dog in this fight, I still believe the RNC brought this on themselves.

    They changed the rules, and bulldozed them through the convention.

    This is what happens when try to control democracy. It isn't pretty. The RNC acted like fascists.

    Now, I think the Paul supporters did their own bit of end run maneuvering in the state party by outsmarting the 'controllers' that expected their dictates were safe. The Paulites won that round.

    What was naive was to think the RNC wouldn't learn from that end run. They should have been expected to suppress the Ron Paul delegates.

    The fight is a tie, but also demonstrates how difficult it is to overturn the machine of a party.

    I'm sure the Libertarian's will welcome the Paul votes.