Las Vegas Sun

February 1, 2015

Currently: 59° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

City government:

Las Vegas City Council OKs $8.5 million in bonds to reopen F Street

Councilmen Bob Beers, Bob Coffin vote against bond issue


Leila Navidi

Colin Jacobs, left, and Barbara Crockett, members of the Coalition to Stop the F Street Closure march from F Street and Bonanza Road in downtown Las Vegas to City Hall to attend a redevelopment agency meeting Wednesday, January 7, 2009.

Click to enlarge photo

Las Vegas Mayor Carolyn Goodman swears in new Ward 2 Councilman Bob Beers Wednesday morning at the beginning of the Las Vegas City Council meeting. Beers won the spot in a nine-way special election March 20 to fill the seat formerly held by Steve Wolfson, who was appointed as Clark County's new district attorney.

F Street

Saul Willis has lived on the corner of F Street and McWilliams Avenue for 12 years and runs an auto repair business out of his home garage. Willis claims to not have received a letter of warning about the closure of F Street, which is less than a block away from his home. Launch slideshow »

F Street Lawsuit/Indymac Lawsuit

F Street Lawsuit, seg. 2

Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player

  • F Street Lawsuit, seg. 2
  • Indymac Lawsuit, seg. 3
  • Indymac Lawsuit, seg. 4
  • F Street Lawsuit, seg. 1

Residents fight for F Street reopening

F Street stops at the underpass of I-15 at the corner of F Street and McWilliams in Las Vegas Tuesday, December 9, 2008. Launch slideshow »

F Street March

Protesters leave from the starting point near Audrie Street and East Flamingo Road during a rally and march down the Las Vegas Strip to protest the closure of F Street in Las Vegas Saturday, April 18, 2009. Launch slideshow »

Bob Beers didn’t waste any time getting his feet wet in Las Vegas City Council politics on Wednesday. The new Ward 2 city councilman waded right into the racially charged F Street controversy.

Beers, who was sworn in Wednesday morning, voted against the city issuing up to $8.5 million in general obligation bonds to reopen F Street, which would reconnect West Las Vegas, a historic black neighborhood, to downtown.

Beers, a former Republican legislator known as a fiscal hawk, said he didn’t like the idea of tying up about $800,000 each year from the city’s general fund budget to retire the debt on the project.

"My concern is really, purely government management and is fiscal in nature,” Beers said. “This is going to be $800,000 cash flow per year for the next 10 years that the City Council will not be able to use to respond to capital emergencies."

However, the city council approved authorizing the sale of the bonds on a vote of 5-2, with Beers joined in opposition by fellow former legislator Bob Coffin, who represents Ward 3.

Today’s action follows the 2009 mandate by the Nevada Legislature that the street be reopened, with the city paying part of the costs through property taxes.

Lawmakers took that action at the urging of Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, D-Las Vegas, who said residents in West Las Vegas weren’t sufficiently notified when the Las Vegas City Council voted in 2006 to close the street as part of the job to widen I-15 from the Spaghetti Bowl to Craig Road in North Las Vegas.

After F Street was closed, some accused the city of wanting to cut off West Las Vegas from the planned Symphony Park development.

"It's a shame they plopped down Interstate 15 right smack dab in the middle of this very significant historical neighborhood in the city's history," Beers said.

Beers said he was anxious to work with Ward 5 Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow, who represents the neighborhood, to find ways to recapture the history of that neighborhood.

"I think there are ways to do it, but I can't tie up the city's financial hands like this in good conscience," he said.

Coffin also said reopening F Street would be a mistake.

"I still can't figure out why we're going to do this, even though I know there is a state statute calling for us to do that," Coffin said. Coffin said he didn't know what forces were behind the effort, saying it could be landowners or planned property transactions.

"There are things mysterious to me," he said. "And yet it still has momentum."

Coffin said he has apologized for voting for the statute in the past because he didn't know "the real truth about what happened."

Coffin said his own research showed the city and the Nevada Department of Transportation had followed the rules and procedures for notifying affected residents from downtown to the Las Vegas Speedway.

"This is only one small part of that project," he said. He said lawmakers are forcing NDOT and the city to spend still an unknown amount of money — some have estimated the finished cost as high as $70 million — "on punching a hole in that freeway."

Coffin contends D and H streets still connect the neighborhood to the downtown under the freeway.

He said NDOT designers were "color blind" when they designed the road and had no idea it would be seen as a slight felt by the people who lived in that part of town.

"What we have is a mess on our hands," Coffin said.

He said the City Council will feel repercussions from the public about the decision once the project is complete.

Barlow, who voted for reopening the street, said he disagreed with Coffin's past label of the street as "a road to nowhere."

Barlow said the neighborhood had a meeting last week where about 100 residents came out to show support for the project and "keep NDOT's feet to the fire."

He said reopening F Street will provide motorists with an alternate way to get to Charleston Boulevard through the heart of Symphony Park.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. It was a terrible mistake to close F Street in the first place - and had politicians been responsive to the people that mistake could have been avoided entirely!

    Frankly, I'm of the mind that the project could have, and should have, been altered in design - now, we're taking the appropriate corrective action at greater costs - I'm o.k. with that really!

  2. To my fellow bloggers;
    I have never been a fan of paying for the same real estate twice. How about using the money needed to open up F street, on the bullet train project? Make a deal with all the residents affected by the closure, to get a free pass to ride the train for a couple of years, in exchange for their inconvenience. Just an old,cop reflecting,
    Gordon Martines

  3. "D" Street is scarier then hell. I don't blame the area residents now wanting to use that street.

    <<How about using the money needed to open up F street, on the bullet train project? Make a deal with all the residents affected by the closure, to get a free pass to ride the train for a couple of years...>>

    Bullet train?? Are you talking about the "Train To Nowhere"??? You know, to Victorville? WHY would these people that live in that neighborhood want to ride some train to "nowhere"? It is a low income neighborhood; I doubt the residents have the money to piss away just to ride some train. How would you feel about your idea if YOU were one of the residents effected and it was YOUR neighborhood and YOU had a hard time going anywhere? Oh, that's right - you don't live in a low income neighborhood but it's okay for those who do to be inconvenienced.

  4. Ooops! Meant to say "...the area residents NOT wanting..."