Las Vegas Sun

June 4, 2012

Currently: 97° | Complete forecast | Log in

Hearing on Las Vegas ‘water grab’ begins Monday

Sunday, Sept. 25, 2011 | 2:34 p.m.

Opponents label it a “water grab” and say there’s no crisis facing Las Vegas. Supporters maintain the predicted growth of Southern Nevada isn’t being managed and the region’s economy could drop by 10 percent unless more water is imported.

The two sides square off 9 a.m., Monday, Sept. 26, on the application of the Southern Nevada Water Authority to build a pipeline to pump 125,976 acre feet of water from four valleys in rural Nevada.

The water authority maintains it will not be taking water away from any present permit holders. It is seeking the annual recharge of water above what is already allowed from the Spring, Cave Valley, Delamar and Dry Lake valleys in White Pine and Nye counties.

The hearing before the state engineer’s office will extend into November, with State Engineer Jason King possibly making a decision early next year.

The initial cost for the proposed 263-mile pipeline is $3.5 billion, but that number is expected to rise.

In practical terms, John J. Entsminger, senior deputy general manager of the authority, says pipeline construction would make the average user’s water bill rise $30 per month, which is the worst-case scenario — the scenario that presumes there would be no growth in Southern Nevada. Entsminger said UNLV estimates predict flat growth for three to five years but then increasing 2 to 3 percent annually.

There would be no increase in connection fees or the sales tax, says Entsminger.

The water authority says “the economic consequences are immense” if the Las Vegas area does not have sufficient water to meet the growth. Research shows that “even the impression of an insufficient water supply could lead to a ten percent decline in economic activity, resulting in 80,000 jobs lost,” says the authority.

The applications have drawn more than 2,000 protests.

The Great Basin Network, a coalition opposed to the pipeline plan, says the authority “lacks the financial ability and good faith intent to actually build the pipeline project and put the water to the proposed use.” It says the project would have difficulty for getting financing to meet the “astronomical costs.”

Opponents argue the water district has failed to start a number of available low-cost water conservation measures. The Sierra Club says Las Vegas is the highest per-capita water consumer of any southwestern city in the nation. The group suggests the water authority consider a desalinization project to haul water from the Pacific Ocean. Entsminger says that would add $400 million to the proposed pipeline.

The Sierra Club is also worried about the wildlife and vegetation where the water would be pumped from.

Zane Marshall, director of environmental resources for the water authority, says this project won’t turn parts of rural Nevada into a “dust bowl.” He says much of the vegetation will be replaced by other plants that don’t require as much water.

The water district is expected to take the first two weeks of the hearing presenting testimony, answering questions and undergoing cross-examination.

Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Moholland stole the water from Ownes Valley for Los Angles. Now look at the waste LA has. Take a look at Las Vegas without the water and the people waste. The people do not seem to understand the big ol bathtub we get our water from now, (Lake Mead). How do you expect them to behave with more water. Yelp!!! They will waste that too.

  2. another reason not to buy in vegas. hows that diversification working out?

  3. Las Vegas doesn't need any more additional water for the moment. 80% of our water use is for irrigation. Need to go to 100% desert landscaping.

    The water authority has to think outside the box.

  4. Desalinization could be done and just pumped to California's needs and reduce their use of the Colorado River water.

    I Have a "big tub" and I have only used it 5 times in 16 years..how wasteful.

    We give our rights for the most basic thing, water, to our government so they can do what they wish and charge us back for it. Many people working for the water district are making more money than our Governor. Does this make sense?

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.