Las Vegas Sun

August 29, 2014

Currently: 102° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Clark County, unions appeal ruling against union labor requirement

Clark County and Las Vegas construction unions are asking the Nevada Supreme Court to uphold their deal requiring that union labor be used on work to renovate the county jail in downtown Las Vegas.

Clark County District Court Judge Jerry Wiese on Aug. 17 ruled in favor of nonunion contractors in rejecting the Project Labor Agreement (PLA) for the $17.3 million first phase of renovations for the Clark County Detention center.

Wiese ruled the arrangement involving tax dollars "promotes favoritism and favors union workers and contractors over non-union workers and contractors."

Advocates of Project Labor Agreements say the deals are good for taxpayers as unions agree not to strike during construction, a concession that enables builders to meet project deadlines.

Wiese’s ruling came in a lawsuit filed against the county by Citizen Outreach Inc., dba as Nevada Business Coalition.

They sued the county April 8, charging nonunion contractors were unfairly disqualified from bidding for the work because of the union-labor requirement.

In a short court filing Tuesday, Clark County District Attorney David Roger’s office and the Southern Nevada Building & Construction Trades Council said they’re appealing Wiese’s ruling to the Nevada Supreme Court.

Attorneys for the unions have said that besides blocking strikes, the Project Labor Agreement would "effectively coordinate the various trades that will work on the project and realize efficiencies that will save taxpayers money – such as the requirement that all contractors have access to state-registered apprentices, whom can be paid at lower prevailing wage rates."

The unions have also argued the Project Labor Agreement wasn’t anti-competitive as bidding was so robust for the job that the low bid came in more than $9 million below estimates.

"More nonunion general contractors than union ones submitted bids after the PLA was included, and of the four final general contractors selected, one was fully nonunion, two were largely nonunion in their overall operations and only one was fully union," the unions said in a court filing last month. "This is fully consistent with the experience with other PLAs on Southern Nevada construction projects."

Wiese, however, found provisions allowing nonunion contractors to keep just seven core employees and hire the rest from union halls seem "to put nonunion workers at a disadvantage."

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Judge Weise voted in favor of the PLA on the first time in court and then when he got a second bite at the apple he changed his opinion. That just seems fishy to me! Same judge 2 different rulings...

  2. I don't understand why the DA is in this. I probably missed it at the start of all this.

    I also don't know why a PLA like this would be included in a state contract in a right-to-work state. That's not what I would call equal protection for all citizens.

  3. The idea is to keep the organized crime/union thugs out of Nevada as much as possable. Every little bit helps.

  4. Is this the same group that helped build The Harmon hotel? I have to say that it's not all their fault, but a major player in it. Whoever can provide quality service, hires Citizens, gives the best price, and pays a proper wage should get the job. It's simple. We want OUR money being spent properly. How much are we paying in court and legal costs for this game being played.

  5. You are right MikeM, Everyone deserves a wage package that allows you to live decent. THAT IS IF YOU EARN IT! Most union folk I know take advantage of every little thing they can not to do an honest days work. I think the unions breed laziness.