Las Vegas Sun

July 24, 2014

Currently: 109° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Sandoval adviser: Taxes a ‘last resort,’ must come with reforms

Image

AP Photo/Cathleen Allison

Dale Erquiaga, senior adviser to Gov. Brian Sandoval, gives a press briefing Friday, May 27, 2011, at the Capitol in Carson City. Sandoval and his staff are determining their options after Thursday’s Supreme Court decision preventing them from siphoning money from local government to solve state budget problems.

KSNV: Sun's Anjeanette Damon on state budget cuts

The Las Vegas Sun's Anjeanette Damon speaks with KSNV about the state budget, one day after the state supreme court ruled the state government could not take $62 million in user fees from the Clark County Clean Water Coalition for a scuttled water project. The precedent-setting decision blows a $656 million hole in Gov. Brian Sandoval's budget plan, which his advisers said Thursday night might be plugged by extending 2009 tax increases set to expire. KSNV: May 27, 4 p.m.

Click to enlarge photo

Brian Sandoval

Sun Coverage

CARSON CITY - As Gov. Brian Sandoval eeks further clarification on the effect of Thursday’s game-changing Supreme Court decision, his senior adviser said today that the governor will only consider raising the taxes set to expire in exchange for reforms of government.

Dale Erquiaga said at a news conference today that Sandoval does not support raising the complete $679 million that would come with lifting the sunsets on taxes passed in 2009. Sandoval would consider raising a portion of it.

Sandoval had campaigned and been a consistent voice against raising taxes or extending the 2009 taxes. But the Nevada Supreme Court decision to invalidate the state taking money from a Clark County water fund — which had a $62 million effect — creates an unforeseen circumstance.

The decision could put as much as $656 million in revenue that was in the governor’s budget at risk.

“The Supreme Court changed everything,” Erquiaga said. Taxes, he said, are “a last resort.”

Making an additional $656 million in cuts would mean “layoffs of hundreds of teachers ... The budget already contains difficult decisions,” he said. “We think this is a budget we can live with.”

Sandoval thinks that extending the sunsets must come with changes in how government spends money in the long term.

“It’s a last resort to go there. They have to come with reforms,” he said.

Interpreted most broadly, the Supreme Court decision means a number of budget maneuvers including taking school districts’ debt reserves and diverting property tax money from Clark and Washoe counties could be ruled unconstitutional by the court.

“That will forever change how we balance the budget in the state of Nevada,” Erquiaga said.

If the Supreme Court is interpreted narrowly and only applies to this instance, the hole could be just $62 million. In that case, “We’re back to where we were at 8 a.m. yesterday,” he said.

Sandoval’s switch on the expiring taxes is a huge step to resolving the impasse at the Legislature, where Democrats couldn’t find votes for taxes and Republicans didn’t have votes to pass Sandoval’s budget. But there are still plenty of negotiating left to do between factions, including over how much to raise in those expiring taxes, and what kind of government reforms the Legislature will pass.

Erquiaga said Sandoval still wants lawmakers to adjourn by June 6, the 120th and final day of the 2011 Legislative session.

Assembly Speaker John Oceguera, D-Las Vegas, and Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, D-North Las Vegas, have publicly expressed support for extending the taxes.

Sandoval still wants clarifications of the effect of the Clean Water Coalition vs. State of Nevada decision.

Sandoval spoke to Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto at 1 a.m. today about filing a brief with the Nevada high court asking it to clarify its intent, Erquiaga said. He has also asked Cortez Masto to prepare an interpretation of the opinion.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 8 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "The 400+/- million they found a few months ago in new revenue was the result of a renewed business faith that the government was gonna get out of their pocket a little."

    The bulk of the additional money came from a FORECAST of FUTURE revenue, not current revenue. Not only is this comment misleading, it's really, really bad spin.

    The economic forum projections included nearly $100 million in additional projected sales tax revenue... and - in particular - pointed out the increase in visitors to Nevada. The largest part of sales tax revenue and taxable sales are consumer-driven, not business driven.

    Furthermore, voting to extend the sunsets actually KEEP some tax breaks for small businesses in effect. Extending the sunsets protects those small businesses from a tax increase.

    Now, why doesn't tbvegas mention that pesky little fact?

  2. Sandoval gets all his talking points from advisors, the Koch Brothers write scripts for him. He is a sock puppet for the teabags.

  3. Actually, mred, I think you are being unkind to sock puppets.

  4. Remember the flap about "extending the Bush tax cuts...and tax predictability?" Of course, the tax cuts were set to expire, so that was "predictable."

    Now look at the mess in Nevada, we know that the courts might get involved in the budget, they did in the past when Sandoval was AG. He just wasted every one's time, and why didn't he have a "plan B?" What was the reason for the shift anyway? Why didn't he say if this doesn't work out then, blah blah..." He had no back up plan, and why did he want to mess with everything anyway? This guy does not know what he is doing, he is a simpleton.

  5. Sandoval "They have to come with reforms"; which actually means "I need sound bites that I can feed to my loyal followers who know literally nothing about which reforms work."
    To make it worse he's still being a sock puppet for Dale Erquiaga who, coincidentally, knows less than nothing about education reform.

  6. Dale and Brian are in no position to make "demands" of anyone in the legislature.Their budget they submitted and have been trying to shove down our throats was just thrown out as unconstitutional. Time to be adult and negotiate with other adults, not stamp your feet like children.

  7. Enjoyed the article that delved into the mindless machinations of Republicans in power in the Sovereign State of Nevada.

    What I came away from this article is that Mr. Dale Erquiaga is just as creepy as Governor Sandoval.

    They are definitely two peas comfortably nestled in the same pod; both having some alternate universe vision of Nevada that, when you put their combined vision down on paper, makes no sense and surely destined to fail...because the means to achieve the ends are basically impossible to use to achieve any type of goal at all.

    I say we get it over with right now and re-name Nevada to the Democratic Peoples Republic of Jones Vargas (DPRJV).

    Because that's who those two work for. They clearly don't work for Nevada.

  8. Dale worked at R & R and Howard Hughes apparently. I'm not voting for anyone connected with R & R, Jones Vargas or NPRI, guess I'll have to vote for "none of these candidates."