Las Vegas Sun

August 23, 2014

Currently: 88° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Democrats’ proposed budget compromise includes $250 million in cuts

CARSON CITY — Democrats in the Legislature are at loggerheads over how much they should concede to the governor and Republicans, now that it’s evident they won’t be able to raise taxes other than extending the 2009 increases set to expire next month.

The Las Vegas Sun has obtained a list of $250 million in cuts Democrats have agreed to in order to win Republican support. But some Assembly Democrats say these cuts go too far.

Assembly Ways and Means Chairwoman Debbie Smith, D-Sparks, acknowledged passions were running high in her caucus.

“We’re all tired; we’re all frustrated,” she said. “We’ll take everything one step at a time, one hour at a time.”

Under the proposal, the state would assume school districts would implement a 2.5 percent pay reduction for teachers and district personnel, higher education would get another trim and a variety of social services programs would be slashed.

Smith said the cuts beat “the alternative — what you see in the governor’s recommended budget.”

She said a bigger unknown than the unity of the Assembly Democrats’ caucus is the status of Senate Republicans, who still publicly have refused to negotiate.

Terms of the proposal:

• A 2.5 percent pay cut in salaries for all school employees, including teachers and administrators, saving the state $117.5 million over two years.

• Reduce basic per-pupil school support by $100 in each year, saving the state $85 million.

• Reduce higher education funding by $20 million over two years, putting the cut from 13.54 percent to 15.34 percent.

• Eliminate a senior citizens property tax assistance program with 16,609 participants who, on average, get a refund of $267 a year. It would save $1.2 million over two years.

• Not fund a portion of the self-directed autism program, saving $2.8 million.

• Reduce Medicaid and Nevada Check-Up funding by $19.3 million for the biennium. That includes a $5 per bed-day reduction for nursing homes, a 0.7 percent rate reduction for dental services, a 15 percent rate reduction for surgical centers and ambulance services, and increased costs to counties.

• Not funding subsidized child care for 295 children of people on welfare, saving $2 million.

• Reduce mental health services by $2.3 million.

• Reduce supported living arrangements for mental health services.

• Eliminate a high-intensity team to deal with those with mental health needs, saving $1 million.

• Eliminate supported living arrangements for 54 positions, saving $3 million.

• Shift costs of youth parole services to the county for about $5.5 million.

• Reduce room and board funding for youth with mental health programs, saving $1.4 million.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This still isn't any kind of legislation. This is a simple list of stuff that realy isn't on the table but they think might get voters back on their side. Its nothing! I hope no one takes this article too seriously, as not one piece of passed legislation has even had one cut in it. This is just the dems playing politics again with the pres. Every cut in the article is just about pulling the old heart strings or to piss off a union or too.