Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Monday, March 28, 2011 | 8:45 a.m.
Reader poll
Attorneys for the ACLU are suing Clark County and the state of Nevada in hopes of overturning a religious test for nongovernmental officials desiring to perform marriage ceremonies.
ACLU attorneys Allen Lichtenstein and Margaret McLetchie, suing in behalf of five individuals, filed suit in U.S. District Court for Nevada on Sunday against the county and the state.
"This is an action to address the unconstitutional policy and practice of the state of Nevada and Clark County to violate the constitutional rights of those wishing to solemnize marriages, and those wishing to get married in a place of their own choosing, solemnized by a person without religious affiliation," the lawsuit says.
"Plaintiffs allege that Nevada’s marriage solemnization provisions violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Religious Test clause of the United States Constitution, and ... the Nevada Constitution," the suit says.
State laws allow a person to obtain a certificate of permission to solemnize marriages based on the fact that he or she has a religious affiliation, the suit says.
"Similarly-situated persons without such religious affiliation are specifically prohibited from obtaining such certificate. This requirement violates both the United States Constitution and the Nevada Constitution," the suit alleges.
The suit says one of the plaintiffs, Raul Martinez, is an atheist and member of the American Humanist Association.
He has twice applied for, and been denied, a "Permanent Certificate of Authority to Solemnize Marriages" by the Clark County Clerk’s Office, the suit says.
A provision in state law regarding certificates of permission to perform marriages says in part that applications must: "Show the date of licensure, ordination or appointment of the minister or other person authorized to solemnize a marriage, and the name of the church or religious organization with which he is affiliated."
The suit says the only other individuals to whom the state will grant the authority to solemnize marriages are certain governmental officials: Supreme Court justices, district court judges, justices of the peace; municipal judges; and commissioners and deputy commissioners of civil marriages.
State law says the county shall designate and furnish a place for solemnizations conducted by the commissioners of civil marriage.
The lawsuit says two of the plaintiffs, however, are engaged to be married and: "They would like to have an outdoor secular ceremony in a romantic location of their choosing; however, because the current law grants the authority to solemnize marriages to only a handful on non-religiously affiliated state officials, they are having extreme difficulty finding a secular individual to perform their solemnization ceremony."
Attorneys for the state and the county have not yet responded to the lawsuit.
Regardless of what I think, you never can tell what side the humanist ACLU will be on, the murderer or the victom.
Good for them. If I were getting ready to marry in NV today, that would drive me to another state to do it. I do not participate in nor do I adhere or relate to any religion, even Unitarian-style deist practices, and to force me or similar thinkers to participate in a religious practice in order to marry is absurd.
The suit sounds reasonable to me. Maybe the state should grant licenses in the form of appointment to people and make them Justice of the Peace where their only application of the title would be to perform marriage ceremonies. At the same time the appointment would be for a period of 3 years where they would have to reapply for the position. Positions would be limited a certain amount so that the state isn't flooded with too many. At the same time, these Justices of the Peace would not be guaranteed reappointment unless no new applicants applied. In other words, don't expect to make a career out of this.
The ACLU is definitely right with this one. The saddest part was this suit is at all necessary.
"After coming into contact with a religious man I always feel I must wash my hands." -- Friedrich Nietzsche, 1888 "Ecce Homo - Why I Am a Destiny"
i try my best to stay away from religious folks...
there's something about them that makes me feel
uncomfortable.
like they're trying to put something over on me.
"Regardless of what I think, you never can tell what side the humanist ACLU will be on, the murderer or the victim."
That's precisely the point. People who like to quickly condemn the ACLU fail to realize that their goal is to protect the rights of everybody, from far-left liberals to the KKK. It is the rights they are concerned about, not the person or organization. Whether you love or hate the one they defend, the concern is that if the rights are violated, then those same rights are in jeopardy for anybody. I'm sure they've defended plenty of people whom they personally despise.
good. they'll win.
Thank you ACLU. Get the churches away from our freedom!
Uh oh, Sharon Angle ain't gonna like this one bit...
I am so glad to see that something is being done to protect the rights of atheists and/or secular humanists. I just read recently, that we are the third largest group of people, behind only Catholics and Baptists in size.
Yet, we are constantly being discriminated against and put down a un-American. We have the same rights under the constitution as anyone else in this country.