Las Vegas Sun

October 30, 2014

Currently: 74° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Governor vetoes bill calling for study of death penalty costs

Sun Coverage

CARSON CITY – Gov. Brian Sandoval has vetoed a bill that called for a study of the cost of the death penalty in Nevada.

Assembly Bill 501 was sponsored by the Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Election and called for the legislative auditor to examine the costs of capital cases compared to non-death penalty cases.

“This bill lacks the specificity necessary to persuade me that the outcome of the audit performed will be fair,” he said in his veto message.

There hasn’t been an execution in Nevada since April 2006. Some murderers have been sitting on death row for more than 20 years due to appeals.

The bill was approved by the Assembly 28-14 and by the Senate 11-10. The vote was along party lines with Republicans opposing the study.

The study would have included pre-trial, trial and appeal costs, plus how much it costs to keep an inmate on death row at the state prison in Ely.

The governor said, “The bill, for example, lists the costs to be assessed in determining the overall fiscal impact of the imposition of the death penalty, but it does not specify how it is these costs will be assessed.”

Sandoval also said the audit doesn't reflect the choices by individuals on death row in pursuing appeals. “Thus, because the bill fails to assure me that the outcome of the audit will be reliable and fair, I veto it,” the governor said.

Also vetoed was the bill creating the Office of Consumer Advocate in the state Division of Insurance. The governor said the goal of the bill was laudable in having a person examine the applications by insurance companies to raise rates.

“The bill, however, does more harm than good and seems to impose duplicative regulatory requirements,” he said. The commissioner of insurance is already required to examine the proposed rate increases and then make a decision on whether they are justified.

Sandoval said Assembly Bill 309 would also impose extra costs.

The governor said some proponents suggest the bill is necessary to comply with federal law, but he said compliance with federal law is possible without the bill.

The bill, sponsored by Assembly Speaker John Oceguera, D-La Vegas, was approved 33-9 in the Assembly and 12-8 in the Senate.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. So they want to spend more money trying to figure out if they can save money. Lets say there is a chance they may find out its more expensive to have a death penalty trial. Then what?

    I'll tell u what they would do at that point...spend more money on a whole seperate committee to go through all the cases to decide which ones should be death penalty cases.

    Then they will apoint another committee to make sure that it is saving money.

    Then they will want to send the death penalty inmates to college.

  2. There seems to be a legitimate argument that as it currently stands it is in fact more expensive to put someone to death that incarcerate them for life, mainly due to trial costs. That is a key issue involving our own DA right now.

    Personally, I support the concept of the death penalty, but am in favor of a moratorium until it can be proven beyond all doubt that no innocent person will be put to death. As of now that kind of proof is *very* expensive so I think the DA should pick and choose cases very carefully to be tried as death penalty cases.

  3. In Texas the average time on Death Row is 10.6 years. They get their appeals done and over with. They do not waste time keeping them housed for 20+ years before putting them to death.

    We need to review our appeal system and get it set up to get this done. No use running up costs.