AP Photo/Charles Dharapak
Tuesday, July 12, 2011 | 1:26 p.m.
Sen. Harry Reid, who once promised that he’d do everything as majority leader to prevent changes to Social Security, is willing to support changes to the program as part of a "grand bargain" to raise the debt limit.
“I’m only willing to take a look at Medicare and Medicaid if there is a grand bargain...and Social Security is the same,” Reid said Tuesday.
But then Reid acknowledged such a deal is unlikely:
“Grand bargain? Obviously there’s no need to start talking about the grand bargain because it has been trashed by (House Majority Leader Eric) Cantor and (Senate Minority Whip Jon) Kyl, and we haven’t heard any wild applause from anyone else in the Republican Party.”
Reid’s position basically hones a message President Barack Obama delivered Monday: that Democrats will deal on entitlement programs provided there’s a “big” deal on the table.
“If you’re a progressive who cares about the integrity of Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid, and believes that it is part of what makes our country great that we look after our seniors and we look after the most vulnerable, then we have an obligation to make sure that we make those changes that are required to make it sustainable over the long term,” Obama said Monday, urging Democrats -- many of whom don’t want to consider changes that will make cuts to the programs, or raise the age of eligibility. “The reason to do Social Security is to strengthen Social Security to make sure that those benefits are there for seniors.”
But while the president said wouldn’t horse-trade on entitlements for a “30-day or a 60-day or a 90-day or a 180-day temporary stopgap resolution,” Reid's threshold is more demanding: There has to be “more than $4 trillion on the table”, or he’s not willing to deal.
That puts negotiators between a rock and a hard place.
Negotiations between the president and congressional leaders, which resume at the White House this afternoon, don’t seem to be going so well. There’s a lot of ideas being tossed around, but little progress, and every evening, participating lawmakers emerge with more harsh words to throw across the aisle about the other side’s intransigence than indications that the process is moving forward.
Saturday night, House Speaker John Boehner threw a poison pill into the talks when he said that progress seemed untenable, and perhaps negotiators should take up a shorter-term resolution instead, based on the negotiations a group of lawmakers had been having under Vice President Joe Biden.
Those talks -- which, Reid noted, Republicans walked out on -- were aimed at a deal in the neighborhood of $2 billion to $3 billion.
If lawmakers go for a smaller deal, it effectively serves Reid’s interests on entitlements -- Social Security and Medicare won’t be changed if the deal stays small. But if it stays small, he’ll be forced to repeatedly contend with the whole debt ceiling morass.
After Aug. 2 - the day when Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner says the country starts defaulting - there’s still a fiscal 2012 budget to be passed. And a tax deal to be struck. And then another budget, for fiscal 2013, to be passed before the 2012 election.
That’s been Obama’s argument. “If we think it’s hard now, imagine how these guys are going to be thinking six months from now in the middle of election season where they’re all up,” he said Monday.
Still, confidence that the talks will produce a resolution was at such a nadir that senators of both parties have been unveiling alternatives.
On Monday, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, who hasn’t been participating in the White House debt talks, unveiled a proposal he says can strike a $4 trillion deal without touching Social Security.
Today, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who has been at the debt talks table, unveiled a proposal that would let Democrats and the president raise the debt ceiling, but protect Republicans politically from the process.
Under that plan, Congress would pass a “resolution of disapproval” which Obama could then veto, and if Congress failed to override that veto with a two-thirds majority (which it couldn't), Obama would have the right to raise the debt ceiling -- leaving Republicans able to say “hey, we voted against it.”
Reid said Tuesday he wasn’t ready to comment on the proposal, but he was “not going to trash it.”