Las Vegas Sun

October 31, 2014

Currently: 68° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Jon Ralston:

Culinary member Horsford steps on the Station track

It’s hard to think of any elected official closer to the Culinary Union than state Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford. It’s hard to think of any company the Culinary hates more than Station Casinos.

And therein lies the tale.

This week, Horsford was feted at the home of Dr. Jim Nave, a longtime Democratic donor and community figure (whose daughter worked for Horsford in the Legislature) who just happens to be a director of Station Casinos. At the event, Horsford, who runs the Culinary’s training academy and is a member of Local 226, also received several checks from Station executives for his congressional bid in a newly created district.

This comes against the backdrop of a renewed, intense guerrilla attack on Station Casinos by the union, which has not only ratcheted up its rhetoric but used other familiar tactics: Erecting attack websites, organizing protests and orchestrating problems in other jurisdictions (generally against the Ultimate Fighting Championship, which the Fertitta family owns).

The Culinary also has brought its campaign to make Station a union stop into the political arena, sending out a letter, which you can read on my blog, to put candidates on notice. It appears one candidate in particular did not notice this part:

“As an elected official, you stand as an example to your constituents and community. We hope you use your position to send a message against the violations of workers’ rights (at Station properties). Making a conscious decision as you plan your fundraisers and upcoming events will show those in your district who you side with.”

No between-the-lines reading needed here. This is an admonition from the Culinary to politicians: “You are either with us or you consort with Stationfolk.”

So Horsford, who is well known as the union’s favorite son, either didn’t read that letter, didn’t think such a litmus test applied here or decided it didn’t matter because he is in a 13-percentage-point advantage district.

Horsford’s campaign manager, Geoff Mackler, emailed, “Steven’s relationship remains strong, as a member of local 226, he’s behind the Culinary 100%.”

Oh? Yes, I’m sure that when Culinary officials, who declined to comment, heard about the Station money, they looked at each other, smiled and said, “Not to worry. He’s behind us 100 percent.”

Please. I am no math genius, but if a union has made its main cause to demonize-to-unionize a casino company and you decide to take money from executives of that company and have an event hosted by a company director, I don’t think that adds up to 100 percent.

To be fair to Nave, he has always backed good Democrats, and Horsford surely is that. And this was not a Station-sponsored event, although the Culinary, which has targeted Nave with one of those attack sites, may see that as a distinction without a difference.

But this is not about Nave. It is about the union trying to hold candidates’ feet to the fire and now having to decide whether to turn off the flame for an elected official who also is family.

So Horsford will have some explaining to do to the Culinary folks, especially after a legislative session in which he scuttled a hearing on a bill, SB404, that was important to the union and that Station wanted entombed. That measure, found here, would have allowed gaming regulators to take into account “discrimination in employment,” which the Culinary has alleged with federal authorities that Station Casinos has done. Union officials were furious with Horsford after they turned out members for the hearing and he canceled it; Station Casinos executives were … not so furious.

So there was lingering tension after the session, and knowing those Culinary insiders, I doubt this will help. It seems unlikely they will not still embrace Horsford, especially because he is a heavy favorite to win the race. But if they excuse Horsford, how do union leaders enforce that letter with other politicians who might have taken Station money — Rep. Shelley Berkley, for example — or have fundraisers with Station folks?

It will be interesting to see what the Fertittas do in this race as time goes on. They are Republicans and have held fundraisers for several presidential candidates. But they also give to Democrats, including Berkley, and last year, they helped Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. (Who didn’t?)

The Station clan has a longtime relationship with Danny Tarkanian, who is edging toward a bid after polling numbers showed him winning the primary (against state Sen. Barbara Cegavske) and also defeating Horsford in the general. So my guess is Horsford could not expect them to snub Tarkanian. But would the Republican Fertittas shut out Republican Cegavske in the general if she wins the primary and instead load up on Horsford?

I wonder how the majority leader’s adopted family would feel at that point.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Typical union hypocrisy. Either you're in or you're not. But if you're a supporter you can do what you want. As usual, another example why unions are only in it for the money, the dues of their members. One day, members will realize how badly they are getting screwed by the union elites and kick them out.

  2. Horsford pulled a fast one on the state's teachers during Nevada's 76th Legislative Session. The man makes it appear as if he is SUPPORTING the teachers, but as we are just now beginning to feel the effects of that session, the plight of the teachers is worse yet. It is all smoke and mirrors, folks. Just follow the money trail with Horsford, very telling.

    Nevada education was thrown under the political bus this last session. Legislators DID NOT reform nor pass any effectively meaningful TAX STRUCTURE reforms, so once again, Nevada will LACK TAX REVENUES to fund the state.

    But, hey, the politician's pockets are FULL. No worries there!

  3. In my experience The Honorable Mr. Horsford is a pragmatist. The money has run out and entitlement groups ignore this. Our main problem is our spending problem and only tangentially is it an income problem. That being said we will ALWAYS have a spending problem in Nevada. Only a pragmatic approach will choke off the inherent spending problem caused by the unending demands for more and more money by politically strong organizations. To partially cure the income problem we need to tap the income on mining which is grossly low. Mining has huge inherent costs caused by the nature of the business and it's highly skilled but intermittently employed rural personnel. Mining does not begin to address the flexing monetary costs of family welfare, rural infrastructure and the other innumerable boom and bust costs of mining (state and local). Mining companies continue to insist as they have for the last two centuries that the general populace bear the burdens caused by mining. Politicians generally lay down as fiscal door mats for the miners and ignore the fact that when the miners inevitably leave, the state will be left with depleted revenue sources and massive after costs. If we do not address these matters forthrightly in a pragmatic way; we will continue to experience massive problems with public funding.