Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Richard Wright, attorney for Dr. Dipak Desai, speaks to District Court Judge Kathleen Delaney at the Regional Justice Center Tuesday, November 15, 2011. At left is attorney Margaret Stanish. Judge Delaney set a Jan. 27 hearing date for the defense to challenge a competency finding.
By Conor Shine (contact) 
Tuesday, Dec. 13, 2011 | 12:58 p.m.
Dipak Desai
Related stories
Attorneys for Dipak Desai, the Las Vegas doctor at the center of the hepatitis scare in 2007-08, will be able to present one witness of their own to rebut findings from the state’s medical experts that Desai is competent to stand trial, a Clark County District Court judge ruled Tuesday.
Desai’s competency hearing is scheduled for Jan. 27, but on Tuesday attorneys gathered to discuss the scope of evidence that will be allowed to be presented.
Desai was initially found not competent for trial and sent to the state’s Lake’s Crossing Center for the Mentally Disabled in Sparks in March. He was released in September, with the indication that those who evaluated him had ruled him competent.
Desai’s lead attorney, Richard Wright, has contested the findings, saying that the effects of two strokes other medical ailments do not allow Desai to participate in his own defense.
Wright argued in briefs and before Judge Kathleen Delaney Tuesday that he should be allowed to present his own evidence and call his own witnesses, including possibly a neurologist or neuropsychologist, to challenge the ruling of the Lake’s Crossing doctors.
“I have the right to not only cross-examine the people from Lake’s Crossing, but (also) to present independent evidence relevant to the competency of Dr. Desai,” Wright said.
Chief Deputy District Attorney Pamela Weckerly agreed that Wright has the right to cross-examine the doctors from Lake’s Crossing, but argued that the scope of the hearing is “limited” by statute and does not allow for the introduction of outside evidence.
“To the extent the defense wants to present evidence beyond questioning the Lake’s Crossing doctors, that’s where we differ on our interpretation,” Weckerly said. “(Statute) only allows for that limited questioning of the doctors.”
Delaney said the statute covering mental competency hearings doesn’t provide specific instructions on what evidence can be excluded and ruled that Desai’s attorneys can present their own, limited findings.
“I think it is relevant and I will allow the defense to have one witness … who can similarly testify and opine as to Dr. Desai’s competency to stand trial,” Delaney said. “Any evaluations, any documentation that came into play for the doctors to make their reports is relevant, but anything beyond that will not be allowed at the time of the hearing.”
Desai, who ran the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada, and two of his nurse anesthetists, Keith Mathahs and Ronald Lakeman, were indicted by a grand jury last year on 28 criminal counts related to the 2007-08 hepatitis scare.
The felony charges include racketeering, performance of an act in reckless disregard of persons or property, criminal neglect of patients, insurance fraud, theft and obtaining money under false pretenses.
If the competency ruling stands up, Desai is scheduled to begin his jury trial before Judge Donald Mosley on March 12.
I've seen it all so many times during my career as a peace officer. While the criminal is in the act of committing crimes, they are all so bright and vigilant. However, the moment these scumbags are caught, and are going to face charges, that person becomes unstable, unhealthy, incapable of standing trial. That's a bunch of bull.
Dr. Dipak Desai committed one of the most heinous crimes that breaches a patients well being and safety. Damn this judicial system if this man is found incompetent to stand trial and is afforded the luxury of hiding out behind the staff in a state mental health hospital.
Before any person makes a comment in defense of this scumbag, consider this fact;
A local Las Vegas man went into Dr. Desai's medical facility for a colonoscopy. Some months later his wife discovered that she had contracted hepatitis from her husband. She accused him of being unfaithful. His wife divorced him and his children would have nothing to do with him . This man also lost his job due to his declining medical state. So, he lost everything of human and material value in his life.
If anyone has the right to declare not being mentally competent, it is the victims of this doctor's will to destroy the lives of his patients who trusted him.
I agree with you 100 per cent Mr. BCap.
Excuse me please meant to say Mr.BChap. Not BCap.
My mistake.