Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleJon Ralston:
Let’s recall the recalls
Friday, Aug. 26, 2011 | 2 a.m.
Recallmania is sweeping Southern Nevada, yet I find myself less than manic.
The continual effort to recall Las Vegas Councilman Steve Ross and the incipient move to oust North Las Vegas Mayor Shari Buck before her time have little in common except they are unwarranted. But in this age of Facebook and Twitter, combined with incensed folks in a shattered economy, it’s not that surprising frustration leads to anger leads to (no, “Star Wars” geeks, this is not a Yoda reference) precipitous attempts such as these.
I come not to praise Ross or Buck, but to bury the notion of recalls without proper foundation. Indeed, no one was more scathing about Ross when he thought it was kosher to concurrently be a union boss and city councilman — a blatantly unethical conflict of interest. And, as I have written, Buck’s involvement in Councilman Wade Wagner’s campaign was remarkably heavy-handed and her lamentation of Richard Cherchio’s efforts to reverse a controversial one-vote loss as taking “an emotional toll” on the city is mock-ready.
But those are not even the reasons being used to try to recall Buck and Ross. Those are significantly lamer.
The Toss Ross folks, whose latest effort fizzled and were aided by a car dealer who didn’t get his way, claim he took a pay raise after promising he would not. Well. Perhaps a recall is too meek; let us hang him for not being a politician of his word.
The newly formed Buck recall group has a list of grievances, including that Her Honor voted to close recreation centers (the horror!) and is somehow responsible for Assembly Speaker John Oceguera taking a partial salary from the city’s fire department as a lawmaker. They can’t be serious. Ah, but they are.
The issue, though, is not really about Buck or Ross, neither of who is likely to be voted into the Southern Nevada Elected Officials Hall of Fame (a rather vacant place, I acknowledge). It’s the abuse of a process erected to redress serious grievances warranting a truncation of an elected official’s term, a legitimate use of the petitioning process to short-circuit a politician who has committed misfeasance or malfeasance in office.
Instead, recalls generally are initiated against state officials by those driven by ideology to erase an opponent — hello, Wisconsin — or against local politicians by those upset with zoning matters or aggrieved by more personal affronts.
This is a subversion of the very tenets of the republic and brings a lack of seriousness to the system that could be insidious and damaging. Long after Buck and Ross have been recalled or retired, the principle will endure.
No one put it better than Troy Senik, a former Bush speechwriter, in a polemic inspired by the Wisconsin recalls but one that has broad applicability:
“For all the marvels produced by ancient Greece, one of the lessons of its system of relatively uninhibited democracy was that allowing popular passions to win the day eviscerated the capacity of lawmakers to act in the long-term interest of the public … with more time for both reflection and empirical observation, judgment may be rendered. It need not be merciful, but it should at least be deliberate.”
That is why recalls are so difficult. And they should be.
Nevada’s recall parameters are fairly liberal. The Constitution says any public officer is subject to recall after six months in office, with advocates of ouster by law forced to collect signatures from 25 percent of those who voted in the last election in 60 days. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, those strictures are hardly extreme, although some states allow longer signatures-gathering periods. (See the NCSL-compiled facts here.)
An argument could be made that Ross deserved to be recalled for accepting a union organization stewardship while he was an elected official. That was fairly outrageous. But because he went back on a promise and because some car dealer is upset, he should be defenestrated before his term expires? Please.
As for Buck, her city is going bankrupt and she will have to answer for any responsibility she has. But because she voted to close some recreation centers, she should be cashiered? I don’t think so.
As Senik intimated, passions should cool, people should cogitate and organizers should … organize. If folks are not satisfied with the performance of Buck, Ross or any other local official, take your time, find a good candidate and try to get some funding.
That’s how the system is supposed to work, even if it is made more difficult by those who want to clutch onto their elected posts by passing laws to crush opposition. But difficult does not mean impossible. And by trying to recall folks before their time, these rabble-rousers and moneyed opportunities are subverting the system they claim to cherish.
Discussion: 4 comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Upset by new regulations, L.A. porn industry flirts with Nevada
- Las Vegas’ newest headliner: Mike Tyson signs on for live, one-man ‘confessions’ show on the Strip
- A secret of how Elizabeth Halseth won her state Senate seat — Democrats
- Grubb & Ellis files for bankruptcy, will be sold
- Sworn in as new DA, Wolfson promises to hit the ground running
- Judge: Settlements reached in 41 hepatitis C lawsuits
- Families of 2010 slaying victims sue businesses
- UNLV’s Chace Stanback won’t use knee issue as an excuse for his recent struggles
- Analysts weigh in on Wynn fight with board member
- Strip Scribbles: DJ Pauly D vs. Nikki Sixx (one takes the high road)
Blogs
High School Sports Scene
High School Basketball State Championship Picks
The Kats Report
Oscar Goodman goes Shecky as Mob Museum opening prompts a mob scene (2 Comments)
Elsewhere
MGM Resorts, Ameristar form marketing alliance to draw visitors
High School Sports Scene
High School Hoops Picks: Updated with Friday's regional finals (3 Comments)
The Kats Report
What a Whitney Houston residency in Las Vegas might have looked like (5 Comments)
Elsewhere
Caesars' unit extends term loan maturity
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
As much as I typically respect Ralton's musings, I have to respectfully disagree here. Maybe for folks outside North Las Vegas the closing of rec centers and parks may seem like "no big deal", but try living in a community where public services are being gutted... And they're being gutted right after the city approved a bunch of boondoggle sweetheart deals. Residents are angry, and IMHO rightfully so. What's the point of incorporating a city if it can't even provide the most basic of services to its residents?
One recall effort (that failed), one in the process (Nye County) and one gaining steam is hardly Recallmania. Less than a full percentage of all elected officials in Southern Nevada are having to face the recall process.
The voters get to decide if this is "stupid" or not, not a newspaper.
Public service is not a right it is a privilege and it is safe to say the buck must stop here in 2011. An intervention is necessary to save the City of North Las Vegas and its resident from the failed leadership of Shari Buck. Mayor Buck has failed to serve the citizens and has neglected to provide leadership, vision and ethical professionalism in her administration. The following is just a glimpse of her incompetency or unwillingness to be transparent as to what her strategic plan is for the City of North Las Vegas. Has she put forth any written plans for our city that provides a way to measure our progress, evaluate outcomes with the goal to push every aspect of city government to be held accountable and be more sustainable?
Since taking office has Mayor Buck establish policies to help prepare the city for the financial downturn that had already begun when she was elected mayor?
Has she been able to make budget cuts without significantly impacting essential services or public safety? No, but other Mayor's in Southern Nevada have.
The time for second and fourth chances are over, optimistic dreams don't pay the bills- to many families are hurting at the hands of "Blame it on everyone but me Buck"!
Tim Hacker was fired as the City Manager of Mesquite essentially for using poor professional judgment and mishandling of a land deal with the City and private developers that will have devastating financial consequences on the City of Mesquite and its residents. Mayor Buck missed yet another opportunity to do the right thing by not hiring a City Manager with a proven successful track record and professional ethics.
She (Mayor Buck) blamed the city's financial hardships on "losing $100 million in C-Tax over the past five years."
City governments just like any other organization has lobbyist not to mention local elected officials themselves travel to Carson City to fight and lobby for their Cities interest. Why is she telling citizens to call now that the session is over, where was this call for activism when it could have mattered. Passing the buck seems to be her only solution to the budget crisis. Has anyone heard the Mayor of Henderson blaming State leaders? Has anyone heard of drastic changes to the quality of life for the residents of Henderson whose city council cut over 90 million dollars to balance their city budget?
There are many more reasons she deserves to be recalled- not just dismantling the community by closing recreation centers or poor decision making with funding. It's about giving a lot of lip service. It's about not doing better planning, waiting instead of being pro-active and not taking a hard line against bargaining units who didn't make the same level of sacrifice as other units did- to keep families who live in North Las Vegas from suffering even more.
I think that the NLV citizens are so disgusted with Shari Buck, that giving her the heave out the door would be an uplifting event in an otherwise dismal climate for NLV residents. Buck is a heavy handed type of person, who self deals the political candy to herself, and the police and fire fighters unions. She will sacrifice the basic amenities for which NLV residents pay high taxes, and get nothing but dust in return. It's time for Buck to eat the dust for a change, so Jon,I have to disagree with your basic negativity on the Buck recall--some things are just plain healthy for a community's morale--recalling Buck is one of them!
North Las Vegas typically has the least amenities of any of our valley's cities and they're usually last to get it, too. So yes, it's a big deal when one of the few free services they have are taken away. Also consider that recreation centers were one of the few free resources families had to keep children occupied and out of trouble.
Take a look at what Henderson has to offer their residents compared to what NLV has; the difference is astounding and pathetic, especially when one considers that the median income in Henderson is almost $20k more than it is in NLV. I'm not saying Henderson shouldn't have their services - I'm saying there should be equity in public programs.