Saturday, April 9, 2011 | 2 a.m.
Heather Murren
Michael Yackira
Sun archives
- Nevada Cancer Institute laying off staff, refining mission for future (4-8-2011)
- Nevada Cancer Institute director leaves post (4-1-2011)
- New director could be a boon to Nevada Cancer Institute (2--2009)
- Nevada Cancer Institute receives $20 million donation (9-16-2008)
- Nevada Cancer Institute gets accreditation (9-8-2008)
Related link
Like other nonprofit organizations suffering from the recession, the financially beleaguered Nevada Cancer Institute is having to reshape and refine how it funds and executes its mission.
It’s not alone in the world of nonprofit foundations and health-related organizations, which are having to adjust to reduced levels of philanthropy.
In the immediate term, the Nevada Cancer Institute, whose presence elevated the quality and reputation of health care in Las Vegas, is laying off about half of its staff of 330 employees, the result of diminished charitable giving from corporate and private sources.
Those cutbacks will come primarily from the administrative, education and community outreach areas, as well as research that has only begun.
But its executives emphasize that the institute will remain true to its core mission — to treat cancer patients and pursue more fully developed research that will help improve treatments. To that end, the center will retain doctors, nurses, technicians and related staff to continue the treatment of patients in various stages of the disease.
“We can be very proud of what we’ve accomplished so far,” said Heather Murren, a longtime Wall Street financial analyst who, with her husband, Jim Murren, chairman and CEO of MGM Resorts International, founded the Nevada Cancer Institute. “The question now is, where do we go from here? We will distill to our essence and carry forward. The emphasis is on maintaining staff that deals with patients and the research that is essential for those patients.”
Severing half the workforce was necessary to preserve the mission, she said, noting that the organization has hired a restructuring expert to aid the effort. “We need to make some very significant decisions at the Cancer Institute in light of the environment we’re operating in,” she said.
The Summerlin-based cancer treatment and research facility, which has treated about 15,000 patients since its 2005 opening, has experienced a decline in federal grant dollars and individual donations. The facility has raised $240 million in philanthropic giving to date, peaking at $58.1 million in 2006.
The institute has decided to postpone efforts to receive Comprehensive Cancer Center status from the National Cancer Institute, a move that would give the Las Vegas facility a significant boost in federal research dollars and the hiring of world-class talent.
Murren and board Chairman Michael Yackira, president and CEO of NV Energy, said they were working to determine where to turn for money.
“By right-sizing the organization, we will be in a position to continue,” Yackira said. “Our mission will be preserved and 10 years from now we’ll look back at this as a difficult time. We will flourish.”
The search for new funding sources won’t be easy, said Sharon Bond, a spokeswoman for the Giving USA Foundation, which tracks philanthropy.
“Giving hasn’t fallen off the face of the Earth, but it has shifted,” she said. Benefiting from that shift: organizations that provide food and shelter.
Corporate giving declined with the collapse of the economy. Similarly, federal, state and local government support fell off as their own revenues declined, cutting into grants, subsidies and tax breaks to a variety of nonprofit organizations throughout the country.
“Nonprofits are typically the last in and the last out of a recession,” said Sandy Miniutti, vice president of Charity Navigator, a national organization that monitors the financial operations of the nation’s nonprofit groups. “Historically, this is true.”
Charitable giving throughout the United States fell 3.6 percent in 2009 to $304 billion, according to Giving USA. That was down from $315 billion in 2008. The foundation is compiling the figures for last year.
“Overall giving doesn’t change a lot year to year, even in a recession,” Miniutti said. “People realign their giving, turning to food banks and shelters.”
The Three Square food bank in Las Vegas has benefitted by the shift. Rather than receiving the corporate and foundation gifts that were common during the economic boom, Three Square CEO Julie Murray says her organization is the recipient of more but smaller gifts. In fact, Murray was troubled to hear of the financial challenges faced by the Nevada Cancer Institute.
“I feel for them,” she said. “There are wonderful nonprofits out there who are hurting.”








Visibility is another key component, for the greatest length of time the ongoing inside chuckle among Southern Nevadians was if you had the misfortune of becoming seriously ill pack your bags and prepare to travel to Huston, Arizona, or So. Cal. because there were few options here; The Lou Ruvo partnership with the Cleveland Clinic along with Nevada Cancer have done much to rectify that need but many outside of philanthropic or the gravely ill circles have no such indication of their existences, with high numbers of longterm residents over 55 plus who are at greater risk for brain injury/ alzheimers and the sun factor risk for metastic melanomas the the opposite would hold true. The award winning documentary series on the condition of medical care in Nevada "Do no harm" that shed so much light on our short comings as a whole was a powerful correction to the medical malfeasance in relation to funding supply and demand. This showcases the positive aspects of care and treatment available here and is welcome respite from sullied reputation we have suffered as a state the silver lining for the silver state.
The Greenspuns normally would be giving a whole lot more money to entities like this but they have had many investments go down the toliet.
They also have to pump lots of money into this operation, Las Vegas Sun.
I have extreme doubts that their online ads pay even 1/4 of the operational expenses of the operation.
So it is a charity operation.
So Greenspuns have to divert money to this puppy over the places like the Cancer org.
They do have their priorities.
It is their money.
They can do whatever they want to.
Since it is a left-wing rag it has very little effect on the community. The libs come here to drink their Kool-aid. The right-wingers come here to laugh at the silly articles. The middle of the roaders most likely avoid it.
It is a large waste of money.
It was more middle of the road then it would have more of an effect on the community.
I am thankful that it is a left-wing rag for the Kool-Aid crowd.
It would be good and educational if the "Las Vegas Sun" would run some articals on what a donor needs to do to donate their organs, where to go, what is needed and who to see. Knowledge is power and that might empower more people to donate if they knew what to do, how to go about donating and what is needed to be a donor. Just a thought.
Is it really that surprising considering one of the founders and board members has done such a stellar job with MGM?
How can this be with the number of people we have in this valley and the shortage of advanced medical centers? Financial mismanagement - period. This article neglects to mention how much money was spent on artwork to decorate this place. Atmosphere is important in a medical treatment center but millions of dollars worth of art is a little stupid when it means laying off personnel.
Here's an article from the Las Vegas Business Press from 2006 titled "Corporations Fork Over Big Bucks for Art":
http://www.lvbusinesspress.com/articles/...
So why don't the Murrens auction off the art collection and try and save some jobs?