Las Vegas Sun

June 4, 2012

Currently: 98° | Complete forecast | Log in

Sharron Angle camp bans TV stations from election party

Published Friday, Oct. 29, 2010 | 1:44 p.m.

Updated Friday, Oct. 29, 2010 | 4:25 p.m.

Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle sidestepped questions Friday from TV reporters who tracked her to the airport, the latest evidence of a strategy to mostly stay away from the media in her dead-heat race with Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Reporters from the CBS and NBC affiliates surprised the tea party favorite at McCarran International Airport, where they asked her questions about national security and unemployment.

Angle responded, "I will answer those questions when I am the senator."

Pressed further, she added, "The two wars that we are in right now are exactly what we are in."

Upset at the interview tactics, Angle's campaign later told the two news stations they are no longer invited to the candidate's election night party next week.

KSNV-TV News Director Bob Stoldal says Angle spokeswoman Ciara Matthews told his staff they had treated Angle as if she were Paris Hilton.

The brief encounter came on a day when a new poll found the candidates neck-and-neck in a contest that will be crucial in the fight for control of the Senate.

Arizona Sen. John McCain, Republican 2008 presidential nominee, was expected to headline a Las Vegas rally for Angle, while Reid planned to fire up supporters with Filipino boxing champion and politician Manny Pacquiao at his side.

Angle has long fashioned herself as an outsider in the GOP, but McCain's appearance will signal she has prominent support in the Washington GOP establishment.

Since a debate two weeks ago, Angle has made only a handful of public appearances and her interaction with the media has become virtually nonexistent. Her campaign says she spends much of her time going door to door in rural Nevada or attending private fundraisers.

Discussion: 33 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. The GOP is not going to be happy with Ms. Angle over this one. How many more millions are they going to have to spend to overcome her mouth.

    I can understand why they don't want her speaking to the press, it costs to much when she opens her mouth.

  2. it,s my party ...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsYJyVEUaC4

  3. Does this surprise anybody. She is running scared and does not realize just how crazy she continues to look.

  4. richard...
    HA!

    "Crazy" Angle is re- writing the book on how to Win Friends & Influence People, one dumb gaffe at a time.... She'll be a real HIT in D.C.!!!
    We'll have the "Nevada Running Senators"... her & John-John, skedaddling away from the media... hollering out "No Comment!" & "It'll all come out in the investigations!"
    yep, we'll be famous for our "Running Senators"; NEATO!

    Some of the people, and groups of people, that Sharrron has offended during her "Campaign Of Terror" are so naive they haven't even figured out yet they've been insulted.
    Don't worry; it'll become VERY CLEAR if you elect her on Tuesday.
    6 years of Hell for Nevada.
    NO representation in Washington.
    Ensign; MOOT.
    Angle; toothless & hopelessly clueless.
    It's called Reaping what you sow, voters.

    Please, God. Rescind your call to Crazy Sharrron to be our next U.S. Senator from Nevada. Maybe there could be an emergency RECALL on her spaceship; faulty wiring or somesuch... we KNOW she's got faulty wiring, for crying out loud, it's not a stretch or anything...

  5. How dare they ask the candidate questions that were not pre-approved by her campaign!

  6. Angle, who is dumber than a bag of hammers, has the perfect audience to talk to here in NV. Facts don't matter to her supporters, which is awfully handy since she got no facts to work with.

    funny --- the bank bailout happened when? how much did we lose on it? don't be shy -- step up with those ignorant answers, folks.

    taxes ---- there's no one here who has had their taxes raised since 2008. don't matter -- the mouth breathers think differently --- and lie and lie and lie and lie until they think they've lived through a horrific tax increase. I'm talking about what's actually happened --- not what might happen, according to Bleck and the drug addict, Limbaugh.

    Socialism? Point to something --- anything --- ANYTHING that's changed that makes us now socialists.

    but the valley is full of idiots --- racist, I got mine, idiots.

    ugh --- and they don't want to hear from their first darling of ignorance? how very friggin' convenient.

  7. This is an excellent example as to the character of that woman running from the press. I feel we should make this test of access for the press not necessary.
    No Victory party , No Victory and NO absolutely NO to S, Angle.

  8. "Socialism? Point to something --- anything --- ANYTHING that's changed that makes us now socialists." - vegas_tom

    The hallmark of socialism is government ownership of the means of production. What do you call a majority position in the ownership of GM by the federal government?

  9. "What do you call a majority position in the ownership of GM by the federal government?"

    That's called temporary... unlike ACTUAL socialism, when that ownership is permanent.

    More proof the radical right needs a dictionary.

  10. "Well, I have obviously made a decision to make sure the economy doesn't collapse. I've abandoned free market principles to save the free market system." - Avowed Socialist George W. Bush

    "President George W. Bush stepped in Friday to keep America's auto industry afloat, announcing a $17.4 billion bailout for GM and Chrysler, with the terms of the loans requiring that the firms radically restructure and show they can become profitable soon."

    Let's also point out that the temporary intervention with loans to GM and Chrysler was proposed by George W. Bush, the leader of the republican party, and supported by fiscal hawks like Paul Ryan.

    Boftx, are you calling Paul Ryan a socialist?

  11. A warning for all of the voters getting ready to vote for Sharron Angle or if you are getting ready to vote for any other senator other than Reid. Recall that Ensign is under investigation and may probably have to resign and he is quite a junior senator so does not carry much weight. Similarly, Sharron Angle can't even face the press or the public here in NV without saying something stupid, so I am wondering what a wonderful speaker and team maker she will be in the Senate? The bottom line is that Yucca Mountain will reopen and for those of you who live in Las Vegas, it is not far from your homes, so if an adverse event occurs, Las Vegas real estate will go to zero value and the gambling/tourist business will die out immediately. So forget about what else Sharron Angle stands for; that is against social security, health care for every one, no abortion for even rape and incest victims, no more extensions of unemployment benefits, against medicare, against veterans by making the VA private and against education as she wants to eliminate the Dept. of Education. Go ahead and vote for Sharron Angle and you will find out yourselves how sorry this state of NV will become.

  12. ksand,

    I haven't gone back to check for sure, and I might be wrong, but as I recall it was Obama who set the final terms that not only gave the government a majority stake, but also gave a substantial holding to the unions after taking away holdings from the original bond holders.

  13. "Do you recall a speaker of the House, before passing a bill, saying "we won't know what's in it until we pass it!" Where was your outrage then?"

    There was no outrage because that's not what she said.

    Her actual quote: "But WE have to pass the bill so that YOU can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.

    Maybe that's because of people who spread false quotes, misinformation, slander and lies about politicians and bills... like you.

  14. Actually, the original terms of the loan were set by the Bush administration, and the greatest majority of the funds were dispersed prior to Obama's inauguration, boftx. Bush announced the auto bailouts in December of 2008.

    Need I remind you: the auto companies begged for the intervention in the first place. Government didn't seize GM or Chrysler. Furthermore, the intervention was temporary.

    It doesn't fit any rational definition of socialism.

    Try again.

  15. ksand,

    Yes, the original terms were set by Bush ( http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/20/busine... ), but the final terms were set by Obama ( http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/3322... ) and included the government and union ownership positions.

    I'm not going to post the Politifact fact check, I'll leave it to you, and others, to look it up.

    And it's only temporary if the government sells its stock, when will that happen? And even that doesn't justify Obama's handing a substantial stake to the unions at the bond holders' expense.

    On a tangent, how do you explain Reid claiming that Ford only survived because it took part in the bailout? (Hint: Ford was the only one of the Big Three *not* to take a bailout. Do a Google on it for a YouTube video showing Reid say that on the Senate floor.)

  16. When Nathan Baca got Reid to say: "there weren't any illegals working in the Nevada construction industry"....the Angle camp didn't complain. Seems to me he tries to ask tough questions of both sides, unlike talk radio sycophants Heidi Harris and Alan Stock.

    Ciara Terns Mathews (I believe married to someone out at NPRI) worked for station KXNT. Look at the way KXNT whitewash the John Ensign "affair."

    Ciara Terns won the KXNT "radio star contest." Another winner? Heather Kydd, the former "youth coordinator for John Ensign and Secretary of the Clark County Republican Party. Do we see a "pattern" here?

    The Ensign cover up? and whitewash?

    Alan Stock has lunch with Ensign a week before the radio "interview." (aka softball game)

    Then the Station, KXNT, has an unscientific Internet poll concerning what question they want asked. Questions on the affair or questions on policy. Surprise! The listeners want questions on policy. (Guess they ended up with a number of calloused fingers out at Ensign headquarters.)
    Then Ensign dodges real media by using a decoy car at the radio station's studio.

    The BIG interview??? Alan Stock just threw a few softball questions at poor Ensign with no follow-up.

    This is the kind of press access Angle, Ciara Mathews, Alan Stock an Heidi Harris want?

    The ditto-heads manta is "don't think, let the Rush Limbaugh's of this world think for you."

    The Afghanistan War has about a 25% approval rating with the American people. It should be an issue for Senate Candidates. If Angle thinks government can't work in America, why does she think it can work in Iraq and Afghanistan?

  17. "The media has been less than friendly to Angle's campaign ..." - LarryVegas

    Larry,

    How can you even think such a thing?!? Haven't you read this story? http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/elsewhe...

    Reid himself has proclaimed it so it must be true!

  18. She's NUTS,...this kind of activity should be expected. You think Harry was bad,...elect this loon!

  19. boftx- The final terms of the GM bailout were absolutely managed by Obama. GM was taking money, but not making the major changes needed to turn the company around. Obama fired the CEO, and his administration managed their restructuring. They have now had two censecutive profitable quarters, and when they issue stock, the taxpayers will likely see all of their money back. Pretty impressive considering the govt bailed them out for several times their market capitalization.

    Bailing out the auto industry was not an investment any private sector investment group would have made, but if the govt would not have stepped in the alternative would have been the loss of approximately 1M jobs.

    Personally I think the results have been outstanding and I am glad a million people aren't suffering because of the decisions made by a few dozen executives. I am also happy we aren't paying 1M more people's unemployment.

  20. VegasEngineer,

    The biggest problem I have with the bailout was not that the government took a majority position, but how the bond holders were hung out to dry so to speak and the unions given a stake in their place when they (the unions) appear to be a factor in causing the problems in the first place.

  21. Violent commenter "Libslapper" claims "And I basically said the same thing! POTATO... POTAH-TOE! They forced fed us a law against the will of the american people."

    Wrong. Stop lying. You claimed she said she needed to pass it before SHE knew what was in it. That's a lie. It's not what she said, and in context, it makes you look like you're just passing propaganda that you're not smart enough to discern.

    As for "against the will of the american [sic] people, a recent poll showed that 2 out of 3 thought the bill DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH, as opposed to the 1 in 3 who wants it repealed. Facts are a difficult thing for you to understand, apparently.

    Her actual quote: "But WE have to pass the bill so that YOU can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.

    Maybe that's because of people who spread false quotes, misinformation, slander and lies about politicians and bills... like you.

  22. "On a tangent, how do you explain Reid claiming that Ford only survived because it took part in the bailout?"

    Oh boftx, again you're being disingenuous about what Reid said. First you did so with Reid's comments about undocumented workers. Then about Pelosi's comments about health care reform. Now with Reid's supposed comments about Ford?

    For those who aren't inclined to fact-check, let's go back to what he ACTUALLY said,

    Reid: "Well, isn't it a good thing we did? Isn't it a good thing today in America we have an automobile manufacturing sector? If it had been up to them (Republicans), General Motors would be gone. If it were up to them, Ford Motor Company would probably be gone. Chrysler would definitely be gone."

    He specifically used the word "probably." He never said they "only survived because [Ford] took part in the bailout."

    "He specifically was speaking about jobs and more broadly about the entire auto sector. Had Chrysler and General Motors folded, many industry suppliers would have followed suit, leaving Ford with substantially less than a full deck. And even though automaker did not accept federal assistance, it told the Senate Banking Committee in 2008 that it was "critically important that loans are available to us and the domestic auto industry" should the downturn prove longer and deeper than anticipated."

    Boftx, every time you seem to illicit praise for being a voice of reason, you bring up some patently-false revisionist history, a severely mangled, out-of-context quote or an outright lie. Funny, you seem to be a resourceful guy. Why can't you do a simple google search before posting this nonsense?

    Or are you doing it intentionally?

    "And it's only temporary if the government sells its stock, when will that happen?"

    GM's IPO is set to be offered in weeks. Again, another easily-Googled fact.

  23. What I thought was funny was the reporter that asked these questions explained how he found out Sharron Angle (and her husband) was going to the airport was via a Tweet someone sent that said they were sitting right next to her and that she was going to the airport. So, the news crew hustled together and hauled tail to the airport to intercept her.

    Sharron Angle runs, but she can't hide.

    Her ability to only find news sources that ask her softball questions she likes is transparent. It means she is devoid of any intelligence coupled with she has something to hide. Probably MANY things to hide. It is guaranteed we won't find out much about her at all. Because she just wants votes and money, but she don't want to work for either of them. Charismatic behavior only works for a little while. Then people ignore you. But the problem is...she contains not one iota of charismatic behavior to make her electable. Nor worth talking to. From everything I see, she's the type of person you talk to one-on-one and then you suddenly lock up, get this vacant look on your face, smile politely just to be nice, inwardly asking yourself, oh my gosh, why exactly am I talking with her, and how the hell do I get away from her?

    She don't seem to understand that the media are empowered to ask questions and inform people. The media speaks for the people and are synonymous with them. When she shuts them all out, then she is shunning people and remaining incommunicado, clearly refusing to speak to them. She don't give a damn about them other than to say stupid vague generalities focused towards getting her easy votes and money. But when pressed for further details, THAT'S when she shuts up. Because she has no idea nor a clue.

    Stupid way to run a campaign to try to get people to vote for you.

    But, after this exchange at the airport, we can totally understand why she ducks the press (quoted from above article):

    "Pressed further, she added, 'The two wars that we are in right now are exactly what we are in.'"

    Huh? I can just see right now the raised eyebrow and questioning look from Keith Olbermann from MSNBC at that incredible literary insight exuded from the lips of the esteemed Sharron Angle.

    And people want to elect her to represent Nevada in important foreign policy decisions?

    And we want her in charge of directing tip-of-the-spear military operations?

    Sending our life blood to foreign lands in harm's way?

    As a retired Navy veteran, I would safely say....No. Hell no. Keep her out. Anyways, from all indications shown, she would love to send military somewhere in some stupid war, but when they come back broken, there would be nothing for them anyways. Because she already dismantled Veterans Affairs and made money off of that.

    My vote still stays with Senator Reid. I prefer sanity over tea.

  24. One only has to look at this website to see why Angle is avoiding much of the media. The News Media in Cuba is more impartial.

  25. shes the laughing stock of the nation. chavez of venezuela and castro from cuba are giving her advice regarding public relations. what a class act!

  26. Here is just one of many links to the video where Reid lumps Ford with GM and Chrysler, as well as New York for that matter. The full context gives no indication that he wasn't including them in the bailout.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2...

  27. Sharon Angle is not a leader, she is a COWARD! Sharon, what do you have to hide? Not in your job description? Quit hiding the truth!

  28. "Here is just one of many links to the video where Reid lumps Ford with GM and Chrysler, as well as New York for that matter. The full context gives no indication that he wasn't including them in the bailout."

    Reading comprehension, boftx. That's the exact quote I wrote in my post above. So I'll copy and repost the analysis to which you could not argue:

    He specifically used the word "probably." He never said they "only survived because [Ford] took part in the bailout."

    "He specifically was speaking about jobs and more broadly about the entire auto sector. Had Chrysler and General Motors folded, many industry suppliers would have followed suit, leaving Ford with substantially less than a full deck. And even though automaker did not accept federal assistance, it told the Senate Banking Committee in 2008 that it was "critically important that loans are available to us and the domestic auto industry" should the downturn prove longer and deeper than anticipated."

    Boftx, every time you seem to ellicit praise for being a voice of reason, you bring up some patently-false revisionist history, a severely mangled, out-of-context quote or an outright lie. Funny, you seem to be a resourceful guy. Why can't you do a simple google search before posting this nonsense?

    Or are you doing it intentionally?

  29. ksand, will you please post a link to a recognized, respected site that takes your position on this? I haven't checked the thousands of sites that come back when Googling this, but the first few pages appear to all take my view on it.

    The clip speaks for itself.

    Ford survived on its own.

  30. Angle and Sandoval both are wise to avoid the government media. The main stream media are in bed with the liberals and, therefore, the enemies of conservatives. They take statements out of context, twist the words, distort phrases and meanings and even just plain lie about conservative candidates. Reid does, too. But, in the fair and balanced live debate between Reid and Angle, she mopped the floor with old "where's my papers" Reid.

  31. Some people are wondering just what Washington has done to push socialism upon The People. Huh? There isn't enough room on this page to list it all. How about listing something in our lives that the govt. is NOT in someway controlling or taxing? That would take up less than a sentence to print, but a helluva lot of time to search for. If the term "socialism" offends you, use "tyranny".

  32. Michigan paper agrees that Ford probably would not have survived without GM/Chrysler bailout and guaranteed funds for Ford because of the effect on the suppliers:

    http://www.mlive.com/auto/index.ssf/2010...

    The Michigan paper gives proper context to a sentence you took out of context and mangled to claim Reid said something he did not. In fact, that article is a direct rebuttal to those (like you) who mangled the intent of Reid's speech.

    "Ford survived on its own."

    And Reid didn't claim they accepted bailout cash in the speech you quoted.

    Let me copy and paste it again, since you don't even seem to understand your own video and quote:

    Reid: "Well, isn't it a good thing we did? Isn't it a good thing today in America we have an automobile manufacturing sector? If it had been up to them (Republicans), General Motors would be gone. If it were up to them, Ford Motor Company would probably be gone. Chrysler would definitely be gone."

    Here's Ford's CEO Alan Mullaly on Greta Van Sustern:

    "Well, it is a very interesting dilemma, because the industry is so interdependent that nearly 70 percent of the dollar value of any one of our cars is with our supply base, and our supply base produces about 70 percent of their volume go to all three of the manufactures, plus the Japanese."

    "So the concern is, of course, that if a major automobile company would go into bankruptcy, that it could take the suppliers into bankruptcy, and then ultimately take us into bankruptcy."

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,4692...

    Even Ford's CEO, the guy whose stewardship meant Ford didn't need bailout cash, recognizes the importance of keeping GM/Chrysler afloat, and agrees with Reid's assessment.

    So I've provided you with a link, plus the words of the CEO who has a far greater knowledge of the innerworking of the automobile industry.

    So you took a single sentence out of context and mangled its intent, claiming Reid said something he didn't say... and what he did say is supported by Michigan press and Ford's own CEO. Good job, boftx.

  33. One work for Ms. Angle.

    Loser!

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.