Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleWhat the Gibbons-Ozmen relationship tells us about Nevada politics
Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2010 | 2 a.m.
The long, sweet, cozy story of the Gibbons and Ozmen families, where campaign cash and government contracts have been the currency of friendship, has so many “only in Nevada” answers.
So many questions, too:
Where could a governor take $30,000 from a company and its principals in proximity to the corporation getting an $11 million state contract, then vote to ratify the contract, claiming to be “unaware” of the donation, even though it was from longtime friends and accounted for 95 percent of his contributions at the time?
Only in Nevada.
The chronology here is fascinating — and I don’t just mean how far back the Gibbons-Ozmen ties go, which is when Gov. Jim Gibbons was a congressman and helped Fatih and Eren Ozmens’ Sierra Nevada Corp. secure contracts and then saw the Ozmens hire Dawn Gibbons as a consultant. Where else could a congressman advocate for a local company, which then reciprocates by hiring the congressman’s wife, and then the couples travel to Turkey?
Only in Nevada.
The recent chain of Gibbons-Ozmen events is quite telling.
When I first checked the Sierra Nevada Web site this week, the company had a news release dated Aug. 5 announcing the contract with the Nevada Army National Guard to build solar facilities. Gibbons’ contribution report lists the $30,000 donation — bundled through the couple and a company PAC — coming Aug. 6.
By Tuesday the news release was dated Sept. 24 (I printed the original with the Aug. 5 date, by the way), which would have come after Gibbons, as chairman of the Board of Examiners, voted to approve the contract. I am not sure news release dates matter that much because either way, the governor took a huge cash sum a short time before he voted on the contract.
His spokesman, Dan Burns, said the governor “was unaware of the contribution at the time.” Here’s what makes that so suspicious, though: Gibbons did not start raising money last year until July. When he took the $30,000 from the Ozmens, he only had two previous donations — totaling $2,525. Could Gibbons really have been so disconnected from his campaign that he did not know his friends essentially had provided the only money in his account? Maybe.
To be fair, Burns pointed out that the bid award was made by a committee and that the governor did not influence the process. Fine. But where else could a governor claim with a straight face that he did not know close friends had bid on an $11 million contract and given a large sum of money to his campaign near the vote?
Only in Nevada.
Even if the Aug. 5 date was a mistake on that company release, there is another on the site with the same date, the day before the $30,000 contribution, in which Sierra Nevada announced a joint venture with a national solar firm, with promises of work to begin soon on “future solar (photovoltaic) projects.” And, voilà, eight days later, Sierra Nevada was formally notified it had the best bid for the National Guard contract — a bid ratified less than a month later by the governor and the Board of Examiners. Where does this happen?
Only in Nevada.
To many cynical observers, especially in the Year of Hating Incumbents, this may seem like pay-to-play. Few, I’d guess, will believe the contribution at that time was coincidental. Coincidences don’t happen often in politics — and that is not only in Nevada.
It also appears to be perfectly legal. State ethics laws specifically exempt campaign contributions from disclosure requirements when voting — the rationale being the elected official has submitted a contribution report so that information is public. Where could that kind of rationale be used to exculpate such nondisclosure?
Only in Nevada.
The ethics laws themselves are right on point:
“A public officer or employee shall not seek or accept any gift, service, favor, employment, engagement, emolument or economic opportunity which would tend improperly to influence a reasonable person in his position to depart from the faithful and impartial discharge of his public duties.”
And: “A public officer or employee shall not use his position in government to secure or grant unwarranted privileges, preferences, exemptions or advantages for himself, any business entity in which he has a significant pecuniary interest, or any person to whom he has a commitment in a private capacity to the interests of that person.”
Where else would taking $30,000 from government supplicants up for a bid not qualify as impeding impartiality and where else would a commitment in private capacity not include a longtime friendship, complete with apparent quid pro quos and European travel?
I think you know.
Jon Ralston’s column appears Sunday, Wednesday and Friday. Ralston can be reached at 870-7997 or at ralston@vegas.com.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- UNLV makes key plays down stretch to hold off San Diego State 65-63
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Jon said "To be fair, the bid award was made by an independent committee and that the governor cannot influence the process"
===================================
Only in Nevada.
Could the lawmakers pass the budget over a Gov veto and a few months later there is a 5, 6, 7 , 8 hundred million dollar hole
Only in Nevada.
Could the Unions call the shots on what they are paid when there is a 5, 6, 7 , 8 hundred million dollar hole
Jon
You are too liberally biased in your reporting. You know damn well that the budget of which the governor is dealing with is the budget imposed upon him by the demorats and the RINO Dennis Nolan(R), so why don't you inform the public of this?
The demorats are keeping their heads down and have not stood up to remind the voters that it was they, who veto'd the governors budget last year and forced him to use their liberal budget with all the overladen spending programs and the other feel good programs which in spite of what the governor said about the economic turn down last year, they ignored him and tried to ride the District of Criminals liberal agenda of Dirty Harry and nobama's of spend, spend, spend, and then watch the deficit soar, soar, soar!
Only in Nevada!
Also, why don't you expose the fraud in the Clark County Commissioner's officer, i.e., Susan Brager(D) who is a real estate agent who votes on all permits for housing construction/businesses where she profits fiscally for her, her employer, her peers in the Real Estate industry?
Only in Nevada!
Also, why this Susan Brager(D) received a fine imposed for an ethics violation of $25 and told the Ethics Board (all documented on the Nevada website) that she could not afford to pay the $25 fine and asked for a waiver of payment and yet gives Rory Reid $10K a few weeks ago for his soon to be defunct attempt to run for governor of Nevada?
Only In Nevada!
Also investigate why this Susan Brager(D) is performing real estate appraisals of property owned by Clark County government and referred to as the "Brager assessment" by county employees, of which the property is never submitted for bids by the community but bought up by Brager(D), other members of the commission and her friends in the real estate industry!
Only In Nevada!
Only in Nevada can we get totally biased and unfair reporting of the truth by this liberal con artist who goes by the name Jon Ralston!
Only In Nevada!
Was this $30,000 in NevaDUH currency (casino chips), an "in-kind" barrel of Viagra, or Ewe Ess Dollars?
Jon - you gotta be more specific when writing this stuff.
Thanks for the excellent reporting Jon. Where is the FBI? This former Congressman and current governor (in title only) needs to be investigated to the fullest. He is a sexual assaulter, and extortionist and a liar.
Governor Reedy, er, I mean, COS Reedy -- are you Vorenious? Sure smells like it.
Future said:
Jon said "To be fair, the bid award was made by an independent committee and that the governor cannot influence the process"
Actually, the Governor's spokesman said that. That is self serving spin. The Governor can and does influence what goes on in his agencies.
Also, and this is something that many who post here don't seem to understand, Jon is not a reporter in this forum - he's a columnist. Columnists have opinions - they are allowed to have opinions and are not being biased when they do.
This is another prime example of legal corruption. Our current political system is slowly bring our civilization down. I believe that the only solution is to ban lobbying-the catch 22 here is that the politicians are the ones who have to do it and they are not about to voluntarily take money out of their pockets. Sounds grim, but it is highly unlikely that Nevada is the only state where this is happening.
Maybe the Gov justs likes Donnie and Marie's singing? No harm there.
Maybe Gibbons will leave office in an orange jumpsuit? And to all that hate RINOs, how the f do you think your services were paid for before you retired? "Get busy living or get busy dieing." Any leader should govern from the middle and represent the majority.
WHEN YOU HAVE A POPULATION THAT IS AS POLITICALLY ILLITERATE AS NEVADA, AND CLARK COUNTY ESPECIALLY LITERALLY, EVERYONE KEEPS THEIR MOUTHS SHUT BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO OPEN THEM.
SEE NO, HEAR NO, SPEAK NO...
NO-WATER DRY-HOLE LOOK-THE-OTHER-WAY CORRUPT POLITICS ALL THE WAY.