SUN EDITORIAL:
‘Demographic tsunami’
In the coming decade, state’s seniors will find limited resources, services
Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2010 | 2:06 a.m.
Recent U.S. Census Bureau figures revealed that Nevada, which for years had touted itself as being one of the top states in terms of population growth, actually lost population in the most recent year.
That fact obviously generated a lot of attention, but there was another statistic that shouldn’t be lost on Nevada’s policymakers, a statistic that could have costly implications: The Census Bureau, as the Las Vegas Sun’s Steve Kanigher and Alex Richards reported Sunday, is projecting that the fastest-growing part of the state’s population during the next 10 years will be senior citizens. Kanigher and Richards note that policymakers not only fear that this aging population will place a burden on Nevada’s already strained health care system and social services, but that it also will create more urgency to build affordable housing.
What makes this an even more alarming situation is that Nevada, as of today, provides bare-bones services for its senior citizens. For that matter, whether it’s education or social services of just about any type, the amount this state spends is paltry.
So imagine what it will be like when even more seniors move here and there isn’t enough assistance to go around. Indeed, most of the talk about Nevada’s budget today isn’t about what services to add — most talk centers on what services will be cut to balance the state’s budget as revenue keeps dropping precipitously. It also won’t help matters that, with declining revenue, the spending pie keeps shrinking, which means the battles will become even more pitched in Carson City among the competing interests.
So don’t be surprised if you see the needs of children pitted against those of senior citizens — more textbooks vs. property tax rebate programs for seniors, for example — when the Legislature decides state spending.
Nevadans shouldn’t take comfort in the fact that the percentage increase in the number of senior citizens is based on prerecession data because the reality is that our state will have more seniors a decade from now. State demographer Jeff Hardcastle says this is likely to be the case for a couple of reasons: The middle-aged workers who flooded the state in the 1990s will likely stay and retire here, and younger people will leave Nevada to find work, unless the state’s recession eases.
Nevadans shouldn’t be surprised that senior citizens will be coming here in greater numbers in the future; they have been flocking to this state for some time. As UNR’s Sanford Center for Aging reported in 2007: “Nevada’s infrastructure of services for older adults is unprepared for the demographic tsunami which will occur as the Baby Boomer population ages.” Ironically, Nevada’s low-tax burden, which means fewer state services, has been a draw for senior citizens.
The days of putting off decisions to adequately provide for services for our senior population can’t continue — unless, of course, state leaders want to embarrassingly fall even further behind what dismal services Nevada currently offers.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Comrads ! What about restoring the tax cuts engineered by AOWLBush for the wealthy and use that to 'stimulus' the seniors of Nevada? Didn't that amount to about $1.4 trillion? Dodger(5 drafts dodged)Cheney and AWOLBush are rich so make 'em pay higher Federal Income Taxes. Add to that their henchmen of blood and war and torture and the entire Republican(CountryClubParty)Party and Nevada can get Federal assistance way beyond anything expected. How long do seniors have to carry these idiots both on their backs and wallets. Step up to the retail counter and you won't be getting waited on. Wait. Comrads! Merci !!
RachealRay, Gov.Palin,AWOLBush and Draft5Cheney can all pay one heck of a lot of Federal Taxes. Add LimppieLimbaugh who makes $33 million per year and away goes Nevada's senior's issues forever. We can smoke and sip vodka in peace for a change, and perhaps even spend a few pecos at the blackjack tables!!
The answer then is more privatization or competitive sourcing, not more government. Government routinely fails to demonstrate that it can control costs.
I think fosimmons has the answer to the coming tsunami, he just forgot the question. And why did he not close with his usual "Thank you?. Ungrateful old goat...
WTF is a pecos?
Maybe fosimmons is going to Texas and get some river water from the Pecos to mix with his vodka. Maybe that's why he been sounding a little muddy lately.
The nerve of fosimmons not telling us "Thank You" for reading his poetry this morning...
Privitazation costs even more. CEOs on jets making 50 million a year have to be paid for. we can no longer afford that lifestyle.
The question is how much are young families costing us? $8000 a year per kid just for school and then lunch programs and housing. The list goes on and on.