Las Vegas Sun

September 30, 2014

Currently: 82° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

LETTER FROM WASHINGTON:

Tax-cut bill splits staunch conservatives with eye on 2012

Ensign bucks majority with no vote; Heller says ‘good outweighs bad’

John Ensign

John Ensign

Dean Heller

Dean Heller

A week of fiscal scrabbling resulted in a lot of temporary tax-cut extensions, and one scrapped spending bill.

In the process, two presumed contenders for Nevada’s 2012 Senate race took to opposite philosophical corners; an interesting early split for two Republican lawmakers with commonly conservative roots.

Sen. John Ensign was one of a few conservative Republicans who broke from the pack to vote against a tax-cut bill hashed out between President Barack Obama and the GOP, saying that although the bill included important tax-cut extensions he supported, he couldn’t vote for a bill that added to the deficit without attempting to make cuts elsewhere.

“It’s good for the economy in the short term, but the debt is going to kill us in the not-too-long term,” Ensign said.

Across the Capitol, Rep. Dean Heller took the opposite stance.

Heller said he voted “to prioritize extending the tax cuts over my concerns about spending ... the good outweighs the bad in this particular piece of legislation,” he said. “Eighty-eight percent of this bill is tax cuts, or at least not tax increases. To me, 88 percent of this bill, I like.”

With supporters — including GOP leadership — painting the vote as do-or-die to avoid being hurled into the teeth of a second recession, Ensign’s stance was bold, and one taken by only a few other conservative senators, including anti-spending hawks Sens. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Jeff Sessions of Alabama.

That Ensign should be in their company isn’t all that unusual. He’s routinely ranked among the most conservative members of the Senate, receiving a score 94.37 out of a possible 100 from the American Conservative Union for his policy positions. That’s a few points higher than Heller’s lifetime rating of 89.33 percent.

Ensign has had ample time and reason to align his philosophies with some of those senators. Coburn and DeMint were fellow residents at the now-famous but defunct C Street house, and are the well-juiced keepers of the ignition keys to the Tea Party engine.

But Ensign breaks from the Coburns and DeMints of the Senate in one important area: earmarks. And that was enough to make him a focal point of indirect accusations of hypocrisy last week.

“You can all look it up in the dictionary yourself, but I bet that if you went to ‘H’ in the dictionary and found ‘hypocrite’, under that would be people who ask for earmarks but vote against them,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said of Ensign and others who took such a position. “You can’t have it both ways.”

Despite advocating for a return to 2008 spending levels and threatening to vote against the now-dead federal omnibus budget bill, Ensign requested about $85 million in earmark spending for Nevada.

Here’s where Ensign parted ways with his potential 2012 challenger: Heller also said he wouldn’t vote for the omnibus bill — but didn’t ask for a dime in earmarks.

It will be months before Ensign or Heller will have to answer for these votes in a campaign setting — and only if both decide to run.

But with tax-and-spending issues all but guaranteed to come up on the campaign trail and before Congress during the run-up to the next election, it’s a salvo that’s likely to be recalled down the line.

Despite the discrepancy between their policy positions, Nevada’s Republican watchers said Ensign and Heller voted their conservative consciences. But with an ear toward future campaigns, they agreed that one’s vote seemed better poised to translate to the airwaves than the other’s.

“I think politically, Heller comes out better, because Ensign needs to explain his vote,” conservative blogger Chuck Muth said. “ ‘I voted not for continuing the tax cuts, but here’s why’ — the average voter, they aren’t really interested in that much detail, and on the surface, he voted against extending the tax cuts.”

These Republicans downplayed the significance of the Democrats’ accusations of hypocrisy on earmarks that seemed to stick to Ensign, but bypass Heller.

“In an overall statewide poll, I don’t think people would view pork spending as high as they would other issues,” said Robert Uithoven, a Republican political adviser. “We are a donor state — we give Washington far more money than we get in return. So as long as Nevada continues to be a donor state, I don’t think the pork issue is that big.”

Nevada Republican strategist Ryan Erwin said: “You certainly can make a principled statement that you don’t want earmarks ... but then you open yourself up to criticism that you didn’t go after $100 million in available spending for the state. It’s a can’t-win issue.”

Democratic Rep. Shelley Berkley is also considering a Senate bid, and she played an uncharacteristically central and vocal role in the tax-cut debate, challenging her own splintering caucus to vote not only for the full complement of tax cuts in the bill, but also the estate tax provision she helped draft. Her proposal made the bulk of the Democratic caucus balk at the package, but helped bring many Republicans on board.

Should Berkley run against Ensign, the accusations of hypocrisy are almost guaranteed to resurface.

Republican analysts say they doubt the threat of Democrats at the door are influencing the likely Republican contenders’ voting patterns just yet.

“I don’t think Dean Heller’s voting record is motivated by what John Ensign does, but I do believe it’s in the back of his mind,” Uithoven said.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Big deficit, two no win Bush Wars (now Obama) No taxes should have been cut across the board.

    Instead, bring back the cash for clunkers and the home buyer's credit. Also, No payroll taxes for new hires or company's that hire long term unemployed. Pay for extended unemployment with a tax on hoarded capital.

  2. I say leave the States alone. It is our money. We send it to you as some kind of tax then you say I have 100 or 300 Million dollars for you, but you must spend it this way! or you will be cut off ...........(It was our Money Nevada in the First place) We need to tell them to go to h-ll (Holiday season) and we will keep our money and fix our on roads, and balance our own budget, and far most keep all and still get rid of Democratic Shelley Berkley, the biggest screw-up ever Next To Reid WHAT HAPPEN there ? well thats for years to come... Keep our heads high do not Enter fight Brothers and Sisters Peace and Love.

    Merry Christmas
    and
    Happy New Year
    and Happy Hanukkah

  3. Why does a casino require a G2? Instead a winner could pay a 5% fee to the state of Nevada for the casino to not report a win to the Feds.

  4. "THE GOOD OUTWEIGHS THE BAD IN THIS BILL"?????
    I wonder if Congress will ever get an ALL GOOD bill? Why can't they choose the positive over the negative EVERY TIME??

  5. The SUN is using an old picture of Ensign, a newer picture of Ensign will make him look older.

  6. To emvance: You are right. The power should be with the States and they should be individually in control of their business. This is the way the Constitution is written. The federal government has very limited and specific powers and the rest is left to the States and The People. I wish everyone would read the SPECIFIC POWERS the central govt. is LIMITED TO!! I wish they would teach the Constitution in schools. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IS OPERATING WAY OUTSIDE THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY!

  7. Richard says; "THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT IS OPERATING WAY OUTSIDE THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY!"

    If you could PROVE what you say then something could be done about it but the problem is it is nothing more then your opinion.

    I don't agree with what they do but one of the biggest problem is people stating opinions as facts and others believing them.