Las Vegas Sun

January 31, 2015

Currently: 50° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

jon ralston:

Did the 2012 U.S. Senate race begin last week?

John Ensign supports higher taxes on all Americans and Dean Heller is against them. But John Ensign is against burgeoning deficits and Dean Heller doesn’t seem to care.

What’s a Tea Partyer to do?

That’s the seminal question as the 2012 U.S. Senate race began last week — or at least it seemed to — as Sen. Ensign and Rep. Heller were on opposite sides of the tax cut compromise vote that overwhelmingly passed both houses of Congress and was signed by President Barack Obama.

Ensign voted against the package after repeatedly saying how horrendous it would be to raise taxes during a recession but saying the near-trillion dollars in spending was too much to bear. And Heller voted for it, ignoring the deficit implications in a statement defending his vote and focusing on the “disastrous” tax increases if the tax-cut compromise hadn’t passed.

So does the Tea Party hate deficits or tax increases more? Or are both supplanted by hatred for a president it doesn’t think should be given a victory?

The group supposedly is all about excessive federal spending, so maybe Ensign wins this round. But a year from now, when and if Heller starts his ad campaign, besides mentioning Ensign’s vote for TARP in 2008, might he mention this overwhelming tax increase the senator supported?

The bad boy senator seems to be flailing about as part of the John Ensign Resurrection Project, desperately trying to transmogrify himself from crucified sinner to true believer once more. And the ambitious congressman seems to be embarking on a Dean Heller Just Might Run Campaign, trying to maintain his viability until he makes a decision while drawing a contrast whenever he can with Ensign.

Or maybe they both voted their consciences and it has nothing to do with 2012.

We in the Fourth Estate love to pore over every vote and statement for political signals, especially in the 24/7 world of instapunditry. But the fact is the Ensign-Heller conundrum is one the GOP will have to solve sooner rather than later, with the former a much weaker general election candidate than the latter and an almost-certain loser to a strong Democratic candidate.

So the 2012 question — and not just in Nevada — morphs into: What do you do with a damaged incumbent who has voted right and now panders, no matter how erratically, to the Tea Party while another credible conservative (albeit one who scampered right after being singed in a near-loss four years ago) stands ready to be the party’s nominee?

Ensign is appealing to that important GOP primary niche: The voter who doesn’t care if Ensign had an affair with his wife’s best friend who was also his best friend’s wife or that he had his parents pay off the couple or that he then creepily tried to find the cuckolded husband a job or that he is a world-class hypocrite for being a public morality enforcer while being a private adulterer or that he voted to raise taxes on every American (after saying how awful it would be to do so in a recession) or that he sponsored tens of millions in earmarks (after complaining about profligate federal spending).

This is your candidate, Tea Party?

If you take away his personal failings, rank hypocrisy and ethical transgressions, Ensign is a GOP exemplar. He also has aligned himself with the Jim DeMint-Tom Coburn wing of the Republican caucus, the deficit hawks who have made slashing spending the holy grail. (You also may recall that Coburn, a doctor, is Ensign’s gynecologist, having claimed doctor-patient privilege at the onset of the Ensign scandal and who Ensign’s former best friend says tried to negotiate a deal to buy the humiliated family’s silence, which Coburn denies. They are all honorable men.)

Heller is in an enviable position as he can wait for a few months to see how many factors play out: Whether Ensign’s near-fatal negative rating turns fatal. Whether Ensign raises any money. Whether the National Republican Senatorial Committee quietly signals it will support Heller. Whether Sharron Angle decides to get into the Senate race — a three-way race may be Ensign’s only salvation.

The senator’s biggest worry — if reality ever intrudes in Ensignville — should be that Republicans are good at terminating wounded incumbents. (See Gibbons, Jim, 2010.)

I don’t underestimate the Democrats’ ability to muck this up, either — Rep. Shelley Berkley will be well funded if she runs but may have serious problems outside Southern Nevada. And if the congresswoman doesn’t take the leap, the Democrats may have a crowded field that could inure to the GOP’s benefit.

Whatever happens, judging from the events of last week, forgetting this year’s apparently unforgettable U.S. Senate race may be easier than I thought, thanks to Ensign and Heller.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 9 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Dean Heller and Ensign should address voter fraud, else Nevada again elect a Harry Reid

  2. Pssst---hey, Jon, the campaigning never ends. You know that.
    As soon as one election ends the next campaign begins and politicians these days spend most of their time campaigning and securing kickbacks for their supporters (at taxpayers' expense)---which is why Congress should only be in session for 3 months out of the year, and politicians' wages should be cut accordingly.

  3. All that's missing is Sharrrrrrrrrrrrrrrron, and the Nevada GOP will (yet again) be a 3 ring circus! And yes, I won't be surprised if she runs... And wins the primary (yet again). Teabaggers just don't know how to admit they're wrong.

    Perhaps that's what Shelley Berkley is betting on?

  4. atdleft
    OH Happy Days..Reid is going to spend the next six years promoting illegal immigrants rights/entitlements and sneaking internet gambling for licensed operators into law..
    Internet gambling for the Owners of Las Vegas Casino's would create so many more jobs in India..Doesn't your poor little bleeding heart just weep with joy to think of all those poor people having a job..and think Green..When the lights go out in Las Vegas...the only income is going to be federal entitlements and saved energy We will have so much more to give away to poor people...we can import a few million more illegals to come vote democrat

  5. It's past time for TARP to be given considerable credit for preventing a melt down of the global financial system. The program was rushed together at the height of the crisis, and while not perfect, it accomplished its purpose with fewer problems than bills Congress spends years on. The half of Tarp executed under Bush is on track to be profitable as most banks have repaid the loans with interest and warrants. The second half that was geared more to social outcomes such as manipulating the auto bankruptcies to the
    benefit of the unions, preventing foreclosures,
    cash for clunkers, homeowner credits, etc.
    while more popular with the public, will not be
    recouped. The continued assistance given the banks by the Fed through 0% interest rates is more deserving of criticism than the original
    TARP. It is those who voted against TARP that
    should be kept out of office.

  6. well, Thanks to Reid NV is back on Track and thanks to the NV voters we beat back the Sharron Angle/Tea Party whackos with the help of a few republicans no less!

  7. ENSIGN just killed his chance of re election yesterday when he voted against the dream act . The same Hispanic vote that saved Harry Reid could have been his but he voted the way he did and in 2012 he will pay the price ..

  8. Voter fraud, that's the crap from Heidi Harris, Jeromy Wayne and the other talk radio losers....If "they" were going to fix elections, why wouldn't they fix the Titus v. Heck race???

  9. Xtra, since you have PROOF of voter fraud, why don't you file an official complaint.

    Oh wait, someone did and the election officials didn't find any indication of election fraud. The state of Nevada verified the election results and Ms. Angle lost. Badly.

    So I guess your next step is to slander Senator Reid with the attacks that have already been proven to be lies. Just keep listening to the AM radio, close out the rest of the world and everything will be Ok.

    In you own mind, that is.