Justice John Paul Stevens retiring, Obama to fill vacancy
AP Photo/Charles Dharapak
In this Sept. 29, 2009, file photo Associate Justice John Paul Stevens sits for a new group photograph at the Supreme Court in Washington. Stevens, leader of Supreme Court’s liberals, to retire this summer.
Friday, April 9, 2010 | 8:02 a.m.
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, the court's oldest member and leader of its liberal bloc, is retiring. President Barack Obama now has his second high court opening to fill.
Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed "well in advance of the commencement of the court's next term."
The timing of Stevens' announcement leaves ample time for the White House to settle on a successor and for Senate Democrats, who control a 59-vote majority, to conduct confirmation hearings and a vote before the court's next term begins in October. Republicans have not ruled out an attempt to delay confirmation.
His announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.
Stevens began signaling a possible retirement last summer when he hired just one of his usual complement of four law clerks for the next court term. He acknowledged in several interviews that he was contemplating stepping down and would certainly do so during Obama's presidency.
Chief Justice John Roberts said in a written statement that Stevens has earned the gratitude and admiration of the American people.
"He has enriched the lives of everyone at the Court through his intellect, independence, and warm grace," Roberts said.
Stevens informed Obama in a one-paragraph letter addressed to "My dear Mr. President," officially received by the White House at 10:30 a.m. EDT, two minutes before the public announcement. The news came on a day when the court wasn't in session.
Just before the court's announcement, Obama, en route back to Washington from a trip to Prague, had called a Friday afternoon Rose Garden statement, saying the subject would be a West Virginia mine accident.
The leading candidates to replace Stevens are Solicitor General Elena Kagan, 49, and federal appellate Judges Merrick Garland, 57, and Diane Wood, 59.
Stevens' departure will not change the court's conservative-liberal split because Obama is certain to name a liberal-leaning replacement. But the new justice is not likely to be able to match Stevens' ability to marshal narrow majorities in big cases.
Stevens was able to draw the support of the court's swing votes, now-retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Justice Anthony Kennedy, to rein in or block some Bush administration policies, including the detention of suspected terrorists following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming.
But after the arrival of Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, President George W. Bush's appointees, Stevens more often was among the four liberal justices in dissent.
Stevens' recent dissent in a major case involving campaign finance laws showed both the eloquence of his writing and, in his stumbling reading of his opinion in the courtroom, signs that his age might at long last be affecting him, though he remains an active tennis player and swimmer.
Throughout his tenure, which began after President Gerald Ford nominated him in 1975, Stevens usually sided with the court's liberal bloc in the most contentious cases _ those involving abortion, criminal law, civil rights and church-state relations. He led the dissenters as well in the case of Bush v. Gore that sealed Bush's election in 2000.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed







Another chance for the radical right to scream HELL NO to anybody Obama picks. Fox News will lead the charge in slandering whoever is nominated.
This will be a bigger fight then anything in Vegas.
Regardless of how much you all complain, he will nominate a liberal leaning justice, he/she will be confirmed, and there will still be cases that will likely be split down the middle because of the two sides philosophical beliefs.
So get over it. HAH!
I really hope the opposition party stays above using racist and sexist attacks against whomever Obama chooses to nominate.
Their racist and sexist attacks on Justice Sotomayor were disgusting.
edge, you mean like the ones used by the Dems to anybody Bush nominated.......just asking?
@ dhvincent1 How was the nomination and confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor a "screw up?" Her record was impeccable. And don't reply with FOX's false accusations of racism and legal radicalism. Actually, never mind, that's all a conservative can hang their hat on.
I hope whomever is nominated helps reverse the "corporate shill" status of the Court
Thanks to Justice Stevens for his wonderful service!
Filibuster time. Keep the seat open for President Romney to fill.
I think Rory Reid would be a good choice.
Ensign may be available.
IT'S BUSHES FAULT!
What this will do is start the debate about whether health care reform is unconstitutional or not early. Obama will pick his lib for the seat and whoever it is will be grilled on how they interpret the Constitution.
@axiom: Sotomayor is a screw up and very radical and does not have an impeccable record. Maybe if you watched Fox news you'd learn more. Funny how you libs say Fox news is bad when they even have dems and Libs on and they don't agree with the administration.
@getalife: You're correct about how Libs and Dems don't like being questioned about there decisions but it was ok when Bush was in office.
Nominate Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin, what a hoot that would be.