Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleSUN EDITORIAL:
A victory for Yellowstone
Federal court ruling returns grizzly bear to threatened species status
Saturday, Sept. 26, 2009 | 2:04 a.m.
Anyone who has driven through Yellowstone National Park in recent years is certain to have spotted large clusters of dying whitebark pines. The high-elevation trees, when healthy, produce fatty seeds that are an important food source for the estimated 600 grizzly bears that live in or near the park.
But global warming and other maladies have taken a toll on these trees, exposing them to massive beetle infestation that is robbing bears of access to the seeds.
Federal Judge Donald Molloy in Montana ruled Monday that the tree devastation and the adverse effect it is having on the bears are why it was a mistake for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Bush administration in 2007 to remove the Yellowstone grizzly from the threatened species list.
The wildlife service was convinced that the bear population had grown sufficiently to merit being delisted. But Molloy said the agency ignored scientific research, including the conclusion of its own scientists, that tied grizzly survival to that of the pines.
As evidence that the delisting was premature, 48 bear deaths were recorded in the Yellowstone area last year by the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study team. Environmental groups led by the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, which sued the government to return the bears to threatened status, stated those deaths represented the most in a single year since the 1970s. Many of those deaths occurred when bears, in search of food, wandered into areas where they became easier targets for hunters.
Molloy’s ruling is a reminder of the environmental policies that went awry under the Bush administration.
The alarming number of grizzly bear deaths last year should prompt the Obama administration to do whatever is possible to attack the beetle infestation and preserve the health of the remaining whitebark pines.
It is a shame that Yellowstone’s ecosystem has suffered such extensive damage. That is why every effort should be made to preserve the park’s wildlife inhabitants and the natural splendor that made Yellowstone the first national park.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
- Investigators seek answers to Houston’s death
- Photos: The late, great Whitney Houston is the soundtrack of my life
- Pre-Grammy gala celebrates Whitney Houston’s life
- Grammy Awards struggle with honoring Whitney Houston
- Photos: Lauren Conrad celebrates her 26th birthday at Hyde Bellagio
- Israel’s president sends message of peace to Iran
- Man charged in plot to kill Utah governor
- List of Grammy winners in select major categories
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
"Anyone who has driven through Yellowstone National Park"
Apparently the LV Sun is unaware of the evil involved in driving through Yellowstone.
Gobal warming is caused by people like the Sun staff driving through the park - shame on the Sun.
The court's decision was a bit more complicated than your story implies. No one disputes that the grizzly bear population in Yellowstone met the criteria for delisting under the recovery plan, and the US Fish & Wildlife Service relied on those numbers -- things like number of breeding females, percentage of habitat occupied by bears, and so forth. The agency did not consider the die back of whitebark pine, because that was not one of its criteria for measuring recovery. In other words, the government relied on its numbers and did not pay attention to the habitat. This led to what I have called the Numbers versus Habitat Debate, and the Fish & Wildlife Service obviously lost this debate in federal court.
David Knibb, author, Grizzly Wars: The Public Fight Over the Great Bear.
I noticed this by a writer using the name of "eo" on the wattsupwiththat web site, I hope he won't mind it I quote him regarding the polar bears:
Yellowstone has the classic history of the collapse of wildlife population from over protection. Remember the hunting of wolves and over protection of the deer population. Ultimately the deer population collapsed not from the wolves and hunting but from starvation. If the present trend continues there is a big possibility the polar bear population will collapse from mass starvation caused by over population. Blame the death on global warming.