Q+A: LAURA HENKEL:

Unashamed to explore eros

Museum gives people ‘permission to be themselves’

Leila Navidi

Laura Henkel, curator of the Erotic Heritage Museum, says when the museum opened a year ago people weren’t sure what to make of it.

By Kristen Peterson (contact)

Thursday, Sept. 24, 2009 | 2 a.m.

Erotic Heritage Philosophy

Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player

When the Erotic Heritage Museum first opened, curator Laura Henkel gave an on-camera tour and talked about her philosophy regarding erotic art.

Archive of Sun art stories

Erotic Heritage Museum

The Erotic Heritage Museum opened on Industrial Road in Las Vegas a year ago. Created by its curator Laura Henkel as her dissertation, the nonprofit museum is owned by the Exodus Trust, the parent organization for the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco, where Henkel received doctorates in human sexuality and in erotology.

Why preserve erotic heritage?

From a theological and anthropological perspective we must value the spirit of truth and historical process. Sexologists and researchers can study what people do, but fear keeps many people from expressing how they feel about what they do, and so we must count on the arts for valid expressions concerning the pleasures and meanings of sex in people’s lives.

Describe the community’s response.

At first people were unsure of what we were and why we were here, and the museum needed to show its value. Once people understand what it is about, they want to participate and help with the mission. They realize what a tremendous resource we are for the community — academically and in terms of freedom of expression and providing support for the community. We give people permission to be themselves in a nonjudgmental environment.

There was talk about partnering with UNLV for academic credit and study. Has that happened?

The state of Nevada’s accrediting agency refused to visit the museum or meet with us because the graduate program in California is not accredited by a regional accrediting body and because the graduate school refuses to take federal money or any other money that restricts our academic freedom through the Helms Amendment. On the other hand, the people from UNLV have been very helpful and supportive.

What are the sources of new acquisitions?

Private donors and from the archives of the Exodus Trust. We have been offered a collection from the Chinese government to display. I have received offers from international museums looking to present their restricted archives.

There is not enough money coming into the museum to pay for all of the materials that should be there. Funds to pay for insurance, transportation and staffing must be available before we can become a first-class international museum. Our next phase is to generate financial support through memberships and fundraisers. Our anniversary exhibition, “Sex on the Streets,” sells works by international and local contemporary artists. The proceeds are split between the nonprofit organization and the artists.

Will you ever include literature — Anais Nin or D.H. Lawrence, for example?

The trust’s literary reference system and libraries consist of 3 million items. This is the best and the most comprehensive erotological library in the world. We are trying to make it available through the museum to students and scholars. The trust spends $100,000 a year simply for storage at 25 locations. It takes at least 10 archivists and graduate students just to keep track of what is available and what needs to be saved. As soon as possible, two libraries will be moved to the museum.

What about political influence on sexuality?

It has been a 40-year battle just to gather the material and protect it. Now we are involved in finding a way to make it usable to help people see that sex education through the arts provides sexual freedom and a spiritual movement. Every fascist government knows that if you can control people’s sex lives, you can control them absolutely.

Discussion: 5 comments so far…

By GrandmaCrabby

9/24/09 at 6:55 a.m.

Suggest removal

The principles stated Ms. Henkel are all important, although she went off the rails at the end with the "fascist governments" comment.

It's important to understand that no freedom of expression is absolute, and that any government, any society, has the right to set limits on conduct and expression, for a variety of reasons. Child pornography is an expression of sexuality, but it is not protected under "freedom of expression".

That's not to compare the contents of this museum, but just to make a point. It's not a frivolous statement, though, because it has happened. The one case I know in which an American museum was prosecuted for obscenity was the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati. They presented the photography of Robert Mapplethorpe, including his controversial "X" portfolio.

That portfolio included two photographs of young children with their genitals exposed. One photograph, for example, showed a young gitl sitting on some steps with her dress hiked up and her genitals exposed.

The museum curator, Dennis Barrie, was charged and tried for obscenity. He was acquitted.

Getting back to this museum, yes it is an important topic, and a field in in which expression and understanding may be challenging and difficult. There may be great value there, and I would hope everyone keeps an open mind until they have seen the work for themselves. But at the same time, a free society has every right to have standards.

In my own personal experience, covering two decades of involvement with experimental arts organizations, I find that the biggest problem with work centered around issues of sexuality is that it tends to be insufferably uncreative and boring. It's as though the artist thought that just making a statement about sexuality is enough. I trust that Ms. Henkel has culled out such tripe.
By mw

9/24/09 at 8:51 a.m.

Suggest removal

Excellent points GrandmaCrabby in your last paragraph especially. Thank you Kristen for highlighting Laura Henkel, she is an intelligent and delightful diplomat and I trust her implicitly.
By tennis_ace_2000

9/24/09 at 9:03 a.m.

Suggest removal

Laura Henkel is hot!
By davidwayneosedach

9/24/09 at 11:01 a.m.

Suggest removal

Sounds like something we will go in see the next time we are in Las Vegas.
By JulesK27

9/24/09 at 3:06 p.m.

Suggest removal

Kudos to Laura Henkel for trying to do something brave and different here. I wish her lots of luck, because in this country anything approaching or discussing the subject of sexuality in an honest manner is frowned upon. We are such hypocrites in the U.S. I was born and raised in the L.A. area, and they used to have a Erotic Museum on Hollywood Blvd., but I think it succumbed more to bad location and lack of funds rather than to public outcry or disapproval. I am thinking about becoming a volunteer for the Vegas museum and lending my support.