Unfair labor practices charge dropped against hospital
Vote on union representation appears to be on hold
Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2009 | 2:05 a.m.
Boulder City Hospital
A second charge of unfair labor practices against Boulder City Hospital has been dropped, but a union vote among its 300 nurses, housekeepers and other workers appears to be on hold while previous charges are appealed to the National Labor Relations Board in Washington.
The second charge was filed by the Teamsters Union Local 14, which has been trying to organize the nonprofit hospital, after an administrative law judge found in the union’s favor on several previous charges.
The union alleged in the second charge that hospital managers retaliated against nurse Dale Slover for his testimony during a May hearing.
The judge in that case wrote that the hospital had wrongly interrogated Slover about union activity and that supervisors incorrectly told him that the hospital would close if it were unionized. The judge also wrote that he found Slover’s testimony credible over that of hospital managers.
National Labor Relations Board Deputy Regional Attorney Steven Wamser confirmed that the subsequent charges were dropped by the union.
Repeated calls to the Teamsters Local 14 organizers to explain why were not returned.
Wamser said a union election at the hospital was still being blocked by the appeal of the earlier charges to the National Labor Relations Board. The five-member board currently has only two members, he said, adding he did not know when the other three would be confirmed.
The hospital appealed the judge’s finding that it unfairly denied work to Greg Ostrowski, a nurse who was helping to organize the union, and that Slover’s testimony was credible, attorney Jim Winkler said.
Wamser appealed the finding that the hospital violated the National Labor Relations Act when it posted the company’s harassment policy after employees complained about the union activity, Winkler said.
If the board in Washington finds the hospital was wrong, a compliance plan will be put into place within 60 days, Winkler said. If it finds for the hospital, the election could proceed immediately, he said.
Winkler said much of the original complaint against the hospital was dismissed and noted the union dropped its second charge.
“The employer has done a pretty good job of complying with the law,” Winkler said.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed





This will help keep medical costs under control. It will be so much nicer when janitors can strike and close a hospital. All hail "the Leader".
The unions and our morons in congress have managed to completely insert themselves into private enterprise via the National Labor Relations Act.
An employer is not allowed to inform it's employee's that it may have to close if a union is voted in, even though it could be the complete truth. That is an unfair labor violation. How fair is that? Shouldn't the employee's get information from both sides?
The labor laws have managed to cover everything any labor organization could possibly do for its members. All they do is create friction between an employee and their employer. They are dinosaurs and need to go.