Vegas-based Pinnacle moves ahead with Louisiana casino

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

1. By environprotector

   Oct. 20, 2009

   7:10 p.m.

   Flag

   This is good for Louisiana, they need all of the job generating businesses they can get for recovery in the region.

2. By kc212203

   Oct. 21, 2009

   5:18 a.m.

   Flag

   Something about this company still leaves a bad taste in my mouth after they demolished The Sands and left a vacant lot just off the Boardwalk in Atlantic City. A marketing campaign stating "those other casinos are just practice" and other arrogant statements.

3. By Longtimevegan

   Oct. 21, 2009

   6:38 a.m.

   Flag

   Pinnacle decision to move forward in opening a casino in Baton Rouge will be met with resistance from the voters. Opening a casino in Baton Rouge is not in the best decision for the community. We sit each day and watch our friends and neighbors go through bad times, and then we have some greedy knuckle head in the barracuda company Pinnacle, deciding to exacerbate problems by funneling monies from a local community economy to enrich shareholder and investor, and must likely line local polictians pockets. After all this Lousiana! Pinnacle has no interest in the future of the Baton Rouge community, nor have they provided or added value to the community. A casino in Baton Rouge is not in the best interest, long or short term, for the local citizens. No value, educational or monetarily. A interest only in the interest of Pinnacle to add value to shareholder and investors. In addition, Pinnacle has not established a personal relationship with the local voters, at least the locals would like to know who will take down their community structure and stop the young people from attending school with the lure of low wage jobs.

   The local polictians who are shorting the voter will be accountable. Pinnacle is a barracuda company, this shows it plan-clear and simple. By placing a casino in the Baton Rouge community, Pinnacle will influence the young people away from schools in hope of getting a job for short term relief. Young people should stay focus on much needed education. Another casino to enrich the owners and sharehold is bull!!! A company that has no interest in the local ecnomony is not the answer. This adds to a already bad preception of casinos of being greedy and unconcerned with a community's growth and well being. Sad, we have to goes through this during these tough times. A huge public relation blunder in making for Pinnacle. I can assure the shareholders and investors, this is a big mistake, one that will ripple to the elected officials who are in support of this Fountainbeau type project, except the locals will come out and do what is reasonable, stop this madness of companies like Pinnacle from further damaging communities that are trying to rebuild.

   This is a distraction by Pinnacle to lure a community from rebuilding with the lure of a quick buck. Taking advantage of a labor pool in need of jobs, providing an illusion of relief to enrich shareholder and investors that have no interest in the growth of the Baton Rouge community.

4. By American_Gaming_Guru (Timothy Sullivan)

   Oct. 21, 2009

   11:14 a.m.

   Flag

   Longtimevegan. It is my understanding that the local votors approved the Pinnacle plan, did they not?