Print
E-mail
Share
digg
Newsvine
Facebook
Stumble
Technorati
reddit
Fark
twitterSquabbles hold up help for Las Vegas’ homeless
Part of a grant was to go to improve coordination among agencies. But which would be in charge of the money?
LEILA NAVIDI / LAS VEGAS SUN FILE
Tents line the sidewalk in May at the homeless encampment on Foremaster Lane between Las Vegas Boulevard North and Main Street. Spending of $4.1 million in federal money to prevent homelessness has been delayed by debates among local social service agencies.
Monday, Nov. 30, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
Sun Coverage
Six months ago, officials trumpeted a $4.1 million plan built on federal stimulus money that would allow local nonprofit organizations to offer more of a much-needed service, help with rent and utility bills, and in a completely new way.
Now it appears the money won’t be on the streets until January at the earliest, a result of squabbles about how to hand it out and to whom. This despite the collateral damage that the Las Vegas Valley’s
13 percent unemployment rate continues to amass, including a 17 percent increase in utility cutoffs in the past year, an average of 8,300 every month.
The original idea behind the plan was for nonprofit organizations to use most of the money to help people step back from the edge of homelessness and the rest of it for improving computer systems that link together the more than 15 agencies throughout the valley providing help with rent and utility bills.
The initial proposal said: “Historically, Southern Nevada’s homeless prevention system has been fragmented, with upward of 15 agencies receiving ... funding ... each with its own set of rules. This fragmentation is inefficient and ineffective.”
Improving the computer system that those agencies use to cut down on fragmentation was going to take $314,000 of the $4.1 million, an idea that remains in place.
It was to be the debut of the “no wrong door” approach, meaning a lot less runaround for the increasing number of people who needed help, officials noted in May.
But the money for those improvements wound up getting its own runaround. Byzantine debates in and around the Clark County Commission set in, including controversy surrounding the process used for choosing nonprofit agencies to marshal most of the money, not to mention how many people to hire to oversee the program and whether help would reach certain ZIP code areas but not others.
In a Sept. 15 meeting, a representative of Consumer Credit Counseling Services read a statement from that organization’s president, Michele Johnson, indicating that she intended to file an appeal after not being chosen as one of the two lead agencies marshaling the money.
The statement also alleged that other, unnamed agencies might wind up running afoul of the federal government because of mismanagement.
Local activist Anthony Snowden spoke to the commission about “concerns with the process” he had, which included certain agencies — again, unnamed — “coming to the table as if they’re entitled.”
Within minutes, Commissioner Larry Brown was impatiently appealing to his peers, “we’ve asked people to put in six, seven months of work. We should move forward.”
Commissioner Chairman Rory Reid added, “Once you have a process, you have winners and losers. The process is usually questioned by those who weren’t selected.”
But paralysis set in, calendar pages kept turning and the county, the leader on the joint plan made with Henderson and North Las Vegas, eventually ditched the original recommendations on whom to work with, and under what terms, finally issuing a second call to nonprofit organizations for proposals on handling the money.
County Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani called the whole scenario “bureaucracy at its worst, to some extent.” She said she thought the money had squeezed through the pipeline already and called the ongoing holdup “bothersome.”
The allegations that the process for choosing the organizations was tainted really were more “about turf. It’s about someone likes this group versus that group.”
So she suggested and then got votes in favor of handing the money over to Clark County Social Service, which will act as fiscal manager of the grant and work with nonprofit organizations that will spend the money and manage casework.
Commissioners are to vote Tuesday on the new plan to have Clark County Social Service contract with three agencies that in turn will work with five agencies each to spend the money.
Terrie D’Antonio is president of HELP of Southern Nevada, one of the three agencies selected. She said it was unfortunate that so much time had passed while need continues to grow. She noted that her agency currently gives out help to people who are behind on their rent, but a $300,000 federal grant she has for that purpose will be tapped out before Christmas.
D’Antonio suggested that something could be learned from the scenario to date. “More people need to be involved upfront in the process,” she said. “We have to make sure everybody is clear before the request for proposals is put out.”
The goal: “more transparency,” D’Antonio said. “These are federal dollars, after all.”
Nancy McLane, director of Clark County Social Service, said she didn’t think “hastening the decision would have been better” because time has been needed to make sure the money is handled responsibly. She was confident that the plan’s original intentions — not only giving help, but improving how the help is given — will still be met.
Discussion: 12 comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.
Post a comment
Spotlight
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Ritz-Carlton Lake Las Vegas to close in May
- Pricey land buy on Strip a bit of a surprise
- Engineering marvel taking shape near Hoover Dam
- Harry Reid’s co-writer unloads while discussing polls, Obama quote
- Grim numbers show Nevada leads nation in suicides over 60
- Police: Legal runner returned to home, shot husband and wife
- UNLV back in the polls: No. 23 in AP, No. 25 in ESPN/USA Today
- MGM Mirage to leave N.J. in dispute over Macau partner
- GOP should blame itself for deficit, not Democrats
- The 10 best steakhouses in Las Vegas
Blogs
Shark Bytes
Willis reminds me of another great UNLV guard
Elsewhere
With aggressive push, Internet gambling again in play
The Kats Report
A very quick list of which females could replace Steven Tyler in Aerosmith (8 Comments)
A 3.5-day sprint, highlighted superflously at Flamingo with Las Vegas newcomers
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Horsford: No taxes now, but tax reform later (14 Comments)
Gibbons: Cutting the budget can help me raise money (10 Comments)
Gibbons: Lawmakers made State of State worse with taxes (5 Comments)
Calendar »
- 9 Tue
- 10 Wed
- 11 Thu
- 12 Fri
- 13 Sat
-
Far East Movement at Blush
Blush Boutique Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Benji Madden at Moon
Moon Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Hugh Fink at the Riviera Comedy Club
The Riviera Comedy Club
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Give it to Clark County, they know what they need to do. It's a lot of money and it's got to be put in the right place or it'll just evaporate.
Good to know someone is trying to do the right thing.
Sean Insannity, heard on local Las Vegas hate-talk radio, says that "even the poorest people in our society have TVs, bathrooms, washers and dryers, and telephone."
Gee, I didn't know these tents were so well-equiped.
The sad reality is, it will get worse.
Take your time, folks. It's not as if people are starving in the streets or freezing to death.
Just ask the King of Las Vegas, Oscar Goodman;
He's an expert on the homeless.
Giving the money to the POVERTY PIMPS GUARANTEES the money will be SQUANDERED!
Looks like none of the POVERTY PIMPS learned anything from all the ANGER MANAGEMENT crap they dish out to the homeless or from their forced 12-Step Religious Cult's Serenity Prayer!
Not ONE PERSON will get a home with that money; NOT ONE!
"The statement also alleged that other, unnamed agencies might wind up running afoul of the federal government because of mismanagement."
How could the federal government fault an agency for mismagement? Look at the plank in your own eye first, Federales!
It's funny watching the POVERTY PIMPS Foam-at-the-Mouths over money, like an animal carcass thrown in a pool of Piranhas; nothing will be left for the homeless....NOTHING!!
If the homeless funding went to the homeless the homeless problem would have been solved 40 years ago.
All the politicians want to get there cut first !! By the time the money gets to the people who really need it will be cut down like a piece of crack !