LOOKING IN ON: HIGHER EDUCATION:

Smatresk vows more openness

Steve Marcus

UNLV President Neal Smatresk answers a question at Tuesday’s Faculty Senate meeting.

Saturday, Nov. 21, 2009 | 2 a.m.

More Sun education coverage

UNLV President Neal Smatresk’s meeting with the Faculty Senate — and his pledge of better communication about budgetary decisions — appears to have helped smooth some ruffled feathers.

The university leadership’s decision to spend close to $500,000 on new positions and raises for nonteaching administrators in the student affairs unit raised concerns among some faculty members, who are facing pay cuts and heavier workloads as a result of a steep reduction in state funding.

At a meeting of the Faculty Senate this week, Smatresk agreed there had not been enough information provided to explain and provide context for the decisions. In the future, Smatresk said, his office will produce a quarterly report on raises and compensation to be shared with the Nevada System of Higher Education, the Faculty Senate’s financial affairs committee and the joint administrative-faculty committee that reviews all requests for exceptions to the hiring freeze. He will also involve the financial affairs committee members in discussions about future budget cuts.

The money spent on personnel in student affairs included both new positions and about $90,000 in raises that accompanied expanded job responsibilities. The changes were necessary to improve the admissions and financial aid process and to ensure a complicated overhaul of UNLV’s software systems had appropriate support, Smatresk said.

Professor Greg Brown, president of the university’s Faculty Alliance, wrote on the group’s blog that Smatresk’s offers “represented a clear step forward for shared governance at UNLV.”

•••

How is the 15.4 percent cut in state funding playing out at UNLV?

Professors are facing pay cuts of 4.6 percent along with increased work responsibilities. The university’s support staff employees will take 12 furlough days over each of the two years of the biennium. Resources in certain departments have not kept pace with enrollment increases.

Bryan Spangelo, a professor of chemistry at UNLV and member of the Faculty Senate, said his department is keenly aware of the effects. He was one of the more vocal critics of the university leadership’s decision to spend close to $500,000 on new positions and raises for nonteaching administrators in the student affairs unit.

Chemistry Professor Stephen Carper died two years ago, and the university’s hiring freeze prevents the department from replacing him, Spangelo said. As a result of more students and fewer professors, the department had to ease its course requirements for undergraduates studying biochemistry, dropping a once-mandatory research component.

“Look around the academic landscape at this campus,” Spangelo said. “You’ll see it’s a barren landscape.”

•••

Nevada high school students are using more tobacco products, reversing several years of declining use.

Oral screenings by the UNLV School of Dental Medicine on students from eight Nevada counties, including Clark and Washoe, show 23 percent of students used tobacco-based products, up from 16 percent the prior year. Until this year tobacco use among Nevada teens had been steadily declining, down from 22 percent in 2005.

Nationally, about 20 percent of high school students smoke cigarettes, according to the most recent survey by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Since 2001 nearly 70,000 students statewide have received oral health screenings as part of the “Crackdown on Cancer” program. Parents must give consent for their children to participate.

Dentists and dental hygienists were at Centennial High School this week, checking students for signs of tissue abnormalities that might require further care.

Last year 283 tissue abnormalities were found in students statewide.

The findings of the dental school’s “Crackdown on Cancer” screenings typically mirror the percentage of tobacco use that students self-report as part of the state’s biennial Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

By reallyoldvegas

Nov. 21, 2009

7:31 a.m.

Suggest removal

The fact is that UNLV's "leadership" for the past six years of budget troubles (i.e. 3 different presidents), have all refused to make the tough choices. It has been budget cut by convenience on the academic side of the house -- who ever quits or retires determines the cuts.

UNLV needs to start cutting programs with few students, cut the administrative waste, and get create about how it does its job.

Start making decisions based on good management, not ease of the choice.
By dodgerchuck

Nov. 21, 2009

9:11 a.m.

Suggest removal

gee,thats nice from him,i wonder if it will last
By lv_spiff

Nov. 21, 2009

10:24 a.m.

Suggest removal

reallyoldvegas - I think you are right but unfortunately the faculty senate and greg brown don't see it that way. Smatresk took the job knowing he was going to have to make the cuts but he seems to be running into road blocks from the faculty groups that seem to think that the univ has plenty to pay them and keep MORE programs going.
I applaud Smatresk for his efforts thus far. He is doing his best to revamp the university, cut some costs and bolstering the areas that need improvement, and bring in the money they so desperately need. This new endeavor to make that more clear is commendable.
By nevadaappleslices

Nov. 21, 2009

12:26 p.m.

Suggest removal

World class faculty have to take furloughs and increased loads when some guy without a PhD and only a few years work experience gets a $21,000 raise! In my opinion, giving only FOUR people raises and no one else was a huge mistake in terms of making everyone feel valued.

I completely agree that you need to pay good salaries to good people, but in my opinion, paying $110k for a recent Comp Sci grad is double market value and that is too much.

My opinion is that Smatresk made a mistake by not doing research on market values of these positions and claiming that these 4 people are strategically more important than anyone else.