Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2009 | 3:18 p.m.
Reader poll
Sun Archives
- Pet sterilization. Not mandatory, yet (10-21-09)
The Las Vegas City Council, heeding the call of a wide coalition of spay-and-neuter proponents, on Wednesday passed the toughest such ordinance in the region in an attempt to reduce rampant pet overpopulation.
After a hearing that lasted almost three hours, the council voted 5-2 to pass the measure.
Council members Lois Tarkanian and Ricki Barlow voted against it, echoing opponents' main concern: that the ordinance requires all dogs and cats older than four months be spayed or neutered, except under certain circumstances.
Tarkanian -- who said she polled 10 veterinarians -- as well as a few citizens who spoke on the issue, each said they believed that while spaying and neutering pets is usually humane at six months, four months is often too young. One opponent termed it “mutilation.”
Councilman Barlow wondered if a compromise age could be reached.
But proponents were in no mood for conciliation. Councilman Steve Ross, who sponsored the ordinance, said the time for such revisions was past -- as was the option of doing nothing in the hope that the problem simply goes away.
“Sitting on our hands is not an option,” Ross said.
Those in favor of the measure clearly outnumbered opponents in the boisterous crowd, which cheered when the ordinance passed. Proponents ranged from area animal control officials, veterinarians and animal behaviorists to community activists and even a ninth-grade girl who is a foster owner of eight puppies.
The city’s detention and enforcement chief, Karen Coyne, said in fiscal 2009 the city impounded 19,682 animals -- more than 12,000 of which, or 62 percent, were euthanized. Those numbers have steadily risen both for cats and dogs over the last three years, she said.
Regionwide last year, 55,000 stray animals found their way to shelters. More than 30,000 were put to death.
Coyne said there was no realistic alternative to the spay-and-neuter ordinance, which was modeled after the measure North Las Vegas passed about one year ago. Clark County has yet to pass such a measure, but officials there say it will be revisited.
The ordinance will exempt those with permits as dog or cat fanciers, breeders or professional animal handlers.
City officials also noted that regular pet owners who don't want their pet spayed or neutered could obtain a non-professional breeder permit at a small annual fee. Certain restrictions would apply in those cases, including a visit from an city animal control staffer to make sure the household is suitable for pet ownership and breeding.
In addition to the spay-and-neuter provisions, the ordinance also requires that cats and dogs have tiny microchips implanted before being adopted or recovered from an impound. No one at the council meeting took issue with that provision.
Shelters are mostly exempted from the ordinance. But the Lied Animal Shelter, which serves Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and Clark County, already has a policy in place mandating that pets adopted from the shelter are microchipped, vaccinated and spayed or neutered.
The ordinance is in part aimed at so-called backyard breeders, who have been illegally breeding pets to turn a quick buck -- and severely adding to the overpopulation problems.
One veterinarian scoffed at the notion that the ordinance was unnecessary because the only thing that needed to be done was find more people to adopt unwanted pets.
“We cannot adopt our way out of this problem,” said Amy Mitchell, a veterinarian at Lied. “To think we can adopt our way out is living in Never Never Land.”
Mitchell termed the pet overpopulation issue as a “reproductive nightmare.”
Opponents of the measure expressed a few concerns other than their main problem about the young age of those that now need to be sterilized.
In some cities that have adopted these types of measures, owners who don’t want to abide the laws have become reluctant to take their animals to the vet, because their scared to be reported to the authorities, they said.
That’s led to an increase in rabies and other preventable illnesses, the opponents claimed.
Just before the vote took place, Ross added a provision to mandate that the council review the ordinance annually to make sure it’s working as expected.
Where in the Constitution does it say the government can force pets to get fixed.
I'll bet ACORN is behind this.
Another feline evangelist of socialized medicine!
As much as I hate these types of enforcements, I have to agree with this one. I hate agreeing though! It's like punishing everyone for the few irresponsible folks. BUT...I would rather see a new law than seeing more critters euthanized. I adopted my kitty from Homeward Bound Cat Adoptions, so she was already fixed. Its a tough call!
Hey marianevans: how 'bout Article IV, Section 4:
"The United States...shall protect each (State in this Union) against Invasion..."
As in "invasion" of unwanted dogs and cats in the Vegas valley that end up costing millions of dollars each year to care for and/or euthanize. 12,000 euthanized last year!!! That's just plain horrible!
I love dogs (and cats), and if people in the Vegas valley in general aren't decent enough to be responsible pet owners on their own, then I have no problem with the government forcing them to do the right thing. I adopted a puppy from Lied ten years ago, who was spayed, and she has led a very happy, wonderful life.
Maybe you, marianevans, are one of those backyard breeders who doesn't care about anything other than making your quick buck with the sale of your puppies? Just wondering why you would object to this ordinance otherwise...
While I have had my dog and 3 cats all spayed or neutered, I still don't think the government should be involved in this. We need less, not more government, ie. health care. It could be worse though, I read somewhere in CA that declawing cats is prohibited.
...And while we are on this subject... I also beleive that we should spayed and neuter All of these baby factories that are carelessly putting kids into the world that can not ( or will not ) take proper care for them.. Your reckless irresponsibility should not have to be felt by young kids that were brought into this world because you won't keep your legs closed. If everybody took responsibility for there own actions,We would not have the social problems that we have RIGHT NOW with Children and Pets !
Now, with a solution, they can look into the mexican problem?
I have no problem with the ordinance except why must some one who does not want to fix their pet have to pay a fee?
"The ordinance is in part aimed at so-called backyard breeders, who have been illegally breeding pets to turn a quick buck -- and severely adding to the overpopulation problems.
In addition to the spay-and-neuter provisions, the ordinance also requires that cats and dogs have tiny microchips implanted before being adopted or recovered from an impound. No one at the council meeting took issue with that provision.
The city's detention and enforcement chief, Karen Coyne, said in fiscal 2009 the city impounded 19,682 animals -- more than 12,000 of which, or 62 percent, were euthanized. Those numbers have steadily risen both for cats and dogs over the last three years, she said."
One step closer to procreation permits, microchipping and euthanization -- of humans.
: {
Interesting how it doesn't mention that they also want to seize the puppies and kittens from your unspayed pets and put them in the too-full shelter and collect a hefty adoption fee for them because puppies and kittens adopt out very quickly.
That's it! THANK YOU, Acadia! You exposed the insidious plot by Councilman Steve Ross to profit from adopting out puppies and kittens! You're my hero, Acadia. I wish I were as smart as you.
"One step closer to procreation permits, microchipping and euthanization -- of humans."
Suuuure, Harley. Whatever you say. Rather than telling the rest of us what bright ideas occur to you, learn some English. "Euthanization" is not a word.
To those of you condeming this law, I suggest you go down to Lied animal shelter someday and watch as 100's of loving, sweet, adorable animals are put to sleep for lack of good homes. Last year over 10,000 cats went into Lied and 8,450 didn't make it out. So keep whining and griping about how it's no one else's business. It sure should be someone's business that animals are being KILLED left and right.
I think all of you that are commenting against this initiative must not be responsible pet owners because responsible pet owners who love their pets and care about animals do not want healthy pets killed in droves because people cannot seem to get the idea that we have a SERIOUS overpopulation problem we do not need to keep breeding more, let cats and dogs have litters because it is 'cute', let unfixed dogs wander or breed animals with the idea of making money only not to be able to sell the dogs and having them end up in shelters where they will most likely be put to sleep. The comments are all focused on government taking over but at this point the government needs to take over and make real consequences for irresponsible people on behalf of the animals that DO NOT have a choice in the matter or a voice and are suffering and dying because of it. Bottom line if you are a responsible pet owner you would certainly know how many animals are killed unnecessarily and part of owning a pet is ensuring that you can provide proper medical care including spaying and neutering which has many more benefits for the pet medically than just controlling overpopulation. If you don't want to spay and neuter or be responsible and register and have some oversight on your contribution to the pet population than you have no business owning a pet in the first place and these attitudes above are exactly the reason animals are dying everyday unnecessarily and the blood is on our hands as a society for which we should be ashamed. Maybe some of you should read this "one cat and her offspring can produce up to 420,000 kittens in a mere six years" "one unfixed dog and its first litter of puppies can produce up to 67,000 unwanted dogs in a six-year period". My comment would be if you are not up for saving lives of innocent animals by being responsible with your own than you need not worry about any oversight by the government if you just simply do not own a pet.