Petition seeks amendment requiring secret vote in union elections
Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009 | 6:27 p.m.
CARSON CITY – An initiative petition has been filed to amend the Nevada Constitution to require employees to vote secretly when deciding whether to be represented by a union.
The petition, filed with the Secretary of State’s Office by a group called Save Our Secret Ballot, would require 97,002 signatures to qualify for the 2010 ballot.
Tibi Ellis, chairwoman of the group, said some union elections are now held in secret. But there are efforts to change that. She said in some cases union officials gather signatures to show employers that the workers want representation.
She said a public opinion poll shows 60 percent of union members support the drive.
She said the secret ballot initiative is already on the ballot in Arizona and Utah and the organization is trying to qualify it in Nevada, South Dakota, South Carolina, Colorado and Missouri.
Ellis, of Las Vegas, said unions challenged the language on the proposed ballot in Missouri and Colorado and it withstood those legal suits.
Danny Thompson, a representative of the unions, could not be reached for comment.
Congress is looking at allowing some elections to be held in without a secret ballot, Ellis said.
The petition says, “The right of individuals to vote by secret ballot is fundamental. Where local, state or federal law requires election for public office or ballot measures, or requires designations or authorization for employee representation, the right of individuals to vote by secret ballot shall be guaranteed.”
The petition was filed by Las Vegas lawyer Raymond E. McKay Esq., who said the initiative would be amended within days to include the names of the backers.
An explanation of the initiative says the secret ballot “was adopted to protect against voter intimidation and retaliation, particularly prevalent against minority voters.”
It said Congress is considering legislation to eliminate secret ballots for some elections. “Therefore Nevada voters need the opportunity to protect their secret ballot rights in the Nevada Constitution.”
If passed in the 2010 election, it would need approval in the 2012 election to be included in the Nevada Constitution.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Sounds like a good idea to me. Much as I despise WalMart, this is no time to be giving the Union organizers another chance to screw up more and more companies. How's that UAW 'doon?
Ummm, the UAW was NOT the cause of GM's failing. It was the idiot executives who mismanaged the company to hell in a handbasket. And no one wants to "take away the secret ballot". Maybe I'd support this measure if it were to protect workers from the type of employer harassment that companies like WalMart use against workers all the time.
A secret ballot sounds like a good idea for the employees, though details need to be worked out on who can propose a ballot, how often, and protections (from both employers & unions) for those who either propose a ballot or are elected to represent employees.
I will vote for it: All ballots should be secret!