ANSWERS: CLARK COUNTY:

Mobile billboards roll onto commissioners’ agenda

Sunday, Nov. 15, 2009 | 2 a.m.

Stripper-Mobile

You need to upgrade your Flash Player

There’s a very real chance that more than a few viewers might tune into Clark County Television, cable Channel 4, this week.

Why? Will it be airing a continuous loop of stripper-mobile footage?

No, but the stripper-mobile was almost part of this Tuesday’s Clark County Commission meeting until its operator decided to shut it down Friday. Commissioners may instead discuss the precursor to the stripper-mobile, the mobile billboard. Commissioners Chris Giunchigliani said she will use the board meeting to discuss geographic restrictions on mobile billboards, which she said are driving into residential neighborhoods.

And even without the wild women on wheels, the meeting agenda has several other potentially good topics. One concerns potentially millions of dollars in what some think are uncollected room taxes; another may be portrayed as a test of the commissioners’ patriotism; and there’s the return of the long-delayed highway project that could affect the livelihoods of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Las Vegas Valley workers.

Oh no, not the highway saga that never ends.

This may finally be the big finish. After many months of legal haggling, commissioners appear ready to decide who is going to win the more than $100 million Las Vegas Beltway expansion job — Fisher Sand & Gravel or Las Vegas Paving.

The fed-up commissioners have been threatening to just chuck the $100 million-plus job and spread the money around to other highway-improvement jobs.

That apparently prompted Fisher and LV Paving to negotiate, and sources say Fisher might be willing to drop its complaint if it can work with LV Paving on the Beltway project.

That likely means that taxpayers will wind up with the LV Paving price for the work, which is $4 million more than what Fisher bid, but the exact outcome remains to be seen.

So what is the patriotism test?

McCarran International Airport is one of the largest airports in the country that doesn’t provide a military lounge to enlistees or officers. But it certainly studied the matter. Commissioner Steve Sisolak said a committee formed two years ago to examine the issue. “And it just seemed to die.” He says unused lounge space once occupied by an airline is available and could be cheaply fitted to provide military personnel a place to relax. He has also talked to veterans who say nothing extravagant is required, just a few couches to sink into. The item is listed for discussion only.

And the big ticket item?

Faced with one estimate that Nevada could recoup $500 million-plus in allegedly unpaid room taxes, commissioners will discuss whether they want to hire attorneys to sue online tourism agencies. Communities across the country are suing with some success. The allegations are that online agencies such as Expedia, Orbitz and locally based operations such as VEGAS.com, which is owned by the Greenspun family, which also owns the Sun, negotiate with hotels to buy rooms at one rate, then sell them to tourists at a higher rate — but pay room taxes, now at 12 percent in Nevada, on the lower rate.

•••

If I fry my turkey next week, is there something I can do with the leftover gallons of oil? I mean, besides pouring it into the toilet, alongside my curb or over the fence into the neighbor’s yard.

Cooking oil is a big concern in Clark County this time of year, because the oil can coagulate and block drains and sewers. So instead of dumping the stuff, turkey fryers have the chance through Clark County’s Water Reclamation District to recycle the oil into biofuel with its “Don’t be a Pain in the Drain” campaign. For drop-off locations and dates, go to www.paininthedrain.com.

Tom Collins

•••

County Quote of the Week:

“I went from five or six Dr Peppers a day to none, and I went from three steaks a day to maybe one.”

— Commissioner Tom Collins’ explanation of how he lost 35 pounds since the end of July.

Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

By serious

Nov. 15, 2009

5:33 a.m.

Suggest removal

The Commission should ban this type of advertising and promotion...it does not show us as a serious meetings and trade show destination. Jobs are at stake, so legal or not legal, it is in poor taste...the poorest. At the same time the Commission ought to SOMEDAY do something about the taxicab situation in the Valley and how the drivers will only go where there is a 'kickback/tip'...where is the County and the Convention Authority in all of this. Please do the right thing!
By wwunlv

Nov. 15, 2009

8:38 a.m.

Suggest removal

This type of advertising might be more of a First Amendment issue than the stripper box was. That was presented as a public safety issue. Unless they can turn the argument away from the first amendment, the commission will have a hard time

As for the driver kickbacks/tips issue. I don't think that this commission has the guts to address that issue. Too much political pressure in that issue.

The Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority is a no show. As usual, they just sit back and collect their salaries and don't get very involved in any of these issues.
By dodgerchuck

Nov. 15, 2009

9:17 a.m.

Suggest removal

get them guys off of the road,we have enough traffic and congestion without those "slow boats to china" clogging up the major city streets
By 2zero

Nov. 15, 2009

5:01 p.m.

Suggest removal

Asked how he could explain the two inches he had grown and Collins attributed that to the Viagra.
By stevem

Nov. 15, 2009

6:36 p.m.

Suggest removal

hey...all you mobile billboard companies...

you wanna fight this?

here's what you do:

make SURE to get the campaign contribution reports for EVERY judge and politician in clark county...

You'll notice a certain law firm that has a "metallic" name represents a certain company that sells advertising that the COUNTY profits from.

just a wee little bit of conflict of interest.

the very people that will make the decision to outlaw these things stand to make A LOT of money from the lack of competition to the county's mobile advertising.