Las Vegas Sun

August 22, 2014

Currently: 86° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Letter to the Editor:

Harm from waterboarding well-documented

The moralizing about waterboarding displayed in William F. Brennan’s Sunday letter to the editor is an example of one of the more distressing arguments regarding the debate on torture being forwarded by conservatives. Brennan argues that waterboarding, harsh as it may be, does not involve “extreme physical pain” and/or “intense suffering.” Therefore, waterboarding cannot be defined as torture.

This would be a reasonable argument if waterboarding did indeed not involve extreme pain or suffering for the person being waterboarded, and if after waterboarding, the victim remained whole and unharmed, but that isn’t entirely true.

In an April 30 commentary in the Los Angeles Times, detainee Abu Zubaydah’s co-counsel, Joseph Margulies, writes about how Zubaydah’s preexisting mental and memory problems were exacerbated by waterboarding. Zubaydah now suffers from seizures, headaches and permanent brain damage.

In Sept. 25, 2007, testimony before the Senate, Dr. Allen Keller, director of the Bellevue/New York University Program for Survivors of Torture, described the short-term and long-term effects of waterboarding: drowning, heart attack, and later depression, panic attacks and post-traumatic stress disorder, all of which could easily qualify as “intense suffering.”

The debate over waterboarding is ultimately one of semantics, though. I am tired of the childish self-justification I see in defenses of “enhanced interrogation,” the finger-pointing and the whining arguments of “At least we’re not as bad as the bad guys — the real torturers — are.”

We should not let the injustices of others color our own actions and morals. Instead, we should look in the mirror and ask ourselves whether we can use waterboarding as well as other techniques including genital mutilation (see the case of Binyam Mohamed) and still maintain our moral standing as a free and just country.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.