Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleEducation:
Successful run under ‘No Child’ likely at end
After two years of progress under federal law, district expects to come up short
Friday, July 10, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- Test scores don't quantify progress at all schools (6-25-2009)
- District masters other testing aspect: Appeals (7-30-2008)
- state wants say in deploying help to struggling schools (7-27-2008)
- School official gives Clark County an 'A' grade for NCLB results (7-24-2008)
- Fewer county schools make feds' grade (7-22-2008)
Sun Coverage
Two years ago, when the Clark County School District surpassed for the first time the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act, Superintendent Walt Rulffes was jubilant. I better not catch you calling us a failing district, he said jokingly to the assembled members of the news media as he announced results showing the district had achieved “adequate yearly progress.”
Last year, when the district once again met those standards, Rulffes crowed that Clark County was the only district among the nation’s 10 largest to earn a passing grade.
This year, there’s likely to be less celebrating.
The district isn’t expected to make adequate yearly progress, sources tell the Sun. Although remarkable gains were made at individual campuses, those performances won’t likely be enough to carry the day for the entire school system.
Such highs and lows are part of the love-hate relationship district officials have had with the No Child Left Behind Act since its passage in 2002. They have never seemed certain whether they should embrace it, ignore it or fight to replace it.
“We’ve gone back and forth on this many, many times,” said Joyce Haldeman, associate superintendent of community and government relations for the district. “Do we spend our time educating the public on how unrealistic the goals are, or do we spend our time educating children? We’ve chosen the latter.”
A sliver of hope remains that the district could still make adequate yearly progress, or AYP, this year, as officials are going through an appeals process with the Nevada Education Department, checking for errors and building a case for exceptions.
The official announcement of the results is scheduled for July 23.
Under federal education law, all public school students must demonstrate proficiency in reading, writing and mathematics by the 2013-14 academic year. Schools must meet benchmarks for overall performance and participation, as well as for subgroups of students, based on ethnicity, special education status, English proficiency and family income.
If the district does not meet the requirements, it will be placed on the state’s “watch list.”
A second consecutive year of low scores would mean a district is identified as in need of improvement. With each successive year on the “needs improvement” list, sanctions increase — from having to offer students transfers to more successful campuses to the replacement of key staff to a takeover by the state and finally the federal government.
Educators have long decried No Child Left Behind’s expectations as unrealistic. To be sure, it doesn’t take much for a school to fall short. Failing to have 95 percent of eligible students present for testing will do it. Low performance by just one or two students in a particular subgroup can also lead to a failing grade.
Mary Jo Parise-Malloy, co-founder of Nevadans For Quality Education, said that during the past seven years the public has grown to understand the idiosyncrasies involved in reaching adequate yearly progress.
“Some of the measurements they use are just ridiculous and I think most of us know that,” she said. “Parents have opinions on schools regardless of AYP. People look at how their individual children are doing, and make their own determinations.”
Haldeman said she realizes the district can’t have it both ways — decry the ranking system as unfair in years when it falls short, and sing its own praises when it meets the goals. That, however, doesn’t mean officials should pass up an opportunity to acknowledge hard work and achievement, either, she said.
“When anyone makes progress you want to give them credit for it,” she said. “This has become a huge morale issue for staff. Everyone works so hard, but because they don’t meet an artificial deadline, the whole school feels like they failed.
“The most difficult thing for an educator to see is a school making real progress and still having a negative label slapped on.”
The federal law is up for reauthorization and several significant changes are being considered, including giving schools more credit for progress. But the feds have told states and local districts that modifications are unlikely for at least another year and, for now, the current standards will remain.
The challenge for Nevada’s public schools will become more formidable next year, when the proficiency benchmarks are raised by between 4 and 14 percentage points at each grade level, the first increase since 2007.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
Everything Under the Sun
Blogs
The Kats Report
Clint Holmes is a big deal at Cabaret Jazz and 'The Carlyle!'; Playboy's furry-ous closing; Elvis is a 'Legend'
Joe Pesci remembers his own honeymoon in Vegas -- meeting the Rat Pack (1 Comment)
Las Vegas Philharmonic says search for new music director to begin 'immediately' (1 Comment)
With Shenandoah project stalled, Wayne Newton hits back legally (7 Comments)
Where does a Playmate play when she turns 21? Vegas! (3 Comments)
Ice Ice Billy
The road to six-toed cats and Mayor Bubba
The Kats Report
David Itkin tells L.V. Philharmonic officials he's on his way out (14 Comments)
- Locally owned and independent since 1950; Winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, best news website in the nation & DuPont Award for broadcast journalism
Get rid of the NCLBA. See how fast the smart ones excel.
Schools are compared to each other. While one district calls the deadlines artificial and the goals to hard to meet, another district is doing just that. It's like their students declaring a test is too hard because they failed while half the students receive an A. There has to be a measurement of success, it's just too bad the teachers cannot claim the dog ate their homework.
"Haldeman said she realizes the district can't have it both ways -- decry the ranking system as unfair in years when it falls short, and sing its own praises when it meets the goals."
Why would we want our kids to achieve?
No standards is fine if everyone is going to deal cards and make beds.
Nevada does not want to be compared to other states.
A group of states are banding together to establish an agreed national standard not just one that Nevada makes up. No mention of that here.
We complain because kids have to go to school and take the test. But too many are not showing up. Well that is a problem.
We passed a 1.2 billion dollar tax increase but the kids will not show any improvement.
Hard work for those teachers and staff.
NCLB is the most ridiculous, draconian piece of crap legislature that has ever hit our school system.
Here's a better idea- PUT SOME MORE MONEY INTO THE EDUCATION SYSTEM!!! Make education a profession worth being engaged in. I'm not saying that good teachers dont exist in the valley, but their positions are constantly being marginalized by bills with standards such as NCLB and by the fact that bartenders make more then them.
No illusions in Nevada education
The Silver State, to its credit, has tests that actually test
http://npri.org/publications/no-illusion...
"No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was intended to hold public schools accountable for student success by withholding federal funding unless schools were subjected to tests that measured student success. Schools were then required to have 100 percent reading proficiency by 2014 -- a laudable but unrealistic goal. Each year schools were required to make Adequately Yearly Progress (AYP) toward that goal. Schools that consistently failed to make AYP were subject to sanctions.
The intent of NCLB was to not only provide an incentive for schools to improve student success, but to help parents and teachers understand how well, or poorly, students were performing. The major flaw with NCLB was that states were allowed to make their own tests and thus define "proficiency" as they saw fit.
Some states defined proficiency very liberally. Others simply dummied down their tests year after year -- the better to give the illusion that their students were learning more and more."
clark county education = failure....