Boulder City residents receptive to wind farm proposal
Richard Brian
Bob Charlebois, managing director of development of Duke Energy, addresses the crowd Tuesday during a public input meeting at the Boulder City Library.
Friday, Jan. 30, 2009 | midnight
To comment
Send written comments to Mark Chandler, BLM Project Manager, BLM Las Vegas Field Office, 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89130, or fax them to (702) 515-5015, or e-mail them to Searchlight_Wind_Energy_EIS@blm.gov.
Related story
Related link
A public meeting on a wind energy project proposed for an area 30 miles south of Boulder City drew about 30 attendees to the Boulder City Library Thursday night. Many of those in attendance were eager to delve into specifics of the 161-turbine proposal that could power roughly 100,000 homes.
The $500 million Duke Energy proposal for a wind farm near Searchlight must first undergo an environmental impact statement -- studying everything from bird and bat migration routes to effects on the local economy -- before the Bureau of Land Management approves or rejects the plan. That decision, based on whether it serves the public interest, will likely be made by April 2011.
The Bureau is taking public comment through Feb. 17. What the public thinks could ultimately affect the project's scope. Duke has already altered the initial plan: It moved turbines further from Searchlight after the original proposal, which featured the 415-foot-high turbines roughly encircling the town, drew criticism, said Bob Charlebois, Duke's managing director of development.
"Frankly, I couldn't get to my car fast enough," he said, referring to a meeting in Searchlight. "Our goal is to design a project as acceptable to as many people as possible."
Now, four towers measuring wind speed, temperature and other indicators are situated across the 24,383-acre area.
"They will determine if there's enough wind to make it profitable here," said E.J. Koford, of URS, the contractor conducting the environmental impact study.
The studies will additionally scrutinize the cultural resources, visual resources and geology of the area as well as the project's potential benefits.
The first draft of the EIS is slated for publishing in summer 2010.
During the planning process, extensive surveys of both bird and bat populations will be completed, Koford said. They will incorporate microsonic detectors to track bats and biologists will watch birds and their patterns throughout the night. Koford said turbine placement would attempt to avoid any migratory hot spots. He added that wind turbine design has improved much in recent years as lattices, which can provide perches, have been removed and the turbine's rotation has slowed to once per second.
"The rotation has massively reduced the impact to birds," Koford said.
Boulder City resident Happy Hoekenga asked about the turbines' effects on birds and said she was satisfied with the answers. She said she hoped the wind project's success would lead to the closure of fossil fuel plants.
"I'm a strong believer in alternative energy," she said. "I love nature and want to see it here for our grandkids."
Officials also fielded questions on the project's workforce, estimated to be in the hundreds during the project's six months of construction. Fifteen to 20 permanent employees would be needed after completion, and the site would be manned 24 hours a day. Charlebois said he has already had extensive discussions with local labor unions.
"It is our intention to get as much local content into the project as possible," he said, highlighting the need for road contractors and concrete vendors. "It will result in tens of millions of dollars in direct investment in the region."
Some in attendance questioned the scope of the disturbed space, which will encompass 600 acres -- 120 of which will be altered permanently. Officials said roads will be needed to construct the turbines and connect them to the nearby Western Area Power Administration grid. The lines between turbines will be underground, Charlebois said.
In response to concerns aired about public use of the land, Charlebois said they would try to maintain relatively unfettered access to the public. He noted a Texas wind farm welcomes hikers to the site.
He also said Duke intends to enter into a long-term, fixed-price contract with a supplier, meaning customers would not be subjected to the price spikes that come with fossil fuel use.
Cindy Smith said she left with a positive impression of the project after driving from Las Vegas just to see the presentation. She said she had heard of wind farms elsewhere and was anxious to see one in Nevada.
"I think this is a great thing," she said. "Isn't this what the new president is all about?"
Smith also lauded the location.
"There's always wind down there," she said.
Dave Clark can be reached at 990-2677 or dave.clark@hbcpub.com.
Discussion: 3 comments so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- The pull of a drug, a push to the brink
- System fails to catch contractor’s family tie with county
- Where to watch UFC 106
- Findlay guard Joseph scores 33, talks about UNLV
- UNLV and Southern Illinois will be guarded tonight
- Bishop Gorman takes Sunset Region title in win over Cimarron
- Basic’s magical season continues with trip to state semifinals
- Was there an ulterior motive in parking the stripper-mobile?
- Reid clears major health care hurdle, daunting weeks ahead
Blogs
Culture and Entertainment
UFC 106 walk-in music: Griffin changes his tune, secures win over Ortiz
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (7 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (2 Comments)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (4 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 22 Sun
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
-
The Four Tops at The Orleans Showroom
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
The Chase at Downtown Cocktail Room
Downtown Cocktail Room | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Lady Gaga album release party at Revolution Lounge
Beatles Revolution Lounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Food drive at Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier The Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Above & Beyond at Moon
Moon Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati













We went to the meeting in Searchlight two nights before. Over 100 citizens of the town showed up. In the three hours of comments, NOBODY stood up and supported the project. It is a small town and many of the residents have retired there because they like the quiet town and spectacular scenery. One woman even said that she moved there to get away from the ugly wind farm mess in Palm Springs. All of the people were flat out against this project. Everybody who spoke was against the project.
When one of the town residents asked the two speakers how the wind turbines would effect property values, both speakers actually said wind turbines RAISE property values! This was met with loud, sarcastic laughter from the audience.
Bob Charlebois said they were doing an avian and bat study to determine how much impact turbines would have on these populations. He implied that if impacts were too great, the project would not happen. I asked him if there was an official number of bird deaths that would considered too high to proceed with this project. He looked very confused and after a couple seconds the BLM contractor cut in and simply said, "no".
Other questions were about money and jobs staying in the town. The answers were no.
The project is just a give away to a big company. The taxes will be taken by the county and the Federal Government. The people of the town will lose their view, property values, wildlife, access to public lands and quiet place to retire. No jobs will be created for locals except cheap construction jobs, but it was pointed out that construction for the Boulder City Sempra Solar Facility was contracted out to people from another counrty-Nicaragua. All in all, this is a lose/lose project for the citizens and the wildlife.
The Boulder City meeting only had 30 people show up and this article does not give a very realistic story about how the public really feels about this boondoggle. You can write a better article, Las Vegas Sun.
http://www.basinandrangewatch.org/Wind-S...
I went to this meeting too, because I own a parcel of land near Searchlight. I did not hear one person there support this corporate-government scheme to ruin a small town and ship the energy (and profits) off to somewhere else. Why don't we all get government grants to put photovoltaic panels on every house in the city, which would be much more efficient and not destroy our public lands. It's always about helping the big companies (which will get tax breaks and maybe even government grants from Obama, if my reading of the stimulus bill is correct). Searchlight did not want this mess.
This project belongs in Primm or Jean.