Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Friday, Jan. 23, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Beyond the Sun
For military veterans, the small things matter. Like being able to take advantage of disabled parking privileges and still have a Purple Heart license plate.
They’re hoping state lawmakers will grant at least that much of their wish list when the Legislature begins its legislative session in February.
But some of the veterans’ more ambitious goals will be tough sells.
They’d like to see a new nursing home in Sparks to serve the northern part of the state and new language defining which disabled veterans qualify for property tax exemptions. But those cost money.
So, like many other agencies, the Nevada Veterans Services Office is mostly hoping to protect benefits, programs and services it has.
“We can’t lose a single inch,” Tim Tetz, the agency’s director said, noting the various tax exemptions afforded to veterans could be vulnerable given the state’s desperate need for cash.
The state is struggling as it is to keep up with the needs of veterans. The percentage of veterans per capita in Nevada is 3 percent higher than the national average, yet the state is 48th in the nation for per capita federal compensation and pension benefits.
Tetz attributes that shortcoming to not having enough veteran service outreach officers.
“And until we do we’ll fall further and further behind,” he said.
The outreach efforts are key to getting veterans the benefits they are entitled to for their service. The state has one service officer for every 18,000 vets in the state, almost twice the national ratio of 1 to 10,000.
Tetz is testifying before the Legislature’s budget committees today to lay out the agency’s needs and budget.
The Nevada State Veterans Home in Boulder City is absorbing all the cuts in the agency’s state funding for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The governor has recommended that the home receive 51 percent and 73 percent less money in 2010 and 2011, respectively. However, the agency expects an increase in federal funding for the home that will make up for the gutting by the state.
Federal funding also helps the agency achieve other necessities, such as an emergency expansion the 4-acre the Northern Nevada Veterans Memorial Cemetery, which has used all of its single burial vaults.
Much of what veterans have identified as important are modest goals. They’re trying to find a sponsor for a bill that would allow handicapped veterans who use Purple Heart license plates to have the disabled-veteran designation added to the plate so they can use benefits afforded handicapped motorists. They’d like to create a gold-star license plate for family members of those killed in action. And they want all the veteran license plates to be applicable for motorcycles.
Veterans also would like to see increased hunting and fishing privileges for active duty and National Guard members, so “when they come home from deployments they can actually enjoy Nevada,” Tetz said.
Two goals proved contentious when introduced in the 2007 Legislature. Efforts to better define “veteran” — which affects who gets access to various state benefits — collapsed when two vets went door-to-door in the Legislative Building, telling lawmakers it was a bad idea. And an attempt two years ago to prohibit protests at military funerals got as far as a compromise struck by veterans and the American Civil Liberties Union, but the session concluded before the bill could be approved.
Veterans are riled about having turn over $1.9 million in reimbursement from Medicaid to the state’s general fund. Many veterans believe the money was given for the care of vets and should stay with the agency, and want new budget rules to allow the agency to keep any extra money received from Washington once the state’s general fund is reimbursed.
One of the challenges veterans face in Carson City is speaking with one voice — witness how the two vets upended the effort to redefine “veterans.” At the legislative summit the group held in November, Tetz and others urged unity.
Tetz also delicately instructed veterans who work as advocates in Carson City to stay on topic, keep it brief and to try not to “beat up the people who know are going to vote for us.”
I'd sure like to know the names of the two vets that torpedoed our efforts?
It's time for vets to unite and rally around the Nevada Office of Veterans Services - and we need to take these "rogue" vets aside and have a little "counseling" session about how most of us are working to try and help, not hinder, to meet the needs of ALL of Nevada's veterans!
Often, I'm stunned at how uneducated so many of the so-called "veterans advocates" and "leaders" are in their lack of knowledge about basic civics and how blatantly obvious it is that they are NOT politically astute!
As an example, we had vets standing up and whining, sniveling and complaining about the federal funding and slow progress on the coming VA Medical Center at a recent State meeting - and there is nothing, absolutely nothing, that the NOVS can do about that federal program!
In follow-up conversations with these complainers - they didn't even know the difference between the Nevada State Assembly and State Senate or who are representatives are in the U. S. House of Representatives and U. S. Senate! Guys and gals, if you don't even know the names of the people, and the seats they hold, in representing you - you really need to do some basic remedial homework!
It's time to leave the leading to real leaders - like former NCO's and Commissioned Officer Vets! Feel free to contact me at jlabbinett@cox.net if you have any questions - there are lots of people willing to help you brush up!
So, to all you vets out there that have not done their homework and really don't know what you're talking about - PLESAE think about the damage you may be doing to the rest of us because you're just uneducated or just lazy? If nothing else just show up, sit, listen and LEARN!
Tim Tetz knows exactly how the political process works, and fails to work, and we should all get behind the NOVS!
Every veteran should let their "leaders" know that they want UNITY and are tired of the old, divisive, partisan, petty politics of yesterday!
Change has come guys and gals - and this new generation of vets has greater needs than any before it - and we owe it to them to help pass the torch of activism so they can win the war at home, not against, but with the V.A.!
That means it's time for all the old timers, regardless of political party affiliation, to muster, fall-in and report for duty in the spirit of good order and discipline - that means being polite and professional guys and gals!
Tim Tetz, and his staff, and a slew of very well informed veterans advocates and activists are trying to hold the line - that's an appropriate strategy. But, IF the vet groups leaders would stop the petty personal politics and get serious about fighting the good fight we could, and should, be advancing our issues to double the number of Veteran's Service Officers and help every Nevada veteran get the benefits they deserve - and that would bring in millions more to the Nevada economy!
Clinger admitted at the hearing that these were not actually cuts, this shortfall was merely compounding on the old shortfall and that this budget didn't take into account any of the "cuts" made last year.
"KDR81" Who is "Clinger" what is their title and role in all this?